Peranan Saksi Mahkota Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana Brigadir Joshua Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Non Self Incrimination

Bambang Sukarjono, Meirza Aulia Chairani, Angga Pramodya Pradhana, Lusi Ardiani
{"title":"Peranan Saksi Mahkota Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana Brigadir Joshua Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Non Self Incrimination","authors":"Bambang Sukarjono, Meirza Aulia Chairani, Angga Pramodya Pradhana, Lusi Ardiani","doi":"10.33319/yume.v9i1.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract-The purpose of this study was to analyze the role of the crown witness in the premeditated murder case of Brigadier Joshua associated with the principle of non-self-incrimination and the obstacles to using a crown witness in the premeditated murder case of Brigadier Joshua associated with the principle of non-self-incrimination. This writing research method uses a normative juridical method with three approaches, namely the statutory approach (statute approach), conceptual approach (conceptual approach), and case approach (case approach). The results of the research on the role of the crown witness in the premeditated murder case of Brigadier Joshua were linked to the principle of non-self-incrimination, there were five defendants who were used as crown witnesses against the other defendants namely Ferdy Sambo, Putri Candrawathi, Bripka Ricky Rizal, Strong Ma'ruf and Bharada E However, there were two defendants who refused to be the crown witness for the other defendant, namely Ferdy Sambo who refused to be a witness for Putri Candrawathi, and vice versa Putri Candrawathi refused to be a witness for Ferdy Sambo. With this in mind, there are obstacles that come from obstacles to the defendant, obstacles to evidence, and obstacles to the trial judge. Based on this study, the use of crown witnesses in court proceedings is common. Aims to open the veil of crime from the defendant who was used as a witness. However, the use of crown witnesses must still pay attention to the human rights of the accused. In criminal law theory, this provision is referred to as the principle of non-self-incrimination, namely the defendant has the right not to provide information that incriminates himself (privilege against self-incrimination), which in practice the attitude of silence and not admitting to the accused is used as an excuse or circumstance that can be aggravating for punishing the accused.","PeriodicalId":486208,"journal":{"name":"Yustisia Merdeka: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yustisia Merdeka: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v9i1.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract-The purpose of this study was to analyze the role of the crown witness in the premeditated murder case of Brigadier Joshua associated with the principle of non-self-incrimination and the obstacles to using a crown witness in the premeditated murder case of Brigadier Joshua associated with the principle of non-self-incrimination. This writing research method uses a normative juridical method with three approaches, namely the statutory approach (statute approach), conceptual approach (conceptual approach), and case approach (case approach). The results of the research on the role of the crown witness in the premeditated murder case of Brigadier Joshua were linked to the principle of non-self-incrimination, there were five defendants who were used as crown witnesses against the other defendants namely Ferdy Sambo, Putri Candrawathi, Bripka Ricky Rizal, Strong Ma'ruf and Bharada E However, there were two defendants who refused to be the crown witness for the other defendant, namely Ferdy Sambo who refused to be a witness for Putri Candrawathi, and vice versa Putri Candrawathi refused to be a witness for Ferdy Sambo. With this in mind, there are obstacles that come from obstacles to the defendant, obstacles to evidence, and obstacles to the trial judge. Based on this study, the use of crown witnesses in court proceedings is common. Aims to open the veil of crime from the defendant who was used as a witness. However, the use of crown witnesses must still pay attention to the human rights of the accused. In criminal law theory, this provision is referred to as the principle of non-self-incrimination, namely the defendant has the right not to provide information that incriminates himself (privilege against self-incrimination), which in practice the attitude of silence and not admitting to the accused is used as an excuse or circumstance that can be aggravating for punishing the accused.
乔舒亚准将蓄意谋杀刑事案件中控方证人的作用与不自证其罪原则的联系
摘要:本研究旨在分析约书亚准将基于自证不自证原则的预谋杀人案中皇冠证人的作用,以及约书亚准将基于自证不自证原则的预谋杀人案中皇冠证人的使用障碍。这种写作研究方法采用了规范性的法律方法,有三种方法,即法定方法(statute approach)、概念方法(conceptual approach)和案例方法(case approach)。对约书亚准将预谋杀人案中刑事证人作用的研究结果与不自证其罪原则有关,有五名被告被用作刑事证人,他们是Ferdy Sambo, Putri Candrawathi, Bripka Ricky Rizal, Strong Ma'ruf和Bharada E。然而,有两名被告拒绝成为另一名被告的刑事证人。即Ferdy Sambo拒绝成为Putri Candrawathi的证人,反之亦然,Putri Candrawathi拒绝成为Ferdy Sambo的证人。考虑到这一点,障碍来自于被告的障碍,证据的障碍,以及审判法官的障碍。根据这项研究,在法庭诉讼中使用王室证人是很常见的。目的是揭开被用作证人的被告的犯罪面纱。但是,使用刑事证人仍然必须注意被告人的人权。在刑法理论中,这一规定被称为不自证其罪原则,即被告有权不提供自证其罪的信息(不自证其罪的特权),而在实践中,沉默和不认罪的态度被用来作为惩罚被告的借口或情节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书