What We Have Learned About Doctoral Student Mentoring At CTU: A Roundtable Discussion (And Hopefully a Provocation)

Karen O'Donnell, Dawn Howell, Christina Anastasia, Debra Burrington, Alexa Schmitt, Rae Denise Madison
{"title":"What We Have Learned About Doctoral Student Mentoring At CTU: A Roundtable Discussion (And Hopefully a Provocation)","authors":"Karen O'Donnell, Dawn Howell, Christina Anastasia, Debra Burrington, Alexa Schmitt, Rae Denise Madison","doi":"10.61643/c365272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last four years, CTU Doctoral Studies leadership and faculty have crafted and launched a new framework to mentor doctoral students to complete a high-quality practitioner dissertation. A 2020 poster session introduced a framework for doctoral research supervision that departed from the overall instructional framework employed in all CTU programs and embraced development of an innovative instructional framework for doctoral research supervision based on a mentoring-centric ethos and reflexive management strategies. This was followed by additional research and publications in 2020-2023. But has all this work made a difference? As the title of this provocation asks, “What have we learned about doctoral student mentoring as they proceed through the dissertation journey?” What do we need to change and what do we need to keep? What are the biggest bumps in the road our students face and how do we help them? These questions and others were explored in a roundtable discussion/provocation opportunity produced by a group of five CTU doctoral research faculty members.","PeriodicalId":489731,"journal":{"name":"The Pinnacle A Journal by Scholar-Practitioners","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pinnacle A Journal by Scholar-Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61643/c365272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last four years, CTU Doctoral Studies leadership and faculty have crafted and launched a new framework to mentor doctoral students to complete a high-quality practitioner dissertation. A 2020 poster session introduced a framework for doctoral research supervision that departed from the overall instructional framework employed in all CTU programs and embraced development of an innovative instructional framework for doctoral research supervision based on a mentoring-centric ethos and reflexive management strategies. This was followed by additional research and publications in 2020-2023. But has all this work made a difference? As the title of this provocation asks, “What have we learned about doctoral student mentoring as they proceed through the dissertation journey?” What do we need to change and what do we need to keep? What are the biggest bumps in the road our students face and how do we help them? These questions and others were explored in a roundtable discussion/provocation opportunity produced by a group of five CTU doctoral research faculty members.
我们对CTU博士生指导的了解:圆桌讨论(希望是一种挑衅)
在过去的四年中,CTU博士研究领导和教师已经制定并推出了一个新的框架,以指导博士生完成高质量的执业论文。2020年的海报会议介绍了一个博士研究监督框架,该框架脱离了CTU所有项目中使用的总体教学框架,并基于以导师为中心的精神和反思性管理策略,为博士研究监督提供了一个创新的教学框架。随后在2020-2023年进行了更多的研究和发表。但是,所有这些工作真的产生了影响吗?正如这篇文章的标题所问的那样,“我们从博士生的论文指导中学到了什么?”我们需要改变什么,需要保留什么?我们的学生面临的最大障碍是什么?我们如何帮助他们?这些问题和其他问题在圆桌讨论/挑衅机会中进行了探讨,这些讨论/挑衅机会由五名CTU博士研究教员组成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信