{"title":"Psychosocial Risk Factors and Stress in an Oil Company in the Republic of the Congo: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Ebenguela Ebatetou-Ataboho, Marliti Ngambou Nguissaliki, Alhousseine Yansané, Patricia Atipo-Galloye, Jysses Geoffroy Kokolo","doi":"10.4236/odem.2023.114015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Occupational stress is a significant health concern in the work-place, constituting a prevalent psychosocial risk. Due to its specific nature, the oil industry is perceived as a high psychosocial risk zone. This study aimed to correlate the perceived stress level with the identified psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs) among employees of an oil company in Congo-Brazzaville. Materials and Methods: This was an analytical cross-sectional study conducted between July and September 2021 among employees of an oil company. They were recruited during their routine medical check-ups. Data were collected using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS10) and the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ), respectively to assess stress and identify PSRFs. Results: Out of the sample, 203 workers were included. The majorities were males (81.3%), and the average age of participants was 39.5 ± 9.62 years. The frequency of perceived stress was 39.4%, and 40% of the workers were exposed to at least 3 PSRFs. A positive correlation was observed between perceived stress and workload (r = 0.37, p < 0.001), emotional demands (r = 0.36, p < 0.001), and conflicts between work and family life (r = 0.42, p < 0.001). Conversely, good equity (r = -0.41, p < 0.001), trust in management (r = -0.25, p < 0.001), positive self-assessment of health (r = -0.33, p < 0.001), and strong organizational commitment (r = -0.50, p < 0.001) were identified as protective factors. The identified PSRFs explained 44% of the total variance. Conclusion: The study revealed that employees of this company exhibited a high level of stress. The detrimental impact of certain PSRFs was highlighted. A multidisciplinary intervention appears imperative to address these inherent risks in their professional environment.","PeriodicalId":388010,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Diseases and Environmental Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Diseases and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/odem.2023.114015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Occupational stress is a significant health concern in the work-place, constituting a prevalent psychosocial risk. Due to its specific nature, the oil industry is perceived as a high psychosocial risk zone. This study aimed to correlate the perceived stress level with the identified psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs) among employees of an oil company in Congo-Brazzaville. Materials and Methods: This was an analytical cross-sectional study conducted between July and September 2021 among employees of an oil company. They were recruited during their routine medical check-ups. Data were collected using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS10) and the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ), respectively to assess stress and identify PSRFs. Results: Out of the sample, 203 workers were included. The majorities were males (81.3%), and the average age of participants was 39.5 ± 9.62 years. The frequency of perceived stress was 39.4%, and 40% of the workers were exposed to at least 3 PSRFs. A positive correlation was observed between perceived stress and workload (r = 0.37, p < 0.001), emotional demands (r = 0.36, p < 0.001), and conflicts between work and family life (r = 0.42, p < 0.001). Conversely, good equity (r = -0.41, p < 0.001), trust in management (r = -0.25, p < 0.001), positive self-assessment of health (r = -0.33, p < 0.001), and strong organizational commitment (r = -0.50, p < 0.001) were identified as protective factors. The identified PSRFs explained 44% of the total variance. Conclusion: The study revealed that employees of this company exhibited a high level of stress. The detrimental impact of certain PSRFs was highlighted. A multidisciplinary intervention appears imperative to address these inherent risks in their professional environment.