Retrograde sagittal urethrography in diagnostics of urethral stricture disease: shifting the focus

Q4 Medicine
L. M. Sinelnikov, V. V. Protoshchak, P. A. Babkin, N. P. Kushnirenko, P. O. Kislitsyn, E. I. Proskurevich, T. N. Gasanbekov, D. A. Galyuk
{"title":"Retrograde sagittal urethrography in diagnostics of urethral stricture disease: shifting the focus","authors":"L. M. Sinelnikov, V. V. Protoshchak, P. A. Babkin, N. P. Kushnirenko, P. O. Kislitsyn, E. I. Proskurevich, T. N. Gasanbekov, D. A. Galyuk","doi":"10.17650/2070-9781-2023-24-3-82-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background . For over a century retrograde urethrography (RUG) has offered the key method to diagnose urethral stricture (US). The disadvantage of the technique, however, is a potential high risk to underestimate the stricture length due to distorted visualization and eventual flawed surgical planning. Aim . To consider retrograde sagittal urethrography (RSU) and how it contributes to enhancing US preoperative diagnostics and treatment efficacy in clinical practice. Materials and methods . We compared the protocols of pre-op urethrograms performed by a radiologist and a urologist to surgery protocols for both patient groups. Group 1 included 154 patients who underwent US surgical treatment from 2017 to 2021 after using RSU as a diagnostic method (positioning 90°). Group 2 comprised 142 patients presented with identical disease who received surgery between 2012 to 2016 in our hospital after RUG using traditional technique (positioning 45°). Discrepancies of 5 mm and over in stricture length measurements between radiography protocols and intraoperative data were considered a diagnostic flaw (i.e. inconsistency). Treatment efficacy was compared across both groups. Results . In 87.6 % of cases in Group 1 (RSU) protocols provided by a radiologist matched intraoperative data versus 45.7 % of cases receiving accurate protocol data in Group 2 (RUG) (χ 2 = 59.15, p <0.001). Urethrogram protocols prepared by a urologist pre-operatively were accurate in 95.4 % of cases in Group 1 versus 62.0 % in Group 2 (χ 2 = 49.11, p <0.001). The overall efficiency of surgery was higher in Group 1 (91.6 %), than in Group 2 (82.4 %) (χ 2 = 5.54, p <0.01). Conclusion . RSU is an innovative technique that allows to significantly improve the accuracy of urethral stricture length measurement, resulting in greater treatment efficiency in Group 1 of patients. The proposed urethrographic technique can be recommended as a basic diagnostic procedure for anterior US in men.","PeriodicalId":36603,"journal":{"name":"Andrologia i Genital''naa Hirurgia","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andrologia i Genital''naa Hirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2023-24-3-82-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background . For over a century retrograde urethrography (RUG) has offered the key method to diagnose urethral stricture (US). The disadvantage of the technique, however, is a potential high risk to underestimate the stricture length due to distorted visualization and eventual flawed surgical planning. Aim . To consider retrograde sagittal urethrography (RSU) and how it contributes to enhancing US preoperative diagnostics and treatment efficacy in clinical practice. Materials and methods . We compared the protocols of pre-op urethrograms performed by a radiologist and a urologist to surgery protocols for both patient groups. Group 1 included 154 patients who underwent US surgical treatment from 2017 to 2021 after using RSU as a diagnostic method (positioning 90°). Group 2 comprised 142 patients presented with identical disease who received surgery between 2012 to 2016 in our hospital after RUG using traditional technique (positioning 45°). Discrepancies of 5 mm and over in stricture length measurements between radiography protocols and intraoperative data were considered a diagnostic flaw (i.e. inconsistency). Treatment efficacy was compared across both groups. Results . In 87.6 % of cases in Group 1 (RSU) protocols provided by a radiologist matched intraoperative data versus 45.7 % of cases receiving accurate protocol data in Group 2 (RUG) (χ 2 = 59.15, p <0.001). Urethrogram protocols prepared by a urologist pre-operatively were accurate in 95.4 % of cases in Group 1 versus 62.0 % in Group 2 (χ 2 = 49.11, p <0.001). The overall efficiency of surgery was higher in Group 1 (91.6 %), than in Group 2 (82.4 %) (χ 2 = 5.54, p <0.01). Conclusion . RSU is an innovative technique that allows to significantly improve the accuracy of urethral stricture length measurement, resulting in greater treatment efficiency in Group 1 of patients. The proposed urethrographic technique can be recommended as a basic diagnostic procedure for anterior US in men.
逆行矢状尿道造影诊断尿道狭窄疾病:转移焦点
背景。一个多世纪以来,逆行尿道造影(RUG)一直是诊断尿道狭窄的关键方法。然而,该技术的缺点是由于视觉扭曲和最终的手术计划缺陷而低估狭窄长度的潜在高风险。的目标。考虑逆行矢状尿道造影(RSU)及其如何在临床实践中提高US术前诊断和治疗效果。材料和方法。我们比较了两组患者术前由放射科医生和泌尿科医生进行的尿道造影方案和手术方案。组1包括154例2017 - 2021年使用RSU作为诊断方法(定位90°)后接受美国手术治疗的患者。第二组为2012 - 2016年在我院采用传统手法(45°体位)行手术治疗的同病患者142例。x线摄影方案和术中数据之间5毫米及以上的狭窄长度测量差异被认为是诊断缺陷(即不一致)。比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果。由放射科医生提供的第一组(RSU)方案中有87.6%的病例符合术中数据,而第二组(RUG)中有45.7%的病例获得准确的方案数据(χ 2 = 59.15, p <0.001)。1组术前泌尿科医师制定的尿道造影方案准确率为95.4%,2组为62.0% (χ 2 = 49.11, p <0.001)。手术总有效率1组(91.6%)高于2组(82.4%)(χ 2 = 5.54, p <0.01)。结论。RSU是一项创新技术,可以显著提高尿道狭窄长度测量的准确性,使1组患者的治疗效率更高。建议的尿道造影技术可作为男性前路尿道结石的基本诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信