Dread and unknown characteristics of particulate matter pollution: cognitive and affective routes to air pollution prevention

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Soo Jung Hong, Yungwook Kim
{"title":"Dread and unknown characteristics of particulate matter pollution: cognitive and affective routes to air pollution prevention","authors":"Soo Jung Hong, Yungwook Kim","doi":"10.1080/13669877.2023.2259399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study investigates the effect of dread and unknown risks on individuals’ cognitive and affective responses and decision-making related to particulate matter (PM) air pollution. In particular, we investigate how dread and unknown risks play different roles in forming the cognitive and affective routes that affect the South Korean public’s intentions to reduce PM air pollution by adopting risk mitigation behaviors. One thousand South Korean adults participated in the study via a professional research company in 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using PROCESS Marco. Indirect effects and their significance were estimated using bias-corrected bootstrap (n = 5,000 resampling) confidence intervals (CIs). According to the results, perceived dread of PM air pollution had significant and positive associations with perceived health risks and negative emotion, and perceived risks had a significant and positive association with negative emotion. Moreover, the perceived unknown-ness of PM air pollution had a significant and positive association with perceived uncertainty, which had a significant and negative association with negative emotion. Our mediation models demonstrate that the cognitive and affective routes associated with the two risk dimensions had different effects on behavioral intentions to reduce PM air pollution. These distinct cognitive and affective routes have significant theoretical implications for the effective application of the psychometric paradigm in addressing various risk-related issues. The findings also imply that an appropriate level of negative emotion is crucial to motivate the public’s engagement in risk-reduction behaviors. While employing campaign messages that integrate perceived risk and negative emotional appeals derived from dread can be effective, caution should be taken not to diminish the public’s negative emotions when addressing the risk-related uncertainty in campaigns or interventions. Overall, our findings not only have several practical implications for environmental communication strategies but also make important theoretical contributions to the literature on risk perceptions and the psychometric paradigm.Keywords: Particulate matter (PM)air pollution preventionthe psychometric paradigmdread riskunknown risknegative emotion Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (No. RS-2023-00217228).","PeriodicalId":16975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2023.2259399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis study investigates the effect of dread and unknown risks on individuals’ cognitive and affective responses and decision-making related to particulate matter (PM) air pollution. In particular, we investigate how dread and unknown risks play different roles in forming the cognitive and affective routes that affect the South Korean public’s intentions to reduce PM air pollution by adopting risk mitigation behaviors. One thousand South Korean adults participated in the study via a professional research company in 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using PROCESS Marco. Indirect effects and their significance were estimated using bias-corrected bootstrap (n = 5,000 resampling) confidence intervals (CIs). According to the results, perceived dread of PM air pollution had significant and positive associations with perceived health risks and negative emotion, and perceived risks had a significant and positive association with negative emotion. Moreover, the perceived unknown-ness of PM air pollution had a significant and positive association with perceived uncertainty, which had a significant and negative association with negative emotion. Our mediation models demonstrate that the cognitive and affective routes associated with the two risk dimensions had different effects on behavioral intentions to reduce PM air pollution. These distinct cognitive and affective routes have significant theoretical implications for the effective application of the psychometric paradigm in addressing various risk-related issues. The findings also imply that an appropriate level of negative emotion is crucial to motivate the public’s engagement in risk-reduction behaviors. While employing campaign messages that integrate perceived risk and negative emotional appeals derived from dread can be effective, caution should be taken not to diminish the public’s negative emotions when addressing the risk-related uncertainty in campaigns or interventions. Overall, our findings not only have several practical implications for environmental communication strategies but also make important theoretical contributions to the literature on risk perceptions and the psychometric paradigm.Keywords: Particulate matter (PM)air pollution preventionthe psychometric paradigmdread riskunknown risknegative emotion Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (No. RS-2023-00217228).
颗粒物污染的恐惧和未知特征:预防空气污染的认知和情感途径
摘要本研究探讨了恐惧和未知风险对个体与颗粒物(PM)空气污染相关的认知、情感反应和决策的影响。特别是,我们研究了恐惧和未知风险如何在形成影响韩国公众通过采取风险缓解行为减少PM空气污染意图的认知和情感路线中发挥不同作用。2022年,1000名韩国成年人通过专业研究公司参与了这项研究。采用PROCESS Marco进行统计分析。使用偏差校正的bootstrap (n = 5,000重采样)置信区间(ci)估计间接效应及其显著性。结果表明,对PM空气污染的感知恐惧与感知健康风险和负面情绪呈显著正相关,感知风险与感知健康风险和负面情绪呈显著正相关。此外,PM空气污染的感知未知与感知不确定性呈显著正相关,感知不确定性与负面情绪呈显著负相关。我们的中介模型表明,与两个风险维度相关的认知和情感路径对减少PM空气污染的行为意愿有不同的影响。这些不同的认知和情感路径对心理测量范式在解决各种风险相关问题中的有效应用具有重要的理论意义。研究结果还表明,适当的负面情绪水平对于激发公众参与降低风险的行为至关重要。虽然采用整合感知风险和源自恐惧的负面情绪诉求的竞选信息可能是有效的,但在处理竞选或干预中与风险相关的不确定性时,应谨慎行事,不要减少公众的负面情绪。总的来说,我们的研究结果不仅对环境沟通策略有一些实际意义,而且对风险感知和心理测量范式的文献做出了重要的理论贡献。关键词:颗粒物(PM)空气污染防治心理测量范式恐惧风险未知风险负性情绪披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突本研究由韩国国家研究基金会(NRF)资助,由韩国政府(MSIT)资助(No. 5)。rs - 2023 - 00217228)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Risk Research
Journal of Risk Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Risk Research is an international journal that publishes peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research articles within the risk field from the areas of social, physical and health sciences and engineering, as well as articles related to decision making, regulation and policy issues in all disciplines. Articles will be published in English. The main aims of the Journal of Risk Research are to stimulate intellectual debate, to promote better risk management practices and to contribute to the development of risk management methodologies. Journal of Risk Research is the official journal of the Society for Risk Analysis Europe and the Society for Risk Analysis Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信