{"title":"Prostatakarzinom: Wie eine gezielte Strahlentherapie bei biochemischem Rezidiv das Leben nach der Operation beeinflusst","authors":"Henning Bahlburg","doi":"10.1159/000533184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Radical prostatectomy reduces mortality among patients with localized prostate cancer, however up to 35% of patients will experience biochemical recurrence, often treated with salvage radiotherapy. The objective of the study was to investigate long-term effects of salvage radiotherapy. Methods: A prospective, controlled, non-randomized trial at 14 Swedish center's including 4,003 patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy 2008-2011. A target trial emulation approach was used to identify eligible patients that was treated with salvage radiotherapy. The control group received no salvage radiotherapy. Outcomes were assessed by patient questionnaires on ordinal scales and statistical group comparisons were made using ordered logit regression with adjustment for baseline outcome and confounding factors. The primary endpoints were bowel, urinary and sexual function and bothering due to dysfunction at 8 years. Results: Eleven percent (330/3,139) of the analyzed study population received salvage radiotherapy. Fecal leakage, leakage of mucus and hematochezia were more common after receiving salvage radiotherapy compared with the control group; 4.5% versus 2.6% odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]): (1.90 [1.38; 2.62]), 6.8% versus 1.5% 4.14 (2.98; 5.76) and 8.6% versus 1.2% 4.14 (2.98; 5.76), respectively. Urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction and hematuria were more common after receiving salvage radiotherapy, 34% versus 23% 2.23 (2.65; 3.00), 65% versus 57% 1.65 (1.18; 2.29) and 16% versus 1.6% 11.17 (5.68; 21.99), respectively. Conclusion: Salvage radiotherapy was associated with increased risk for fecal leakage, hematochezia, urinary incontinence and hematuria. Our results emphasize the importance of selecting patients for salvage radiotherapy to avoid overtreatment and to give high quality pre-treatment information to ensure patients' preparedness for late side-effects.Copyright (c) 2023 Stefan Carlsson, David Bock, Anna Lantz, Eva Angenete, Katarina Koss Modig, Jonas Hugosson, Anders Bjartell, Gunnar Steineck, Peter Wiklund, Eva Haglind","PeriodicalId":477056,"journal":{"name":"Karger Kompass","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karger Kompass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Radical prostatectomy reduces mortality among patients with localized prostate cancer, however up to 35% of patients will experience biochemical recurrence, often treated with salvage radiotherapy. The objective of the study was to investigate long-term effects of salvage radiotherapy. Methods: A prospective, controlled, non-randomized trial at 14 Swedish center's including 4,003 patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy 2008-2011. A target trial emulation approach was used to identify eligible patients that was treated with salvage radiotherapy. The control group received no salvage radiotherapy. Outcomes were assessed by patient questionnaires on ordinal scales and statistical group comparisons were made using ordered logit regression with adjustment for baseline outcome and confounding factors. The primary endpoints were bowel, urinary and sexual function and bothering due to dysfunction at 8 years. Results: Eleven percent (330/3,139) of the analyzed study population received salvage radiotherapy. Fecal leakage, leakage of mucus and hematochezia were more common after receiving salvage radiotherapy compared with the control group; 4.5% versus 2.6% odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]): (1.90 [1.38; 2.62]), 6.8% versus 1.5% 4.14 (2.98; 5.76) and 8.6% versus 1.2% 4.14 (2.98; 5.76), respectively. Urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction and hematuria were more common after receiving salvage radiotherapy, 34% versus 23% 2.23 (2.65; 3.00), 65% versus 57% 1.65 (1.18; 2.29) and 16% versus 1.6% 11.17 (5.68; 21.99), respectively. Conclusion: Salvage radiotherapy was associated with increased risk for fecal leakage, hematochezia, urinary incontinence and hematuria. Our results emphasize the importance of selecting patients for salvage radiotherapy to avoid overtreatment and to give high quality pre-treatment information to ensure patients' preparedness for late side-effects.Copyright (c) 2023 Stefan Carlsson, David Bock, Anna Lantz, Eva Angenete, Katarina Koss Modig, Jonas Hugosson, Anders Bjartell, Gunnar Steineck, Peter Wiklund, Eva Haglind
目的:根治性前列腺切除术降低了局限性前列腺癌患者的死亡率,但高达35%的患者会经历生化复发,通常采用补救性放疗治疗。本研究的目的是探讨补救性放射治疗的长期效果。方法:一项前瞻性、对照、非随机试验,在瑞典14个中心进行,包括4003名计划于2008-2011年行根治性前列腺切除术的患者。目标试验模拟方法用于确定接受补救性放射治疗的合格患者。对照组不进行补救性放疗。结果通过顺序量表的患者问卷进行评估,并使用有序logit回归进行统计组比较,调整基线结果和混杂因素。主要终点为8岁时的肠道、泌尿和性功能以及因功能障碍引起的困扰。结果:11%(330/ 3139)的分析研究人群接受了补救性放疗。补救性放疗后大便漏、粘液漏、便血较对照组多见;4.5%对2.6%的优势比(95%可信区间[CI]):(1.90 [1.38;2.62]), 6.8%对1.5% 4.14 (2.98;5.76)和8.6%对1.2% 4.14 (2.98;分别为5.76)。接受补救性放疗后尿失禁、勃起功能障碍和血尿更为常见,分别为34%和23% (2.23;3.00), 65% vs 57% 1.65 (1.18;2.29)和1.6%对11.17 (5.68;分别为21.99)。结论:补救性放疗与粪漏、便血、尿失禁、血尿风险增加有关。我们的研究结果强调了选择患者进行补救性放疗的重要性,以避免过度治疗,并提供高质量的治疗前信息,以确保患者的健康;为后期副作用做好准备。版权所有(c) 2023 Stefan Carlsson, David Bock, Anna Lantz, Eva Angenete, Katarina Koss Modig, Jonas Hugosson, Anders Bjartell, Gunnar Steineck, Peter Wiklund, Eva Haglind