MEASUREMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GOVERNANCE CAPABILITY LEVEL USING COBIT 2019 FRAMEWORK

Lexand Ripai Silaban, Melissa Indah Fianty
{"title":"MEASUREMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GOVERNANCE CAPABILITY LEVEL USING COBIT 2019 FRAMEWORK","authors":"Lexand Ripai Silaban, Melissa Indah Fianty","doi":"10.56327/ijiscs.v7i2.1543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The company, which is engaged in information technology services and solutions, is facing several issues. The first problem is the absence of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for documenting IT risks. Additionally, there have been instances of system downtime on the local servers, affecting both company and client data. Furthermore, data loss has occurred for employee records, financial data, inventory data, and purchasing data from the on-premises company server. To assess the capability level of the company's IT governance, the COBIT 2019 framework was implemented, focusing on operational and security areas. An approach was undertaken to enhance services and operations within the company. The results of the capability level measurement for process objective APO12 indicated that it has reached level 2, with a target capability level of level 3. On the other hand, process DSS01 successfully achieved level 3, meeting its target capability level, while process DSS02 reached level 2 with a target capability of level 3. This suggests that there is a 1-level gap in the APO12 and DSS02 processes. The recommendation given to the company is to concentrate on risk management, finding a balance between the costs and benefits of managing IT-related risks. Moreover, it is advised to minimize disruptions by resolving user incidents promptly.","PeriodicalId":32370,"journal":{"name":"IJISCS International Journal of Information System and Computer Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJISCS International Journal of Information System and Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56327/ijiscs.v7i2.1543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The company, which is engaged in information technology services and solutions, is facing several issues. The first problem is the absence of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for documenting IT risks. Additionally, there have been instances of system downtime on the local servers, affecting both company and client data. Furthermore, data loss has occurred for employee records, financial data, inventory data, and purchasing data from the on-premises company server. To assess the capability level of the company's IT governance, the COBIT 2019 framework was implemented, focusing on operational and security areas. An approach was undertaken to enhance services and operations within the company. The results of the capability level measurement for process objective APO12 indicated that it has reached level 2, with a target capability level of level 3. On the other hand, process DSS01 successfully achieved level 3, meeting its target capability level, while process DSS02 reached level 2 with a target capability of level 3. This suggests that there is a 1-level gap in the APO12 and DSS02 processes. The recommendation given to the company is to concentrate on risk management, finding a balance between the costs and benefits of managing IT-related risks. Moreover, it is advised to minimize disruptions by resolving user incidents promptly.
使用cobit 2019框架测量信息技术治理能力水平
这家从事信息技术服务和解决方案的公司正面临着几个问题。第一个问题是缺乏记录IT风险的标准操作程序(sop)。此外,本地服务器上还出现了系统停机的情况,影响了公司和客户端数据。此外,还发生了员工记录、财务数据、库存数据和来自本地公司服务器的采购数据的数据丢失。为了评估公司IT治理的能力水平,实施了COBIT 2019框架,重点关注运营和安全领域。采取了一种方法来加强公司内部的服务和运营。过程目标APO12的能力等级测评结果表明,该过程目标APO12已达到2级,目标能力等级为3级。另一方面,进程DSS01成功达到了3级,满足了其目标能力水平,而进程DSS02达到了2级,目标能力为3级。这表明在APO12和DSS02过程中存在1个水平的差距。给公司的建议是专注于风险管理,在管理it相关风险的成本和收益之间找到平衡。此外,建议通过及时解决用户事件来尽量减少中断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信