Cut elimination by unthreading

IF 0.4 4区 数学 Q4 LOGIC
Gabriele Pulcini
{"title":"Cut elimination by unthreading","authors":"Gabriele Pulcini","doi":"10.1007/s00153-023-00892-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We provide a non-Gentzen, though fully syntactical, cut-elimination algorithm for classical propositional logic. The designed procedure is implemented on $$\\textsf{GS4}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>GS</mml:mi> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , the one-sided version of Kleene’s sequent system $$\\textsf{G4}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . The algorithm here proposed proves to be more ‘dexterous’ than other, more traditional, Gentzen-style techniques as the size of proofs decreases at each step of reduction. As a corollary result, we show that analyticity always guarantees minimality of the size of $$\\textsf{GS4}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>GS</mml:mi> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> -proofs.","PeriodicalId":8350,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-023-00892-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We provide a non-Gentzen, though fully syntactical, cut-elimination algorithm for classical propositional logic. The designed procedure is implemented on $$\textsf{GS4}$$ GS 4 , the one-sided version of Kleene’s sequent system $$\textsf{G4}$$ G 4 . The algorithm here proposed proves to be more ‘dexterous’ than other, more traditional, Gentzen-style techniques as the size of proofs decreases at each step of reduction. As a corollary result, we show that analyticity always guarantees minimality of the size of $$\textsf{GS4}$$ GS 4 -proofs.

Abstract Image

脱线消除切口
摘要针对经典命题逻辑,提出了一种非gentzen但完全句法化的切消算法。所设计的程序在Kleene的顺序系统$$\textsf{G4}$$ g4的单侧版本$$\textsf{GS4}$$ gs4上实现。这里提出的算法被证明比其他更传统的根岑风格的技术更“灵巧”,因为在每一步的缩减中,证明的大小都在减少。作为推论结果,我们证明了分析性总是保证$$\textsf{GS4}$$ GS 4证明的最小大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信