Giulia Priolo, Martina Vacondio, Stephan Dickert, Nicolao Bonini
{"title":"The influence of COVID-19 Mortality Rate Formats on Emotional Reactions, Risk perception, and self-protective Behavioral Intentions","authors":"Giulia Priolo, Martina Vacondio, Stephan Dickert, Nicolao Bonini","doi":"10.1080/13669877.2023.2259415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractWe investigated whether different Mortality Rate Formats used to express the same objective probability affected people’s Emotional reactions, Risk perception, and protective behavioral intentions. A sample from the Italian population (N = 604) was exposed to six different formats (i.e. Absolute value; Raw ratio; 1 in X; Verbal; Percentage; Probability) to report the mortality rate of COVID-19 in a between-subject design. In line with expectations, the Probability format led to lower emotional reactions compared to all the other formats. Moreover, results from a path analysis revealed that emotional reactions predicted risk perception. The Mortality Rate Formats also had an indirect effect on Behavioral Intentions to protect oneself, which was mediated by emotional reactions and risk perception. The effect sizes of these indirect effects ranged from small to medium. The direct effect of risk on intentions was found to differ among two dimensions of risk. Affective Risk led to higher Behavioral Intentions, while Deliberative Risk had the opposite effect. We discuss these results in line with the ongoing debate regarding the role played by risk scientists during the pandemic and offer practical implications for risk management during health crises like COVID-19.Keywords: Risk perceptionemotionsBehavioral IntentionscommunicationCOVID-19 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe dataset is available on the OSF platform and accessible through the following link: https://osf.io/x49uy/Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the University of Trento under Grant Bando di Ateneo COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":16975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2023.2259415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractWe investigated whether different Mortality Rate Formats used to express the same objective probability affected people’s Emotional reactions, Risk perception, and protective behavioral intentions. A sample from the Italian population (N = 604) was exposed to six different formats (i.e. Absolute value; Raw ratio; 1 in X; Verbal; Percentage; Probability) to report the mortality rate of COVID-19 in a between-subject design. In line with expectations, the Probability format led to lower emotional reactions compared to all the other formats. Moreover, results from a path analysis revealed that emotional reactions predicted risk perception. The Mortality Rate Formats also had an indirect effect on Behavioral Intentions to protect oneself, which was mediated by emotional reactions and risk perception. The effect sizes of these indirect effects ranged from small to medium. The direct effect of risk on intentions was found to differ among two dimensions of risk. Affective Risk led to higher Behavioral Intentions, while Deliberative Risk had the opposite effect. We discuss these results in line with the ongoing debate regarding the role played by risk scientists during the pandemic and offer practical implications for risk management during health crises like COVID-19.Keywords: Risk perceptionemotionsBehavioral IntentionscommunicationCOVID-19 Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe dataset is available on the OSF platform and accessible through the following link: https://osf.io/x49uy/Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the University of Trento under Grant Bando di Ateneo COVID-19.
摘要本研究探讨了表达相同客观概率的不同死亡率格式是否会影响人们的情绪反应、风险感知和保护行为意图。来自意大利人群的样本(N = 604)暴露于六种不同的格式(即绝对值;原始比例;1 in X;口头的;百分比;概率)在受试者间设计中报告COVID-19的死亡率。与预期一致,与所有其他格式相比,概率格式导致了较低的情绪反应。此外,通径分析的结果显示,情绪反应可以预测风险感知。死亡率格式对自我保护行为意图也有间接影响,这种影响是由情绪反应和风险感知介导的。这些间接效应的效应大小从小到中等不等。风险对意向的直接影响在风险的两个维度上是不同的。情感性风险导致较高的行为意向,而审慎风险则相反。我们根据正在进行的关于风险科学家在大流行期间所发挥作用的辩论来讨论这些结果,并为COVID-19等健康危机期间的风险管理提供实际意义。关键词:风险感知情绪行为意向沟通covid -19披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。数据可用性声明该数据集可在OSF平台上获得,并可通过以下链接访问:https://osf.io/x49uy/Additional information资助本工作由特伦托大学在Grant Bando di Ateneo COVID-19下支持。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Risk Research is an international journal that publishes peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research articles within the risk field from the areas of social, physical and health sciences and engineering, as well as articles related to decision making, regulation and policy issues in all disciplines. Articles will be published in English. The main aims of the Journal of Risk Research are to stimulate intellectual debate, to promote better risk management practices and to contribute to the development of risk management methodologies. Journal of Risk Research is the official journal of the Society for Risk Analysis Europe and the Society for Risk Analysis Japan.