Controversial Issues of the Current Procedure for Appealing a Court Decision in Absentia

Natalya V. Alekseeva, Larisa N. Pavlova
{"title":"Controversial Issues of the Current Procedure for Appealing a Court Decision in Absentia","authors":"Natalya V. Alekseeva, Larisa N. Pavlova","doi":"10.37399/issn2072-909x.2023.9.29-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the problems of legal regulation of appealing against an absentee decision in a civil procedure, namely the legal consequences of the receipt of the defendant’s appeal to the court, when the defendant missed the deadline for filing an application to cancel the absentee decision and the restoration of this time limit was denied. The authors conclude that if the defendant did not file an application for the annulment of the decision in absentia or he was denied the restoration of the deadline for filing such an application, the court of first instance should proceed from the fact that the appeal was filed against a court decision that is not subject to appeal in the appeal proceedings. The issue of applying the clarification given in the Review of Judicial Practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 2 (2015) is considered, the article substantiates that at present these clarifications are not subject to application.","PeriodicalId":487513,"journal":{"name":"Российское правосудие","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Российское правосудие","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2023.9.29-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the problems of legal regulation of appealing against an absentee decision in a civil procedure, namely the legal consequences of the receipt of the defendant’s appeal to the court, when the defendant missed the deadline for filing an application to cancel the absentee decision and the restoration of this time limit was denied. The authors conclude that if the defendant did not file an application for the annulment of the decision in absentia or he was denied the restoration of the deadline for filing such an application, the court of first instance should proceed from the fact that the appeal was filed against a court decision that is not subject to appeal in the appeal proceedings. The issue of applying the clarification given in the Review of Judicial Practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 2 (2015) is considered, the article substantiates that at present these clarifications are not subject to application.
缺席上诉程序中存在的争议问题
本文论述了民事诉讼中对缺席决定提起上诉的法律规制问题,即被告逾期未向法院提出撤销缺席决定的申请,且该期限的恢复被驳回时,被告向法院提起上诉的法律后果。提交人的结论是,如果被告没有在缺席的情况下提出撤销判决的申请,或者他被拒绝恢复提出这种申请的最后期限,一审法院应从上诉是针对一项在上诉程序中不得上诉的法院判决提出的这一事实出发。本文考虑了适用《俄罗斯联邦最高法院司法实践审查》第2号(2015年)中给出的澄清的问题,文章证实,目前这些澄清不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信