The place of the arts within integrated education

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Raquel Sanz-Camarero, Jairo Ortiz-Revilla, Ileana M. Greca
{"title":"The place of the arts within integrated education","authors":"Raquel Sanz-Camarero, Jairo Ortiz-Revilla, Ileana M. Greca","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2023.2260917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIf we are to address the complex needs of contemporary education, then reflection on the arts when talking about integrated education is somewhat logical and should be considered as one principal objective of Arts Education. Current educational policies at the international level point toward a more integrated education, however, there is no consensus over a real arts integration, nor significant reflection within the classroom. This situation has worsened over recent years, even when the arts are being incorporated in some models of integrated education in full expansion. In this study, we present a state of the question of the place of the arts in integrated education. To do so, we place arts integration within its historical context, and define and explain four major problems (instrumentalization of the arts, undervaluation of the arts, poor teacher training, neglecting evaluation). We then go on to present the significance of the arts within integration as the basic axis of the existing theoretical discourse in the literature, defining five styles of integration according to their significance (subordinated or service-based, peripheral, collaborative, leading role, artistic). Finally, we compile and discuss the main approaches to have arisen in the context of arts integration. This study may be added to the contributions in defense of arts integration, rescuing and clarifying the currently submerged and confused debate, in order to restore its full potential in accordance with the new social and political demands.Keywords: Integrated educationdisciplinary integrationarts integrationstate of the question Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Notes1 ‘The arts’, a less restrictive term widely used in the literature, is employed when discussing integration. Nevertheless, the term ‘art’ is retained whenever used in the original source material. In addition, due to the authors’ training and artistic backgrounds, some examples and references included throughout the manuscript belong to the field of visual arts.2 This contextualization is mainly based on the context of the United States, a representative country of the integrated education discourse later expanded worldwide.Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain) who financed the research project PCI2S [PDC2021-121498-I00].","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2023.2260917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

AbstractIf we are to address the complex needs of contemporary education, then reflection on the arts when talking about integrated education is somewhat logical and should be considered as one principal objective of Arts Education. Current educational policies at the international level point toward a more integrated education, however, there is no consensus over a real arts integration, nor significant reflection within the classroom. This situation has worsened over recent years, even when the arts are being incorporated in some models of integrated education in full expansion. In this study, we present a state of the question of the place of the arts in integrated education. To do so, we place arts integration within its historical context, and define and explain four major problems (instrumentalization of the arts, undervaluation of the arts, poor teacher training, neglecting evaluation). We then go on to present the significance of the arts within integration as the basic axis of the existing theoretical discourse in the literature, defining five styles of integration according to their significance (subordinated or service-based, peripheral, collaborative, leading role, artistic). Finally, we compile and discuss the main approaches to have arisen in the context of arts integration. This study may be added to the contributions in defense of arts integration, rescuing and clarifying the currently submerged and confused debate, in order to restore its full potential in accordance with the new social and political demands.Keywords: Integrated educationdisciplinary integrationarts integrationstate of the question Disclosure statementThe authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Notes1 ‘The arts’, a less restrictive term widely used in the literature, is employed when discussing integration. Nevertheless, the term ‘art’ is retained whenever used in the original source material. In addition, due to the authors’ training and artistic backgrounds, some examples and references included throughout the manuscript belong to the field of visual arts.2 This contextualization is mainly based on the context of the United States, a representative country of the integrated education discourse later expanded worldwide.Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain) who financed the research project PCI2S [PDC2021-121498-I00].
艺术在综合教育中的地位
摘要:如果我们要解决当代教育的复杂需求,那么在谈论融合教育时对艺术的反思是合乎逻辑的,应该被视为艺术教育的一个主要目标。目前国际上的教育政策指向更加融合的教育,然而,对于真正的艺术融合没有达成共识,也没有在课堂上进行重要的反思。这种情况近年来恶化了,即使艺术被全面纳入一些综合教育模式。在这项研究中,我们提出了艺术在综合教育中的地位问题的状态。为了做到这一点,我们将艺术整合置于其历史背景中,并定义和解释了四个主要问题(艺术的工具化,艺术的低估,糟糕的教师培训,忽视评估)。然后,我们继续将艺术在整合中的意义作为现有文学理论话语的基本轴线,根据其重要性定义五种整合风格(从属或服务型,外围,协作,主导角色,艺术)。最后,我们整理并讨论了在艺术整合的背景下出现的主要方法。本研究可以为捍卫艺术融合、拯救和澄清目前被淹没和混乱的辩论,以恢复其根据新的社会和政治要求的全部潜力做出贡献。关键词:融合教育学科整合艺术整合问题现状披露声明作者报告无利益冲突声明。注1“艺术”是一个在文献中广泛使用的限制较少的术语,在讨论整合时使用。然而,“艺术”一词在原始材料中使用时仍然保留。此外,由于作者的训练和艺术背景,整个手稿中包含的一些例子和参考文献属于视觉艺术领域这种语境化主要基于美国的语境,美国是后来扩展到世界各地的融合教育话语的代表性国家。本研究由西班牙科学与创新部资助,该部资助了研究项目PCI2S [PDC2021-121498-I00]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts Education Policy Review
Arts Education Policy Review Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信