P071 Simple Vestibular-Occular Motor Assessment as a Predictor of Driving Performance Vulnerability following extended Wakefulness

C Dunbar, P Nguyen, A Guyett, K Nguyen, K Bickley, A Reynolds, M Hughes, H Scott, R Adams, L Lack, P Catcheside, J Cori, M Howard, C Anderson, N Lovato, A Vakulin
{"title":"P071 Simple Vestibular-Occular Motor Assessment as a Predictor of Driving Performance Vulnerability following extended Wakefulness","authors":"C Dunbar, P Nguyen, A Guyett, K Nguyen, K Bickley, A Reynolds, M Hughes, H Scott, R Adams, L Lack, P Catcheside, J Cori, M Howard, C Anderson, N Lovato, A Vakulin","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Driver fatigue is a significant contributor to road crashes, but identifying individuals at driving risk is challenging. We examined the potential of simple baseline vestibular ocular motor system (VOMS) assessment via virtual reality goggles to predict subsequent vulnerability to driving simulator impairment following extended wakefulness. Methods 49 individuals (Mean±SD Age 32.6±12.9, 45% Males) underwent 9hr baseline sleep opportunity followed by approximately ~29hrs extended wakefulness with five 60min driving assessments. Cluster analysis classified drivers into vulnerable (n=17) or resistant (n=32) groups based on their worst steering deviation and number of crashes from driving tests. Baseline VOMS were performed ~10mins prior to the first three drives (1, 7 and 13hrs of wakefulness). XGBoost machine learning model was trained using baseline VOMs features to predict vulnerable vs resistant groups from driving tests 4 and 5 (19 and 25hrs of wakefulness) Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation approach using ROC analysis. Results XGBoost machine learning ranked all 70 VOMS metrics on their importance in predicting vulnerable vs resistant groups. Top 10 VOMs metrics assessed during baseline non-sleep deprived tests demonstrated a strong ability to predict the driver's performance following extended wakefulness, differentiating between the vulnerable vs resistant groups (AUC 0.73 [95%CI 0.61-0.83, p<0.001]). Conclusion VOMs tests conducted at baseline holds promise for predicting future driving impairment. This approach has the potential to be highly valuable in determining an individual's fitness to drive. Future validation in independent samples, sleep disordered population and in-field on-road testing are needed to confirm these promising findings.","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Driver fatigue is a significant contributor to road crashes, but identifying individuals at driving risk is challenging. We examined the potential of simple baseline vestibular ocular motor system (VOMS) assessment via virtual reality goggles to predict subsequent vulnerability to driving simulator impairment following extended wakefulness. Methods 49 individuals (Mean±SD Age 32.6±12.9, 45% Males) underwent 9hr baseline sleep opportunity followed by approximately ~29hrs extended wakefulness with five 60min driving assessments. Cluster analysis classified drivers into vulnerable (n=17) or resistant (n=32) groups based on their worst steering deviation and number of crashes from driving tests. Baseline VOMS were performed ~10mins prior to the first three drives (1, 7 and 13hrs of wakefulness). XGBoost machine learning model was trained using baseline VOMs features to predict vulnerable vs resistant groups from driving tests 4 and 5 (19 and 25hrs of wakefulness) Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation approach using ROC analysis. Results XGBoost machine learning ranked all 70 VOMS metrics on their importance in predicting vulnerable vs resistant groups. Top 10 VOMs metrics assessed during baseline non-sleep deprived tests demonstrated a strong ability to predict the driver's performance following extended wakefulness, differentiating between the vulnerable vs resistant groups (AUC 0.73 [95%CI 0.61-0.83, p<0.001]). Conclusion VOMs tests conducted at baseline holds promise for predicting future driving impairment. This approach has the potential to be highly valuable in determining an individual's fitness to drive. Future validation in independent samples, sleep disordered population and in-field on-road testing are needed to confirm these promising findings.
简单前庭-眼运动评估作为长时间清醒后驾驶性能脆弱性的预测因子
驾驶员疲劳是道路交通事故的重要因素,但识别处于驾驶风险中的个体是具有挑战性的。我们通过虚拟现实护目镜检测了简单基线前庭眼运动系统(VOMS)评估的潜力,以预测长时间清醒后驾驶模拟器损伤的后续脆弱性。方法49例受试者(平均±SD年龄32.6±12.9岁,男性45%)基线睡眠时间为9小时,延长清醒时间约29小时,并进行5次60min驾驶评估。聚类分析根据驾驶员的最大转向偏差和驾驶测试中的撞车次数,将驾驶员分为易受伤害(n=17)和抗受伤害(n=32)两组。基线VOMS在前三次驱动(清醒1、7和13小时)前约10分钟进行。使用基线VOMs特征对XGBoost机器学习模型进行训练,以预测驾驶测试4和5(清醒时间19和25小时)的易感组和抗性组。结果XGBoost机器学习对所有70个VOMS指标在预测弱势群体和抵抗群体中的重要性进行了排名。在基线非睡眠剥夺测试中评估的前10个VOMs指标显示出在长时间清醒后预测驾驶员表现的强大能力,区分了脆弱组和抵抗组(AUC 0.73 [95%CI 0.61-0.83, p<0.001])。结论在基线上进行的VOMs测试有望预测未来的驾驶障碍。这种方法在确定一个人的驾驶能力方面具有很高的价值。未来需要在独立样本、睡眠障碍人群和现场道路测试中进行验证,以证实这些有希望的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信