{"title":"Scoping Review: Brachial Plexus Birth Injury (BPBI) and Gross Motor Function","authors":"Inayah Manji, Sarah Gardiner, Doria Bellows","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2022-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) is a neonatal injury occurring in 1.24 in 1000 live births. The result of this injury on arm function is highly variable and has been the subject of many studies. However, the effect of BPBI on the development of overall gross motor function is less well studied. We aimed to synthesize the available literature on posture, balance and coordination, and gait in children with BPBI. Method: A scoping review was conducted by searching five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, and Web of Science) and the grey literature for all study types related to our question. Studies unrelated to birth injuries, animal studies, and literature reviews were excluded. Three researchers independently screened the studies during two rounds of review (title/abstract and full-text). Results: Of the 2728 articles found, 16 articles were included. Overall, the average study quality was 0.90 out of 1.00. These studies suggest that observed postural deficits in BPBI are secondary to asymmetry rather than true scoliosis. Further, the asymmetrical nature of the injury results in both balance deficits and gait abnormalities when compared to healthy age-matched populations. Conclusions: The scoping review demonstrates that while there are obvious consequences to overall motor function and development in BPBI, these effects are likely under-studied. Further research should focus on understanding overall developmental differences in children with BPBI. Expanding on this information could possibly allow for earlier intervention, extended scope of physiotherapy, and better functional outcomes.","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2022-0127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) is a neonatal injury occurring in 1.24 in 1000 live births. The result of this injury on arm function is highly variable and has been the subject of many studies. However, the effect of BPBI on the development of overall gross motor function is less well studied. We aimed to synthesize the available literature on posture, balance and coordination, and gait in children with BPBI. Method: A scoping review was conducted by searching five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, and Web of Science) and the grey literature for all study types related to our question. Studies unrelated to birth injuries, animal studies, and literature reviews were excluded. Three researchers independently screened the studies during two rounds of review (title/abstract and full-text). Results: Of the 2728 articles found, 16 articles were included. Overall, the average study quality was 0.90 out of 1.00. These studies suggest that observed postural deficits in BPBI are secondary to asymmetry rather than true scoliosis. Further, the asymmetrical nature of the injury results in both balance deficits and gait abnormalities when compared to healthy age-matched populations. Conclusions: The scoping review demonstrates that while there are obvious consequences to overall motor function and development in BPBI, these effects are likely under-studied. Further research should focus on understanding overall developmental differences in children with BPBI. Expanding on this information could possibly allow for earlier intervention, extended scope of physiotherapy, and better functional outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy Canada is the official, scholarly, refereed journal of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association (CPA), giving direction to excellence in clinical science and reasoning, knowledge translation, therapeutic skills and patient-centred care.
Founded in 1923, Physiotherapy Canada meets the diverse needs of national and international readers and serves as a key repository of inquiries, evidence and advances in the practice of physiotherapy.
Physiotherapy Canada publishes the results of qualitative and quantitative research including systematic reviews, meta analyses, meta syntheses, public/health policy research, clinical practice guidelines, and case reports. Key messages, clinical commentaries, brief reports and book reviews support knowledge translation to clinical practice.
In addition to delivering authoritative, original scientific articles and reports of significant clinical studies, Physiotherapy Canada’s editorials and abstracts are presented in both English and French, expanding the journal’s reach nationally and internationally. Key messages form an integral part of each research article, providing a succinct summary for readers of all levels. This approach also allows readers to quickly get a feel for ‘what is already known’ and ‘what this study adds to’ the subject.
Clinician’s commentaries for key articles assist in bridging research and practice by discussing the article’s impact at the clinical level. The journal also features special themed series which bring readers up to date research supporting evidence-informed practice.
The Canadian Physiotherapy Association (CPA) is the national professional association representing almost 15,000 members distributed throughout all provinces and territories. CPA’s mission is to provide leadership and direction to the physiotherapy profession, foster excellence in practice, education and research, and promote high standards of health in Canada.