Criminal liability for non-traditional sexual relations in Norway and the Russian Federation

IF 0.1 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Ahmed Ali, Tat'yana Fedorovna Minyazeva
{"title":"Criminal liability for non-traditional sexual relations in Norway and the Russian Federation","authors":"Ahmed Ali, Tat'yana Fedorovna Minyazeva","doi":"10.33463/2687-122x.2023.18(1-4).1.097-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines issues related to the perception of non-traditional sexual relations by society, the state and legislation in Norway and the Russian Federation. Attention is drawn to the trends in the historical development of the legislative regulation of responsibility for acts related to non-traditional sexual relations in the context of ideas about morality at a particular stage of socio-economic development of the state. A comparison of approaches to the conclusion of same-sex marriages in different countries is carried out. Moral and aesthetic views on the problem of the content of the principle of respect for the rights and freedoms of persons with non-traditional sexual relations in Norway and Russia are analyzed. The inexpediency of explicit demonstration of nonviolent non-traditional sexual relations in society is substantiated. The article analyzes the legal regulation of Norwegian legislation in comparison with other countries regarding the recognition of same-sex marriages with the right to adopt children. The authors emphasize that there is no need to legalize such marriages in Russia, including those concluded abroad. According to the authors, in the criminal legislation of Russia, it is pointless to establish a special motive of hatred for persons with non-traditional orientation. At the same time, attention is drawn to the approach to persons with this orientation in the Russian Federation as ordinary citizens of the state.","PeriodicalId":40112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33463/2687-122x.2023.18(1-4).1.097-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines issues related to the perception of non-traditional sexual relations by society, the state and legislation in Norway and the Russian Federation. Attention is drawn to the trends in the historical development of the legislative regulation of responsibility for acts related to non-traditional sexual relations in the context of ideas about morality at a particular stage of socio-economic development of the state. A comparison of approaches to the conclusion of same-sex marriages in different countries is carried out. Moral and aesthetic views on the problem of the content of the principle of respect for the rights and freedoms of persons with non-traditional sexual relations in Norway and Russia are analyzed. The inexpediency of explicit demonstration of nonviolent non-traditional sexual relations in society is substantiated. The article analyzes the legal regulation of Norwegian legislation in comparison with other countries regarding the recognition of same-sex marriages with the right to adopt children. The authors emphasize that there is no need to legalize such marriages in Russia, including those concluded abroad. According to the authors, in the criminal legislation of Russia, it is pointless to establish a special motive of hatred for persons with non-traditional orientation. At the same time, attention is drawn to the approach to persons with this orientation in the Russian Federation as ordinary citizens of the state.
挪威和俄罗斯联邦对非传统性关系的刑事责任
这篇文章审查了挪威和俄罗斯联邦的社会、国家和立法对非传统性关系的看法。在国家社会经济发展的特定阶段,在道德观念的背景下,对与非传统性关系有关的行为的责任的立法监管的历史发展趋势引起了人们的注意。对不同国家的同性婚姻缔结方式进行了比较。对挪威和俄罗斯关于尊重具有非传统性关系的人的权利和自由原则的内容问题的道德和美学观点进行了分析。在社会中明确展示非暴力非传统性关系的不适宜性得到了证实。本文分析了挪威在承认具有收养子女权利的同性婚姻方面的法律规定,并与其他国家进行了比较。作者强调,在俄罗斯没有必要使这类婚姻合法化,包括在国外缔结的婚姻。发件人认为,在俄罗斯的刑事立法中,为具有非传统倾向的人确立仇恨的特殊动机是毫无意义的。与此同时,应注意在俄罗斯联邦将具有这种倾向的人作为国家普通公民对待的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信