From the Co-Editors: Being in Relationship with Citizens, Communities, and Clients in Evaluation Practice

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jori N. Hall, Laura R. Peck
{"title":"From the Co-Editors: Being in Relationship with Citizens, Communities, and Clients in Evaluation Practice","authors":"Jori N. Hall, Laura R. Peck","doi":"10.1177/10982140231205150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Issue 4 of Volume 44 marks the seventh and last issue with the two of us as Co-Editors-in-Chief. We embarked on the role in the wake of our prior editor ’ s untimely passing, not knowing each other and expecting to serve for perhaps an issue or two. During this time, we have discovered a rich partnership and also friendship. Although our predecessor George Julnes had an impact on each of us in his life through our relationships with him, it turns out that his posthumous impact is great as well — by his death bringing the two of us together. No control group needed: it is clear that the counterfactual would have been us not coming together in this role, and our professional and personal lives would have been much worse for that. This personal re fl ection also leads us to re fl ect on what we have contributed to the journal along with what we hope will come. In our time as co-editors, we have aimed to curate coherent issues of AJE that feed the intellects and souls of AJE ’ s readers. We have brought to publication important articles that re fl ect rigorous scholarship and thoughtful practice. We can take only a small bit of credit, however, with the authors and reviewers carrying the most weight for this accomplishment. After synthesizing the contributions of this issue, we close with our hopes for AJE ’ s future. This issue contains four articles, an In Memorium Section, and our annual acknowledgement of reviewers. Collectively, the articles offer insights on why and how evaluators are in relationships with citizens, communities, and clients. For example, the lead article, by Pirmin Bundi and Valérie Pattyn, offers a framework for understanding the role of the general public in evaluation, asking: What is the difference between citizens and those directly connected to or involved in the evaluation process? How do citizens contribute to evaluation? Citizens and Evaluation: A Review of Evaluation Models answers these and related questions. The study categories evaluation models, revealing the models that tend to promote public engagement. Although variations exist both within evaluation models and across different stages of the evaluation process, actor-oriented models (those focused on clients and participants)","PeriodicalId":51449,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Evaluation","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140231205150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue 4 of Volume 44 marks the seventh and last issue with the two of us as Co-Editors-in-Chief. We embarked on the role in the wake of our prior editor ’ s untimely passing, not knowing each other and expecting to serve for perhaps an issue or two. During this time, we have discovered a rich partnership and also friendship. Although our predecessor George Julnes had an impact on each of us in his life through our relationships with him, it turns out that his posthumous impact is great as well — by his death bringing the two of us together. No control group needed: it is clear that the counterfactual would have been us not coming together in this role, and our professional and personal lives would have been much worse for that. This personal re fl ection also leads us to re fl ect on what we have contributed to the journal along with what we hope will come. In our time as co-editors, we have aimed to curate coherent issues of AJE that feed the intellects and souls of AJE ’ s readers. We have brought to publication important articles that re fl ect rigorous scholarship and thoughtful practice. We can take only a small bit of credit, however, with the authors and reviewers carrying the most weight for this accomplishment. After synthesizing the contributions of this issue, we close with our hopes for AJE ’ s future. This issue contains four articles, an In Memorium Section, and our annual acknowledgement of reviewers. Collectively, the articles offer insights on why and how evaluators are in relationships with citizens, communities, and clients. For example, the lead article, by Pirmin Bundi and Valérie Pattyn, offers a framework for understanding the role of the general public in evaluation, asking: What is the difference between citizens and those directly connected to or involved in the evaluation process? How do citizens contribute to evaluation? Citizens and Evaluation: A Review of Evaluation Models answers these and related questions. The study categories evaluation models, revealing the models that tend to promote public engagement. Although variations exist both within evaluation models and across different stages of the evaluation process, actor-oriented models (those focused on clients and participants)
来自合著者:在评估实践中与公民、社区和客户保持关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Evaluation (AJE) publishes original papers about the methods, theory, practice, and findings of evaluation. The general goal of AJE is to present the best work in and about evaluation, in order to improve the knowledge base and practice of its readers. Because the field of evaluation is diverse, with different intellectual traditions, approaches to practice, and domains of application, the papers published in AJE will reflect this diversity. Nevertheless, preference is given to papers that are likely to be of interest to a wide range of evaluators and that are written to be accessible to most readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信