{"title":"P070 Efficacy of the ExVent Accessory with the O2Vent Optima Oral Appliance in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea – A Clinical Trial","authors":"S Sharma, H Reiter, A Conflitti","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction The study assessed the efficacy of oral appliance device O2Vent Optima and ExVent, an oral Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) accessory in the treatment of OSA. Methods A prospective, open-label study conducted at 3 sites in mild to moderate OSA (AHI ≥ 5 and ≤ 30). Screening Phase A diagnostic in-lab PSG study confirmed a diagnosis of mild to moderate OSA. Treatment I Subjects used O2Vent Optima for 6 weeks and underwent a PSG sleep night while using the O2Vent Optima. Treatment II Subjects used O2Vent Optima + ExVent for 6 weeks and underwent a PSG sleep night while using the O2Vent Optima + ExVent Primary Effectiveness Measure: Change in AHI between baseline vs. O2Vent Optima MAD vs. O2Vent Optima + ExVent Results Treatment with Optima, Optima + ExVent reduced AHI from 22.5±6.4/hr to 12.6±4.5/hr to 5.9±2.7 (p< 0.005 baseline vs. Optima and Optima + ExVent; p<0.05 Optima MAD vs. Optima + ExVent). Average reduction in AHI with Optima was 43% and with Optima + ExVent was 72%. The lowest oxygen during sleep increased from 84.6±2.7% to 88.6±2.9% to 91.6±3.2% (p< 0.005 baseline vs. Optima and Optima + ExVent; p<0.05 Optima vs. Optima + ExVent). During the trial patients on treatment with Optima and Optima + ExVent demonstrated no excessive adverse events or device malfunction. Conclusion Treatment with O2Vent Optima and O2Vent Optima + ExVent significantly improved OSA compared to the baseline. Even greater benefit was observed with addition of ExVent to the Optima in mild to moderate OSA.","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Introduction The study assessed the efficacy of oral appliance device O2Vent Optima and ExVent, an oral Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) accessory in the treatment of OSA. Methods A prospective, open-label study conducted at 3 sites in mild to moderate OSA (AHI ≥ 5 and ≤ 30). Screening Phase A diagnostic in-lab PSG study confirmed a diagnosis of mild to moderate OSA. Treatment I Subjects used O2Vent Optima for 6 weeks and underwent a PSG sleep night while using the O2Vent Optima. Treatment II Subjects used O2Vent Optima + ExVent for 6 weeks and underwent a PSG sleep night while using the O2Vent Optima + ExVent Primary Effectiveness Measure: Change in AHI between baseline vs. O2Vent Optima MAD vs. O2Vent Optima + ExVent Results Treatment with Optima, Optima + ExVent reduced AHI from 22.5±6.4/hr to 12.6±4.5/hr to 5.9±2.7 (p< 0.005 baseline vs. Optima and Optima + ExVent; p<0.05 Optima MAD vs. Optima + ExVent). Average reduction in AHI with Optima was 43% and with Optima + ExVent was 72%. The lowest oxygen during sleep increased from 84.6±2.7% to 88.6±2.9% to 91.6±3.2% (p< 0.005 baseline vs. Optima and Optima + ExVent; p<0.05 Optima vs. Optima + ExVent). During the trial patients on treatment with Optima and Optima + ExVent demonstrated no excessive adverse events or device malfunction. Conclusion Treatment with O2Vent Optima and O2Vent Optima + ExVent significantly improved OSA compared to the baseline. Even greater benefit was observed with addition of ExVent to the Optima in mild to moderate OSA.