O072 Simple Vestibular-Occular Motor Assessment as a Predictor of Alertness State and Driving Impairment during Extended Wakefulness

P Nguyen, C Dunbar, A Guyett, K Nguyen, K Bickley, A Reynolds, M Hughes, H Scott, R Adams, L Lack, P Catcheside, J Cori, M Howard, C Anderson, N Lovato, A Vakulin
{"title":"O072 Simple Vestibular-Occular Motor Assessment as a Predictor of Alertness State and Driving Impairment during Extended Wakefulness","authors":"P Nguyen, C Dunbar, A Guyett, K Nguyen, K Bickley, A Reynolds, M Hughes, H Scott, R Adams, L Lack, P Catcheside, J Cori, M Howard, C Anderson, N Lovato, A Vakulin","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Driver fatigue contributes to 2-16% of road crashes, highlighting the need for improved detection of at-risk drivers. We used a novel and brief test of vestibular ocular motor system (VOMS) assessed via virtual reality goggles to predict alertness state and driving simulator performance during 29hr extended wakefulness. Methods 49 individuals (Mean±SD Age, 32.6±12.9, 45% Males) undergone 9hr baseline sleep opportunity followed by ~29hrs extended wakefulness with five 60min driving assessments. Cluster analysis, combining steering deviation and number of crashes were used to split participants into groups of either poor vs good driving performance. VOMS assessment was conducted using virtual reality goggles approximately 10mins before and after each drive. Predictive importance of VOMs metrics were ranked using XGBoost machine learning model, which was then utilized to distinguish between poor vs good driving groups. Model performance was evaluated using a 5-fold cross-validation approach using ROC analysis. Results XGBoost machine learning ranked all 70 VOMS metrics on their importance in predicting driving performance group for each drive. Top 10 metrics from pre-drive VOMS test predicted both daytime driving (tests 1-3, AUC 0.8 [95%CI 0.64-0.93], p<0.001) and night-time driving (tests 4-5, AUC 0.78 [95%CI 0.6-0.95, p<0.001]). Post-driving VOMS assessments also predicted daytime (AUC 0.74 [95%CI 0.53-0.9, p<0.001] and night-time driving (AUC 0.76 [95%CI 0.52-0.94, p<0.001]). Conclusion VOMS assessment show promise as a short and effective assessment of sleepiness to predict driving failure. Future validation in independent samples, sleep disordered population and in-field on-road testing are needed to confirm these promising findings.","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Driver fatigue contributes to 2-16% of road crashes, highlighting the need for improved detection of at-risk drivers. We used a novel and brief test of vestibular ocular motor system (VOMS) assessed via virtual reality goggles to predict alertness state and driving simulator performance during 29hr extended wakefulness. Methods 49 individuals (Mean±SD Age, 32.6±12.9, 45% Males) undergone 9hr baseline sleep opportunity followed by ~29hrs extended wakefulness with five 60min driving assessments. Cluster analysis, combining steering deviation and number of crashes were used to split participants into groups of either poor vs good driving performance. VOMS assessment was conducted using virtual reality goggles approximately 10mins before and after each drive. Predictive importance of VOMs metrics were ranked using XGBoost machine learning model, which was then utilized to distinguish between poor vs good driving groups. Model performance was evaluated using a 5-fold cross-validation approach using ROC analysis. Results XGBoost machine learning ranked all 70 VOMS metrics on their importance in predicting driving performance group for each drive. Top 10 metrics from pre-drive VOMS test predicted both daytime driving (tests 1-3, AUC 0.8 [95%CI 0.64-0.93], p<0.001) and night-time driving (tests 4-5, AUC 0.78 [95%CI 0.6-0.95, p<0.001]). Post-driving VOMS assessments also predicted daytime (AUC 0.74 [95%CI 0.53-0.9, p<0.001] and night-time driving (AUC 0.76 [95%CI 0.52-0.94, p<0.001]). Conclusion VOMS assessment show promise as a short and effective assessment of sleepiness to predict driving failure. Future validation in independent samples, sleep disordered population and in-field on-road testing are needed to confirm these promising findings.
简单前庭-眼运动评估作为长时间清醒状态下警觉状态和驾驶障碍的预测因子
驾驶员疲劳造成了2-16%的道路交通事故,强调了提高对危险驾驶员的检测的必要性。我们使用了一种新颖而简短的前庭眼运动系统(VOMS)测试,通过虚拟现实护目镜评估,来预测29小时延长清醒状态下的警觉性状态和驾驶模拟器的性能。方法49例受试者(平均±SD年龄,32.6±12.9,男性占45%)基线睡眠时间9小时,延长清醒时间~29小时,进行5次60min驾驶评估。聚类分析,结合转向偏差和撞车次数,将参与者分为驾驶性能差和驾驶性能好的两组。在每次驾驶前后约10分钟使用虚拟现实护目镜进行VOMS评估。使用XGBoost机器学习模型对VOMs指标的预测重要性进行排名,然后利用该模型区分差和好的驾驶组。采用5倍交叉验证方法对模型性能进行评估,并采用ROC分析。XGBoost机器学习将所有70个VOMS指标根据其在预测每个驱动器的驾驶性能组中的重要性进行排名。驾驶前VOMS测试的前10个指标预测了白天驾驶(测试1-3,AUC 0.8 [95%CI 0.64-0.93], p<0.001)和夜间驾驶(测试4-5,AUC 0.78 [95%CI 0.6-0.95, p<0.001])。驾驶后VOMS评估也预测了白天(AUC 0.74 [95%CI 0.53-0.9, p<0.001])和夜间驾驶(AUC 0.76 [95%CI 0.52-0.94, p<0.001])。结论VOMS评价是一种预测驾驶失误的快速有效的评价方法。未来需要在独立样本、睡眠障碍人群和现场道路测试中进行验证,以证实这些有希望的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信