What Are You Anxious About? Examining Subjects of Anxiety during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Lucia L. Chen, Steven R. Wilson, Sophie Lohmann, Daniela V. Negraia
{"title":"What Are You Anxious About? Examining Subjects of Anxiety during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Lucia L. Chen, Steven R. Wilson, Sophie Lohmann, Daniela V. Negraia","doi":"10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 poses disproportionate mental health consequences to the public during different phases of the pandemic. We use a computational approach to capture the specific aspects that trigger the public's anxiety about the pandemic and investigate how these aspects change over time. First, we identified nine subjects of anxiety (SOAs) in a sample of Reddit posts (N=86) from r/COVID19\\_support using the thematic analysis approach. Then, we quantified Reddit users' anxiety by training algorithms on a manually annotated sample (N=793) to annotate the SOAs in a larger chronological sample (N=6,535). The nine SOAs align with items in various recently developed pandemic anxiety measurement scales. We observed that Reddit users' concerns about health risks remained high in the first eight months since the pandemic started. These concerns diminished dramatically despite the surge of cases occurring later. In general, users' language disclosing the SOAs became less intense as the pandemic progressed. However, worries about mental health and the future steadily increased throughout the period covered in this study. People also tended to use more intense language to describe mental health concerns than health risk or death concerns. Our results suggest that the public's mental health condition does not necessarily improve despite COVID-19 as a health threat gradually weakening due to appropriate countermeasures. Our system lays the groundwork for population health and epidemiology scholars to examine aspects that provoke pandemic anxiety in a timely fashion.","PeriodicalId":338112,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 poses disproportionate mental health consequences to the public during different phases of the pandemic. We use a computational approach to capture the specific aspects that trigger the public's anxiety about the pandemic and investigate how these aspects change over time. First, we identified nine subjects of anxiety (SOAs) in a sample of Reddit posts (N=86) from r/COVID19\_support using the thematic analysis approach. Then, we quantified Reddit users' anxiety by training algorithms on a manually annotated sample (N=793) to annotate the SOAs in a larger chronological sample (N=6,535). The nine SOAs align with items in various recently developed pandemic anxiety measurement scales. We observed that Reddit users' concerns about health risks remained high in the first eight months since the pandemic started. These concerns diminished dramatically despite the surge of cases occurring later. In general, users' language disclosing the SOAs became less intense as the pandemic progressed. However, worries about mental health and the future steadily increased throughout the period covered in this study. People also tended to use more intense language to describe mental health concerns than health risk or death concerns. Our results suggest that the public's mental health condition does not necessarily improve despite COVID-19 as a health threat gradually weakening due to appropriate countermeasures. Our system lays the groundwork for population health and epidemiology scholars to examine aspects that provoke pandemic anxiety in a timely fashion.
你在焦虑什么?COVID-19大流行期间焦虑受试者的研究
COVID-19在大流行的不同阶段对公众造成了不成比例的心理健康后果。我们使用计算方法捕捉引发公众对大流行焦虑的具体方面,并调查这些方面如何随时间变化。首先,我们使用主题分析方法从r/COVID19\_support的Reddit帖子样本(N=86)中确定了9个焦虑主题(soa)。然后,我们通过在手动注释的样本(N=793)上训练算法来量化Reddit用户的焦虑,以便在更大的按时间顺序排列的样本(N=6,535)中注释soa。9个soa与最近开发的各种大流行焦虑测量量表中的项目一致。我们观察到,自大流行开始以来的前八个月,Reddit用户对健康风险的担忧仍然很高。尽管后来发生的病例激增,但这些担忧大大减少。一般来说,随着疫情的发展,用户披露soa的语言变得不那么激烈了。然而,在研究期间,对心理健康和未来的担忧稳步增加。人们还倾向于使用更激烈的语言来描述心理健康问题,而不是健康风险或死亡问题。我们的研究结果表明,尽管COVID-19作为健康威胁逐渐减弱,但由于适当的对策,公众的心理健康状况并不一定会改善。我们的系统为人口健康和流行病学学者及时研究引发大流行焦虑的方面奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信