Options for modifying UK alcohol and tobacco tax: A rapid scoping review of the evidence over the period 1997–2018

Jenny Hatchard, Penny Buykx, Alan Brennan, Duncan Gillespie
{"title":"Options for modifying UK alcohol and tobacco tax: A rapid scoping review of the evidence over the period 1997–2018","authors":"Jenny Hatchard, Penny Buykx, Alan Brennan, Duncan Gillespie","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13379.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<ns3:p>Background Increased taxation is recognised worldwide as one of the most effective interventions for decreasing tobacco and harmful alcohol use, with many variations of policy options available. This rapid scoping review was part of a NIHR-funded project (‘SYNTAX’ 16/105/26) and was undertaken during 2018 to inform interviews to be conducted with UK public health stakeholders with expertise in alcohol and tobacco pricing policy. Methods Objectives: To synthesise evidence and debates on current and potential alcohol and tobacco taxation options for the UK, and report on the underlying objectives, evidence of effects and mediating factors. Eligibility criteria: Peer-reviewed and grey literature; published 1997–2018; English language; UK-focused; include taxation interventions for alcohol, tobacco, or both. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google, stakeholder and colleague recommendations. Charting methods Excel spreadsheet structured using PICO framework, recording source characteristics and content. Results Ninety-one sources qualified for inclusion: 49 alcohol, 36 tobacco, 6 both. Analysis identified four policy themes: changes to excise duty within existing tax structures, structural reforms, industry measures, and hypothecation of tax revenue for public benefits. For alcohol, policy options focused on raising the price of cheap, high-strength alcohol. For tobacco, policy options focused on raising the price of all tobacco products, especially the cheapest products, which are hand-rolling tobacco. For alcohol and tobacco, there were options such as levies that take money from the industries to help reduce the societal costs of their products. Due to the perceived social and economic importance of alcohol in contrast to tobacco, policy options also discussed supporting pubs and small breweries. Conclusions This review has identified a set of tax policy options for tobacco and alcohol, their objectives, evidence of effects and related mediating factors. The differences between alcohol and tobacco tax policy options and debates suggest an opportunity for cross-substance policy learning.</ns3:p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"33 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13379.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Increased taxation is recognised worldwide as one of the most effective interventions for decreasing tobacco and harmful alcohol use, with many variations of policy options available. This rapid scoping review was part of a NIHR-funded project (‘SYNTAX’ 16/105/26) and was undertaken during 2018 to inform interviews to be conducted with UK public health stakeholders with expertise in alcohol and tobacco pricing policy. Methods Objectives: To synthesise evidence and debates on current and potential alcohol and tobacco taxation options for the UK, and report on the underlying objectives, evidence of effects and mediating factors. Eligibility criteria: Peer-reviewed and grey literature; published 1997–2018; English language; UK-focused; include taxation interventions for alcohol, tobacco, or both. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google, stakeholder and colleague recommendations. Charting methods Excel spreadsheet structured using PICO framework, recording source characteristics and content. Results Ninety-one sources qualified for inclusion: 49 alcohol, 36 tobacco, 6 both. Analysis identified four policy themes: changes to excise duty within existing tax structures, structural reforms, industry measures, and hypothecation of tax revenue for public benefits. For alcohol, policy options focused on raising the price of cheap, high-strength alcohol. For tobacco, policy options focused on raising the price of all tobacco products, especially the cheapest products, which are hand-rolling tobacco. For alcohol and tobacco, there were options such as levies that take money from the industries to help reduce the societal costs of their products. Due to the perceived social and economic importance of alcohol in contrast to tobacco, policy options also discussed supporting pubs and small breweries. Conclusions This review has identified a set of tax policy options for tobacco and alcohol, their objectives, evidence of effects and related mediating factors. The differences between alcohol and tobacco tax policy options and debates suggest an opportunity for cross-substance policy learning.
修改英国酒精和烟草税的选择:1997-2018年期间证据的快速范围审查
背景增税在世界范围内被认为是减少烟草和有害酒精使用的最有效干预措施之一,有许多不同的政策选择。这项快速范围审查是国家卫生研究院资助的项目(' SYNTAX ' 16/105/26)的一部分,于2018年进行,目的是为与具有烟酒定价政策专业知识的英国公共卫生利益相关者进行访谈提供信息。方法:目的:对英国当前和潜在的烟酒税方案进行综合证据和辩论,并报告潜在目标、效果证据和中介因素。入选标准:同行评议文献和灰色文献;1997 - 2018年出版;英语语言;UK-focused;包括对酒精、烟草或两者的税收干预。证据来源:PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google,利益相关者和同事推荐。制图方法采用Excel电子表格结构,采用PICO框架,记录源特征和内容。结果91个来源符合纳入标准:酒精49个,烟草36个,两者都有6个。分析确定了四个政策主题:在现有税收结构内改变消费税、结构改革、行业措施和为公共利益抵押税收。对于酒精,政策选择侧重于提高廉价、高强度酒精的价格。对于烟草,政策选择侧重于提高所有烟草制品的价格,特别是最便宜的手工卷烟产品。对于酒精和烟草,有一些选择,比如向行业征税,以帮助降低其产品的社会成本。由于人们认识到与烟草相比,酒精在社会和经济方面具有重要意义,因此还讨论了支持酒吧和小啤酒厂的政策选择。本综述确定了一套针对烟酒的税收政策方案、其目标、效果证据和相关中介因素。酒精和烟草税政策选择和辩论之间的差异表明有机会进行跨物质政策学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信