{"title":"Revisiting Inequality and Caste in State and Social Laws: Perspectives of Manu, Phule and Ambedkar","authors":"Akanksha Sanil","doi":"10.26812/caste.v4i2.502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Constitution, as a formal legal document, reflects a commitment to secure to all citizens, Equality, Justice, and Liberty, as a non-negotiable duty of the State. The nature and context of present society, however, is embedded in its socio-cultural development through civilisations. This study aims to engage with such a manifestation of state power as revealed in the text Manavdharmashastra, that marked the origin of codified social laws to derive legitimacy and establish a ‘divine’ authority to rule. Subsequently, the pioneers to critique the dysfunctions of Manu’s social laws became a subject of interrogation by social reformers like Jyotirao Phule and Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar. Methodologically, our effort will be to weave together an intertextual analysis based on scientific observation of the case of caste subaltern, through three widely acknowledged texts—Manusmriti, Phule’s Slavery (Gulamgiri), and Ambedkar’s Annihilation of Caste, on ideals of society and governance, in order to present a historical legacy into the origins of social hierarchy as an institutional mechanism to perpetuate inequality among subjects. The aim is to develop an approach to evaluate the ancient political thought of Manusmriti, and probe contradictions and realism in actions, with explicit excerpts of relevant texts, to authenticate the credibility of facts and its alignment with the central thought. The article eventually attempts to suggest alternatives to secure the vision of an ideal Indian society that aims to disintegrate the institution of caste.","PeriodicalId":72535,"journal":{"name":"Caste (Waltham, Mass.)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caste (Waltham, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26812/caste.v4i2.502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Constitution, as a formal legal document, reflects a commitment to secure to all citizens, Equality, Justice, and Liberty, as a non-negotiable duty of the State. The nature and context of present society, however, is embedded in its socio-cultural development through civilisations. This study aims to engage with such a manifestation of state power as revealed in the text Manavdharmashastra, that marked the origin of codified social laws to derive legitimacy and establish a ‘divine’ authority to rule. Subsequently, the pioneers to critique the dysfunctions of Manu’s social laws became a subject of interrogation by social reformers like Jyotirao Phule and Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar. Methodologically, our effort will be to weave together an intertextual analysis based on scientific observation of the case of caste subaltern, through three widely acknowledged texts—Manusmriti, Phule’s Slavery (Gulamgiri), and Ambedkar’s Annihilation of Caste, on ideals of society and governance, in order to present a historical legacy into the origins of social hierarchy as an institutional mechanism to perpetuate inequality among subjects. The aim is to develop an approach to evaluate the ancient political thought of Manusmriti, and probe contradictions and realism in actions, with explicit excerpts of relevant texts, to authenticate the credibility of facts and its alignment with the central thought. The article eventually attempts to suggest alternatives to secure the vision of an ideal Indian society that aims to disintegrate the institution of caste.
《宪法》作为一份正式的法律文件,反映了保障所有公民平等、公正和自由的承诺,这是国家不可推卸的责任。然而,当今社会的性质和背景是通过文明嵌入其社会文化发展的。本研究的目的是研究《Manavdharmashastra》中所揭示的国家权力的表现,这标志着编纂的社会法律的起源,以获得合法性并建立“神圣”的统治权威。随后,批评马努社会法则功能失调的先驱们成为了社会改革家如乔蒂拉奥·普勒(Jyotirao Phule)和比姆拉奥·安贝德卡尔(Bhimrao Ambedkar)博士审问的对象。在方法上,我们的努力将是通过对次等种姓案例的科学观察,通过三种广泛认可的文本——《manusmriti》、《Phule的奴隶制》(Gulamgiri)和《Ambedkar的种姓湮灭》(Annihilation of caste)——对社会和治理的理想进行互文分析,以呈现社会等级起源的历史遗产,作为一种制度机制,使主体之间的不平等永续存在。目的是发展一种评估古代政治思想的方法,并通过相关文本的明确摘录来探索行动中的矛盾和现实主义,以验证事实的可信度及其与中心思想的一致性。文章最终试图提出替代方案,以确保一个理想的印度社会的愿景,旨在瓦解种姓制度。