Unveiling the Signature of Halal Leather: A Comparative Study of Surface Morphology, Functional Groups and Thermal Characteristics

Muh Wahyu Syabani, Iswahyuni Iswahyuni, Warmiati Warmiati, Kutut Aji Prayitno, Henny Saraswati, Rahmandhika Firdauzha Hary Hernandha
{"title":"Unveiling the Signature of Halal Leather: A Comparative Study of Surface Morphology, Functional Groups and Thermal Characteristics","authors":"Muh Wahyu Syabani, Iswahyuni Iswahyuni, Warmiati Warmiati, Kutut Aji Prayitno, Henny Saraswati, Rahmandhika Firdauzha Hary Hernandha","doi":"10.15575/ijhar.v5i2.25702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The halal certification of products holds significant importance for Muslim consumers, necessitating the development of reliable techniques for identifying leather products made from raw materials. This study employed rapid and accurate analytical methods to distinguish between cowhide, pigskin, and artificial leather. A combination of scanning electron microscope (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to assess the variations in collagen fiber structures and thermal stability among the leather samples. The findings revealed that morphological surface analysis, including grain patterns and pores, facilitated swift differentiation between different leather types. Pigskins exhibit three-hole patterns on their morphological surface compared to cowhide, with random pores and tighter grain patterns, whereas artificial leather lacks natural grain patterns and pores altogether. While FTIR spectra exhibited similarities between cowhide and pigskin leathers, variations in vibration intensity enabled effective discrimination. Artificial leather, particularly PVC-based materials, displayed distinct spectra, allowing FTIR spectroscopy to effectively discern between halal and non-halal leather. Cowhide possesses strong and sharp vibration at wavenumber 1736, 1277, and 817 cm-1 compared to pigskin, which has stronger vibration at 1534 cm-1. Meanwhile, PVC-based artificial leather exhibited stretching at 1723 and 744 cm-1 wavenumbers. DSC analysis proved valuable in differentiating between genuine and artificial leather based on unique peaks and thermal behavior. These three techniques provide reliable means to determine the raw material origins of leather products.","PeriodicalId":410025,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Halal Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Halal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15575/ijhar.v5i2.25702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The halal certification of products holds significant importance for Muslim consumers, necessitating the development of reliable techniques for identifying leather products made from raw materials. This study employed rapid and accurate analytical methods to distinguish between cowhide, pigskin, and artificial leather. A combination of scanning electron microscope (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to assess the variations in collagen fiber structures and thermal stability among the leather samples. The findings revealed that morphological surface analysis, including grain patterns and pores, facilitated swift differentiation between different leather types. Pigskins exhibit three-hole patterns on their morphological surface compared to cowhide, with random pores and tighter grain patterns, whereas artificial leather lacks natural grain patterns and pores altogether. While FTIR spectra exhibited similarities between cowhide and pigskin leathers, variations in vibration intensity enabled effective discrimination. Artificial leather, particularly PVC-based materials, displayed distinct spectra, allowing FTIR spectroscopy to effectively discern between halal and non-halal leather. Cowhide possesses strong and sharp vibration at wavenumber 1736, 1277, and 817 cm-1 compared to pigskin, which has stronger vibration at 1534 cm-1. Meanwhile, PVC-based artificial leather exhibited stretching at 1723 and 744 cm-1 wavenumbers. DSC analysis proved valuable in differentiating between genuine and artificial leather based on unique peaks and thermal behavior. These three techniques provide reliable means to determine the raw material origins of leather products.
揭示清真皮革的特征:表面形貌、官能团和热特性的比较研究
产品的清真认证对穆斯林消费者具有重要意义,需要开发可靠的技术来识别由原材料制成的皮革产品。本研究采用快速、准确的分析方法对牛皮、猪皮和人造革进行了鉴别。采用扫描电镜(SEM)、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)和差示扫描量热法(DSC)分析了真皮样品中胶原纤维结构和热稳定性的变化。结果表明,形态学表面分析,包括颗粒模式和毛孔,有助于快速区分不同类型的皮革。与牛皮相比,猪皮的形态表面呈现出三孔模式,气孔随机,纹路紧密,而人造革则完全缺乏天然的纹路和气孔。虽然FTIR光谱显示了牛皮和猪皮之间的相似性,但振动强度的变化使有效的区分成为可能。人造皮革,特别是pvc基材料,显示出不同的光谱,允许FTIR光谱有效地区分清真和非清真皮革。牛皮在波数1736、1277和817 cm-1处具有较强的尖锐振动,而猪皮在1534 cm-1处具有较强的振动。同时,pvc人造革在1723和744 cm-1波数下表现出拉伸。DSC分析证明是有价值的区分真皮和人造皮革基于独特的峰和热行为。这三种技术为确定皮革制品的原材料来源提供了可靠的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信