Noor Dalati, Ruby Barragan, Deborah Hotchkiss, Harin Lee, Sam Morin, Joshua Tellez
{"title":"Quantifying the Pervasive: How Widely Held Are Psychological Misconceptions Among Undergraduate Students?","authors":"Noor Dalati, Ruby Barragan, Deborah Hotchkiss, Harin Lee, Sam Morin, Joshua Tellez","doi":"10.54581/bhpj7713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychological misconceptions are widely held ideas that contradict current psychological research (Bensley et al., 2020). Belief in such myths contributes to introductory psychology students’ overconfidence of their prior knowledge (Bensley et al., 2015), limiting student engagement and comprehension. The present study sought to identify the prevalence and extent of community college students’ belief in psychological misconceptions in hopes of guiding educational efforts to combat these notions. Students completed an online questionnaire in a proctored environment (most typically while seated in a computer lab or classroom having Wi-Fi available), in which they were presented 14 myths and asked to label them as true or false. After rating each myth, participants were prompted to rate their confidence in their previous answer. The three main hypotheses were 1) there would be a negative correlation between the number of college psychology courses students completed and their myth belief scores, 2) psychology majors would endorse fewer myths than non-psychology majors, and 3) students who believe psychology is a science would believe in fewer myths. The first two hypotheses were not supported. However, there was a significant correlation identified for the third hypothesis. The generalizability of these findings is limited by a disproportionate number of female participants and a lack of ethnic and age diversity. Future research should replicate this study with a more diverse pool of participants. These findings suggest that instructors design interventions to target myths in the psychology courses they teach.","PeriodicalId":496855,"journal":{"name":"Psi Beta research journal brief reports","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psi Beta research journal brief reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54581/bhpj7713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Psychological misconceptions are widely held ideas that contradict current psychological research (Bensley et al., 2020). Belief in such myths contributes to introductory psychology students’ overconfidence of their prior knowledge (Bensley et al., 2015), limiting student engagement and comprehension. The present study sought to identify the prevalence and extent of community college students’ belief in psychological misconceptions in hopes of guiding educational efforts to combat these notions. Students completed an online questionnaire in a proctored environment (most typically while seated in a computer lab or classroom having Wi-Fi available), in which they were presented 14 myths and asked to label them as true or false. After rating each myth, participants were prompted to rate their confidence in their previous answer. The three main hypotheses were 1) there would be a negative correlation between the number of college psychology courses students completed and their myth belief scores, 2) psychology majors would endorse fewer myths than non-psychology majors, and 3) students who believe psychology is a science would believe in fewer myths. The first two hypotheses were not supported. However, there was a significant correlation identified for the third hypothesis. The generalizability of these findings is limited by a disproportionate number of female participants and a lack of ethnic and age diversity. Future research should replicate this study with a more diverse pool of participants. These findings suggest that instructors design interventions to target myths in the psychology courses they teach.
心理学误解是与当前心理学研究相矛盾的广泛持有的观点(Bensley等人,2020)。对这些神话的信仰导致了入门心理学学生对自己先前知识的过度自信(Bensley et al., 2015),限制了学生的参与和理解。本研究旨在确定社区大学生对心理误解的普遍程度和程度,以期指导教育工作以消除这些观念。学生们在监考环境下完成了一份在线调查问卷(最典型的是坐在有Wi-Fi的计算机实验室或教室里),他们被告知14个神话,并被要求给它们贴上真实或虚假的标签。在评估完每个神话之后,参与者被要求评估他们对之前答案的信心。三个主要假设是:1)学生完成的大学心理学课程数量与他们的神话信念得分之间存在负相关关系;2)心理学专业的学生比非心理学专业的学生更少支持神话;3)相信心理学是一门科学的学生更少相信神话。前两个假设没有得到支持。然而,在第三个假设中发现了显著的相关性。这些发现的普遍性受到女性参与者数量不成比例以及缺乏种族和年龄多样性的限制。未来的研究应该用更多样化的参与者来重复这项研究。这些发现表明,教师在他们教授的心理学课程中设计干预措施来针对神话。