Polygamy in Perspective of Islamic Law Hermeneutics

Danial Danial
{"title":"Polygamy in Perspective of Islamic Law Hermeneutics","authors":"Danial Danial","doi":"10.29240/jhi.v8i1.5139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the legal verses of polygamy from a hermeneutical perspective. The third verse of surah al-Nisa is often understood as a verse commanding polygamy, because it contains recommendations to marry more than one woman, namely: two, three and four. The data used in this article are divided into two categories. The collected data were then analysed using the hermeneutic theory of Emelio Betti, Martin Heidegger, Hans Georg Gadamer and Paul Ricoeur with a descriptive method. The results of the research based on the hermeneutic theories above show that the third verse of surah al-Nisa which is usually used as the argument for polygamy from the Koran actually reinforces the recommendation of monogamy because according to Betti the purpose of marriage is sakinah mawaddah wa rahmah, this goal is difficult to realize in polygamy. Then according to Heidegger the verse above talks about justice for orphans. Furthermore Gadamer that polygamy is carried out with 2 conditions; (1) the 2nd, 3rd and 4th wives are widows who have orphans; (2) there must be a feeling of worry that they cannot do good and justice to orphans except by marrying their mothers. Finally, Ricoeur is of the view that the verse above is an order to act fairly in protecting the assets of orphans. The conclusion is that the third verse of surah al-Nisa is a recommendation for monogamy, not an order for polygamy.","PeriodicalId":33101,"journal":{"name":"AlIstinbath Jurnal Hukum Islam","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlIstinbath Jurnal Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.5139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the legal verses of polygamy from a hermeneutical perspective. The third verse of surah al-Nisa is often understood as a verse commanding polygamy, because it contains recommendations to marry more than one woman, namely: two, three and four. The data used in this article are divided into two categories. The collected data were then analysed using the hermeneutic theory of Emelio Betti, Martin Heidegger, Hans Georg Gadamer and Paul Ricoeur with a descriptive method. The results of the research based on the hermeneutic theories above show that the third verse of surah al-Nisa which is usually used as the argument for polygamy from the Koran actually reinforces the recommendation of monogamy because according to Betti the purpose of marriage is sakinah mawaddah wa rahmah, this goal is difficult to realize in polygamy. Then according to Heidegger the verse above talks about justice for orphans. Furthermore Gadamer that polygamy is carried out with 2 conditions; (1) the 2nd, 3rd and 4th wives are widows who have orphans; (2) there must be a feeling of worry that they cannot do good and justice to orphans except by marrying their mothers. Finally, Ricoeur is of the view that the verse above is an order to act fairly in protecting the assets of orphans. The conclusion is that the third verse of surah al-Nisa is a recommendation for monogamy, not an order for polygamy.
伊斯兰教法解释学视野中的一夫多妻制
本文从解释学的角度考察了一夫多妻制的法律条文。古兰经al-Nisa的第三节通常被理解为命令一夫多妻制的经文,因为它包含了娶多个女人的建议,即:两个,三个和四个。本文使用的数据分为两类。然后使用埃梅里奥·贝蒂、马丁·海德格尔、汉斯·格奥尔格·伽达默尔和保罗·里科尔的解释学理论,用描述性的方法对收集到的数据进行分析。基于上述解释学理论的研究结果表明,通常被用作古兰经中一夫多妻制论点的苏拉第三节实际上强化了一夫一妻制的推荐,因为根据贝蒂的说法,婚姻的目的是sakinah mawaddah wa rahmah,这一目标在一夫多妻制中很难实现。根据海德格尔的说法,上面的诗句是关于孤儿的正义的。此外,伽达默尔认为一夫多妻制有两个条件;(一)二、三、小老婆是有孤儿的寡妇;人们一定有一种担忧的感觉,即他们除非和孤儿的母亲结婚,否则就无法为孤儿做些好事和公正的事。最后,Ricoeur认为上面的诗句是为了公平地保护孤儿的财产。结论是,苏拉的第三节是一夫一妻制的建议,而不是一夫多妻制的命令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信