May States Curb Freedom of Religion, Speech, and The Press? A Constitutional Analysis

Constantinos Scaros
{"title":"May States Curb Freedom of Religion, Speech, and The Press? A Constitutional Analysis","authors":"Constantinos Scaros","doi":"10.61643/c337794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is an analysis about whether individual states are prohibited from establishing official religions within their jurisdiction, as the Supreme Court has long held. Specifically, it considers whether the Supreme Court is correct in applying the 14th Amendment to extend the First Amendment's religion establishment limitation of Congress to state governments. Finally, it examines the notion of \"judicial supremacy\" - that the Supreme Court is to be the universally recognized authority in resolving constitutional disputes - because that is a distinction the Supreme Court granted onto itself; the Constitution does not say so.","PeriodicalId":489731,"journal":{"name":"The Pinnacle A Journal by Scholar-Practitioners","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pinnacle A Journal by Scholar-Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61643/c337794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is an analysis about whether individual states are prohibited from establishing official religions within their jurisdiction, as the Supreme Court has long held. Specifically, it considers whether the Supreme Court is correct in applying the 14th Amendment to extend the First Amendment's religion establishment limitation of Congress to state governments. Finally, it examines the notion of "judicial supremacy" - that the Supreme Court is to be the universally recognized authority in resolving constitutional disputes - because that is a distinction the Supreme Court granted onto itself; the Constitution does not say so.
各州可以限制宗教、言论和新闻自由吗?宪法分析
这是一份关于各州是否被禁止在其管辖范围内建立官方宗教的分析,正如最高法院长期以来所做的那样。具体而言,它将考虑最高法院是否正确地运用第14修正案将第一修正案对国会宗教机构的限制扩大到州政府。最后,它审查了“司法至上”的概念- -即最高法院应成为解决宪法争端的普遍公认的权威- -因为这是最高法院赋予自己的一项区别;宪法没有这么说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信