Basic Volleyball Technical Skills for Students: Validity and Reliability

Q2 Social Sciences
Gatot Jariono, None Nurhidayat, Eko Sudarmanto, Haris Nugroho, Uzizatun Maslikah, Indra Adi Budiman
{"title":"Basic Volleyball Technical Skills for Students: Validity and Reliability","authors":"Gatot Jariono, None Nurhidayat, Eko Sudarmanto, Haris Nugroho, Uzizatun Maslikah, Indra Adi Budiman","doi":"10.17309/tmfv.2023.5.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study purpose. The goal of this project is to provide a basic volleyball skill exam for Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta students enrolled in the Sports Education study program. Materials and methods. This work employed experimental techniques. They are testing the reliability and validity of fundamental volleyball skills for students between 18 and 24. For objectivity and validity, personal correlations are employed in data analysis, while reliability coefficients between classes are used in data analysis for reliability. The population and sample consisted of 114 students studying sports education in the first and third semesters, including 64 males and 50 females. Results. The validity value, r = 0.653, was highly significant. Additionally, the researcher’s score with tester 1’s assistance is r = 0.759, with tester 2’s assistance is r = 0.651, and the correlation coefficient between the results of assistant testers one and two is a high r = 0.686. The objectivity value of the result score for the volleyball skill instrument was r = 0.787 for the researcher and examiner one and r = 0.705 for examiner two. The correlation coefficient between assistant examiners one and two was high at r = 0.706. The motion reliability score for volleyball skills was high (r = 0.652). The volleyball skill reliability score had a very high result score of r = 0.872. Conclusions. Based on the study findings, it is clear that the accuracy test of fundamental skills is highly effective and efficient and merits being used as a benchmark instrument to assess the skills of volleyball. To improve volleyball playing abilities, further research involving various factors, including social environment, psychosocial factors, and physical condition factors by student characteristics, is necessary. However, caution is required due to the small sample sizes used in this study and the need to consider other variables.","PeriodicalId":36640,"journal":{"name":"Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna","volume":"88 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2023.5.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study purpose. The goal of this project is to provide a basic volleyball skill exam for Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta students enrolled in the Sports Education study program. Materials and methods. This work employed experimental techniques. They are testing the reliability and validity of fundamental volleyball skills for students between 18 and 24. For objectivity and validity, personal correlations are employed in data analysis, while reliability coefficients between classes are used in data analysis for reliability. The population and sample consisted of 114 students studying sports education in the first and third semesters, including 64 males and 50 females. Results. The validity value, r = 0.653, was highly significant. Additionally, the researcher’s score with tester 1’s assistance is r = 0.759, with tester 2’s assistance is r = 0.651, and the correlation coefficient between the results of assistant testers one and two is a high r = 0.686. The objectivity value of the result score for the volleyball skill instrument was r = 0.787 for the researcher and examiner one and r = 0.705 for examiner two. The correlation coefficient between assistant examiners one and two was high at r = 0.706. The motion reliability score for volleyball skills was high (r = 0.652). The volleyball skill reliability score had a very high result score of r = 0.872. Conclusions. Based on the study findings, it is clear that the accuracy test of fundamental skills is highly effective and efficient and merits being used as a benchmark instrument to assess the skills of volleyball. To improve volleyball playing abilities, further research involving various factors, including social environment, psychosocial factors, and physical condition factors by student characteristics, is necessary. However, caution is required due to the small sample sizes used in this study and the need to consider other variables.
学生排球基本技术:效度与信度
研究的目的。该项目的目标是为参加体育教育学习计划的穆罕默迪亚大学苏拉卡塔学生提供基本排球技术考试。材料和方法。这项工作采用了实验技术。他们正在测试18至24岁学生排球基本技术的信度和效度。为了客观和效度,在数据分析中采用个人相关系数,在数据分析中采用类间信度系数。人口和样本包括114名在第一学期和第三学期学习体育教育的学生,其中男性64人,女性50人。结果。效度值r = 0.653,极显著。此外,在测试者1的协助下,研究人员的得分为r = 0.759,在测试者2的协助下,研究人员的得分为r = 0.651,辅助测试者1和辅助测试者2的结果之间的相关系数很高,r = 0.686。研究人员和主考官一对排球技术量表结果得分的客观性值r = 0.787,主考官二对结果得分的客观性值r = 0.705。助理考官1和助理考官2的相关系数较高,r = 0.706。排球技能的动作信度得分较高(r = 0.652)。排球技术信度得分有很高的结果得分r = 0.872。结论。研究结果表明,基本技术准确度测试具有较高的效果和效率,可作为排球运动技术评价的基准工具。为了提高排球运动能力,有必要根据学生的特点,对社会环境、心理社会因素、身体状况因素等多方面因素进行深入研究。然而,由于本研究使用的样本量较小,需要考虑其他变量,因此需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna
Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信