Drug Administration via Feeding Tube in Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-sectional Study

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Nursel SURMELİOGLU, Yaren İLERİ, H Murat GÜNDÜZ, Dilek ÖZCENGİZ
{"title":"Drug Administration via Feeding Tube in Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Nursel SURMELİOGLU, Yaren İLERİ, H Murat GÜNDÜZ, Dilek ÖZCENGİZ","doi":"10.55262/fabadeczacilik.1346677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of the administration of drugs in critically ill patients receiving enteral feeding support. .
 Materials and methods: This prospective, observational, and descriptive study was conducted in the reanimation unit of a university hospital. A clinical pharmacist on the intensive care team evaluated the drug administration of enterally fed patients at daily visits. The necessary interventions for incorrect drug administration via the feeding tube detected in the patient’s treatment were reported to the responsible physician.
 Results: Thirty patients who met the relevant criteria 2022 were included in the study. Fifteen (50%) of the patients were female, and the mean age of all patients was calculated as 49.16±20.23. It was determined that 76% of the patients received nutritional support via feding tube. The appropriateness of 74 drugs, 36 of which were different, administered via the feeding tube of these patients was evaluated. Thirty-three of the 36 medications were in solid dosage form Most of the drugs administrated by tube (94.6%) were in dose form appropriate for tube administration, whereas 17.56% of the administration method was incorrect.
 Conclusion: Unlike the recommendations, solid dosage forms are primarily applied in drug administrations made via feeding tubes. It is thought that the creation of algorithms that can be used in clinical practice for the correct method of administering the limited number of drugs available for application will contribute to the effectiveness and safety of the treatment.","PeriodicalId":36004,"journal":{"name":"Fabad Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fabad Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55262/fabadeczacilik.1346677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of the administration of drugs in critically ill patients receiving enteral feeding support. . Materials and methods: This prospective, observational, and descriptive study was conducted in the reanimation unit of a university hospital. A clinical pharmacist on the intensive care team evaluated the drug administration of enterally fed patients at daily visits. The necessary interventions for incorrect drug administration via the feeding tube detected in the patient’s treatment were reported to the responsible physician. Results: Thirty patients who met the relevant criteria 2022 were included in the study. Fifteen (50%) of the patients were female, and the mean age of all patients was calculated as 49.16±20.23. It was determined that 76% of the patients received nutritional support via feding tube. The appropriateness of 74 drugs, 36 of which were different, administered via the feeding tube of these patients was evaluated. Thirty-three of the 36 medications were in solid dosage form Most of the drugs administrated by tube (94.6%) were in dose form appropriate for tube administration, whereas 17.56% of the administration method was incorrect. Conclusion: Unlike the recommendations, solid dosage forms are primarily applied in drug administrations made via feeding tubes. It is thought that the creation of algorithms that can be used in clinical practice for the correct method of administering the limited number of drugs available for application will contribute to the effectiveness and safety of the treatment.
重症监护病房通过饲管给药:一项横断面研究
目的:本研究的目的是评价肠内喂养支持的危重患者给药的适宜性。材料和方法:这项前瞻性、观察性和描述性研究是在一所大学医院的复苏部门进行的。重症监护小组的一名临床药剂师在每日访问时评估肠内喂养患者的药物管理。在患者的治疗中发现通过饲管给药不正确的必要干预措施,报告给负责的医生。 结果:30例符合相关标准的患者纳入研究。女性15例(50%),平均年龄49.16±20.23岁。确定76%的患者通过饲管获得营养支持。评价74种药物(其中36种不同)经饲管给药的适宜性。36种药物中有33种为固体剂型,绝大多数(94.6%)的给药药物为适合管给药的剂型,而17.56%的给药方法不正确。结论:与建议不同,固体剂型主要应用于通过饲管给药。人们认为,创建可用于临床实践的算法,以确定用于应用的有限数量的药物的正确方法,将有助于治疗的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fabad Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Fabad Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The FABAD Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences is published triannually by the Society of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ankara (FABAD). All expressions of opinion and statements of supposed facts appearing in articles and/or advertisiments carried in this journal are published on the responsibility of the author and/or advertiser, anda re not to be regarded those of the Society of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ankara. The manuscript submitted to the Journal has the requirement of not being published previously and has not been submitted elsewhere. Manuscripts should be prepared in accordance with the requirements specified as given in detail in the section of “Information for Authors”. The submission of the manuscript to the Journal is not a condition for acceptance; articles are accepted or rejected on merit alone. All rights reserved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信