Changes In Bacterial Flora Of Burn Wounds And Their Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns At A Tertiary Hospital In Ghana

Naa Okaikor Addison, Albert Paintsil, Mercy Jemima Newman
{"title":"Changes In Bacterial Flora Of Burn Wounds And Their Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns At A Tertiary Hospital In Ghana","authors":"Naa Okaikor Addison, Albert Paintsil, Mercy Jemima Newman","doi":"10.60014/pmjg.v12i2.319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the time-related changes in burn wound bacteria and to determine the antibiotic susceptibilities of these bacteria. Methodology: The study was carried out over a 4-month period from September 2017 at the Burns Unit of the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra. Wound swabs were taken weekly from burn patients on admission and each patient was followed-up for a month. The swabs were cultured, and antibiotic susceptibility testing done on isolated pathogens. Results: A total of 214 wound swabs were taken from 59 patients enrolled with an overall isolation rate of 65%. Gram negative isolates predominated each week throughout the period of monitoring. The commonest bacterial isolate was P. aeruginosa which formed 51.8% of all isolates, followed by coagulase negative staphylococci 13.7%, S. aureus 10.1% and other Gram-negative bacilli. Sixty-four percent of S. aureus were resistant to cefoxitin (MRSA), and100% resistant to penicillin. Resistance to the cephalosporins and fluroquinolones was generally high among the Gram-negative bacteria. P. aeruginosa had moderate resistance to the anti-pseudomonal antibiotics. Resistance to amikacin among the Gram-negative bacteria was low. Conclusion: Burn wounds are colonized by pathogenic bacteria, some highly antibiotic-resistant. There were no significant time-related changes in bacterial flora of burn wounds.","PeriodicalId":493822,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal of Ghana","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal of Ghana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60014/pmjg.v12i2.319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the time-related changes in burn wound bacteria and to determine the antibiotic susceptibilities of these bacteria. Methodology: The study was carried out over a 4-month period from September 2017 at the Burns Unit of the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra. Wound swabs were taken weekly from burn patients on admission and each patient was followed-up for a month. The swabs were cultured, and antibiotic susceptibility testing done on isolated pathogens. Results: A total of 214 wound swabs were taken from 59 patients enrolled with an overall isolation rate of 65%. Gram negative isolates predominated each week throughout the period of monitoring. The commonest bacterial isolate was P. aeruginosa which formed 51.8% of all isolates, followed by coagulase negative staphylococci 13.7%, S. aureus 10.1% and other Gram-negative bacilli. Sixty-four percent of S. aureus were resistant to cefoxitin (MRSA), and100% resistant to penicillin. Resistance to the cephalosporins and fluroquinolones was generally high among the Gram-negative bacteria. P. aeruginosa had moderate resistance to the anti-pseudomonal antibiotics. Resistance to amikacin among the Gram-negative bacteria was low. Conclusion: Burn wounds are colonized by pathogenic bacteria, some highly antibiotic-resistant. There were no significant time-related changes in bacterial flora of burn wounds.
加纳某三级医院烧伤创面细菌菌群变化及其抗生素敏感性
目的:了解烧伤创面细菌的时间相关变化,并确定这些细菌的抗生素敏感性。方法:该研究于2017年9月在阿克拉Korle-Bu教学医院烧伤科进行,为期4个月。入院时每周采集烧伤患者伤口拭子,随访1个月。对拭子进行培养,并对分离的病原体进行抗生素敏感性试验。结果:共采集59例患者的214份伤口拭子,总体分离率为65%。革兰氏阴性分离株在整个监测期间每周占主导地位。最常见的是铜绿假单胞菌(P. aeruginosa),占51.8%,其次是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(13.7%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(10.1%)和其他革兰氏阴性杆菌。64%的金黄色葡萄球菌对头孢西丁(MRSA)耐药,对青霉素耐药100%。革兰氏阴性菌对头孢菌素和氟喹诺酮类药物的耐药性普遍较高。铜绿假单胞菌对抗假单胞菌抗生素有中等耐药性。革兰氏阴性菌对阿米卡星的耐药性较低。结论:烧伤创面有病原菌定植,部分具有高度耐药性。烧伤创面细菌菌群变化无明显的时间相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信