Kebijakan Pemberian Vonis Mati Atau Pidana Mati Yang Ada di dalam Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana Ditinjau Dari Formulasi Perspektif Pembaharuan Undang-Undang No 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Wajah Hukum Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.33087/wjh.v7i2.1298
Ina Malia Putri, Yuniar Rahmatiar, Muhamad Abas
{"title":"Kebijakan Pemberian Vonis Mati Atau Pidana Mati Yang Ada di dalam Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana Ditinjau Dari Formulasi Perspektif Pembaharuan Undang-Undang No 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana","authors":"Ina Malia Putri, Yuniar Rahmatiar, Muhamad Abas","doi":"10.33087/wjh.v7i2.1298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capital punishment is a compelling and expansive type of discipline, and the discussion about the upsides and downsides of the death penalty go on today. The question of whether the death penalty should be retained in the Criminal Code or abolished in the justice system is inseparable from Indonesia's reform of criminal law, particularly through the creation of the Criminal Code. Despite the fact that its nature differs from that outlined in the Criminal Code, Indonesia will continue to use the death penalty, as evidenced by the Criminal Code Bill, which contains the death penalty. The purpose of this research is to identify the current legal formulation of death penalty policies in Indonesian criminal law and to examine the desired future legal formulation of death penalty policies in Indonesia. This study utilizes a subjective technique with a legitimate and administrative methodology as well as unmistakable scientific exploration details. According to the findings of this study, the death penalty is still regulated by Indonesian law as the primary form of punishment, resulting in disagreements between pro- and anti-death penalty groups. In the new version of Indonesian criminal law, change in death penalty policy, originally a principal punishment to become an alternative punishment . In the future, the death penalty will be a tangible expression of human rights that is in line with national and international perspectives.","PeriodicalId":283705,"journal":{"name":"Wajah Hukum","volume":"20 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wajah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v7i2.1298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Capital punishment is a compelling and expansive type of discipline, and the discussion about the upsides and downsides of the death penalty go on today. The question of whether the death penalty should be retained in the Criminal Code or abolished in the justice system is inseparable from Indonesia's reform of criminal law, particularly through the creation of the Criminal Code. Despite the fact that its nature differs from that outlined in the Criminal Code, Indonesia will continue to use the death penalty, as evidenced by the Criminal Code Bill, which contains the death penalty. The purpose of this research is to identify the current legal formulation of death penalty policies in Indonesian criminal law and to examine the desired future legal formulation of death penalty policies in Indonesia. This study utilizes a subjective technique with a legitimate and administrative methodology as well as unmistakable scientific exploration details. According to the findings of this study, the death penalty is still regulated by Indonesian law as the primary form of punishment, resulting in disagreements between pro- and anti-death penalty groups. In the new version of Indonesian criminal law, change in death penalty policy, originally a principal punishment to become an alternative punishment . In the future, the death penalty will be a tangible expression of human rights that is in line with national and international perspectives.
《刑法》中存在的死刑判决或死刑政策是基于《刑法》2023年第1年《刑法》修正观点的
死刑是一种引人注目和广泛的纪律,关于死刑的优点和缺点的讨论一直持续到今天。是否应在《刑法》中保留死刑或在司法系统中废除死刑的问题与印度尼西亚的刑法改革密不可分,特别是通过制定《刑法》。尽管死刑的性质不同于《刑法》所概述的性质,但印度尼西亚将继续使用死刑,《刑法法案》就证明了这一点,其中载有死刑。本研究的目的是确定印度尼西亚刑法中死刑政策的现行法律制定,并审查印度尼西亚死刑政策的预期未来法律制定。本研究采用主观技术,采用合法的、行政的方法,以及明确的科学探索细节。根据这项研究的结果,死刑仍然是印度尼西亚法律规定的主要惩罚形式,导致赞成和反对死刑的团体之间存在分歧。在新版印尼刑法中,改变了死刑政策,将原来的主刑变为替代刑。今后,死刑将是符合国家和国际观点的人权的具体表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信