Raquel Sanz-Camarero, Jairo Ortiz-Revilla, Ileana M. Greca
{"title":"The place of the arts within integrated education","authors":"Raquel Sanz-Camarero, Jairo Ortiz-Revilla, Ileana M. Greca","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2023.2260917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIf we are to address the complex needs of contemporary education, then reflection on the arts when talking about integrated education is somewhat logical and should be considered as one principal objective of Arts Education. Current educational policies at the international level point toward a more integrated education, however, there is no consensus over a real arts integration, nor significant reflection within the classroom. This situation has worsened over recent years, even when the arts are being incorporated in some models of integrated education in full expansion. In this study, we present a state of the question of the place of the arts in integrated education. To do so, we place arts integration within its historical context, and define and explain four major problems (instrumentalization of the arts, undervaluation of the arts, poor teacher training, neglecting evaluation). We then go on to present the significance of the arts within integration as the basic axis of the existing theoretical discourse in the literature, defining five styles of integration according to their significance (subordinated or service-based, peripheral, collaborative, leading role, artistic). Finally, we compile and discuss the main approaches to have arisen in the context of arts integration. This study may be added to the contributions in defense of arts integration, rescuing and clarifying the currently submerged and confused debate, in order to restore its full potential in accordance with the new social and political demands.Keywords: Integrated educationdisciplinary integrationarts integrationstate of the question Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Notes1 ‘The arts’, a less restrictive term widely used in the literature, is employed when discussing integration. Nevertheless, the term ‘art’ is retained whenever used in the original source material. In addition, due to the authors’ training and artistic backgrounds, some examples and references included throughout the manuscript belong to the field of visual arts.2 This contextualization is mainly based on the context of the United States, a representative country of the integrated education discourse later expanded worldwide.Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain) who financed the research project PCI2S [PDC2021-121498-I00].","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2023.2260917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
AbstractIf we are to address the complex needs of contemporary education, then reflection on the arts when talking about integrated education is somewhat logical and should be considered as one principal objective of Arts Education. Current educational policies at the international level point toward a more integrated education, however, there is no consensus over a real arts integration, nor significant reflection within the classroom. This situation has worsened over recent years, even when the arts are being incorporated in some models of integrated education in full expansion. In this study, we present a state of the question of the place of the arts in integrated education. To do so, we place arts integration within its historical context, and define and explain four major problems (instrumentalization of the arts, undervaluation of the arts, poor teacher training, neglecting evaluation). We then go on to present the significance of the arts within integration as the basic axis of the existing theoretical discourse in the literature, defining five styles of integration according to their significance (subordinated or service-based, peripheral, collaborative, leading role, artistic). Finally, we compile and discuss the main approaches to have arisen in the context of arts integration. This study may be added to the contributions in defense of arts integration, rescuing and clarifying the currently submerged and confused debate, in order to restore its full potential in accordance with the new social and political demands.Keywords: Integrated educationdisciplinary integrationarts integrationstate of the question Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Notes1 ‘The arts’, a less restrictive term widely used in the literature, is employed when discussing integration. Nevertheless, the term ‘art’ is retained whenever used in the original source material. In addition, due to the authors’ training and artistic backgrounds, some examples and references included throughout the manuscript belong to the field of visual arts.2 This contextualization is mainly based on the context of the United States, a representative country of the integrated education discourse later expanded worldwide.Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain) who financed the research project PCI2S [PDC2021-121498-I00].
期刊介绍:
Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.