Rh negativity seems to predispose to a milder COVID-19 course

Monika Paskudzka, Aleksandra Kumorek, Aleksandra Kijak, Marcin Śmiarowski, Dagmara Kogut, Milena Małecka-Giełdowska, Olga Ciepiela
{"title":"Rh negativity seems to predispose to a milder COVID-19 course","authors":"Monika Paskudzka, Aleksandra Kumorek, Aleksandra Kijak, Marcin Śmiarowski, Dagmara Kogut, Milena Małecka-Giełdowska, Olga Ciepiela","doi":"10.5603/mrj.96960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus can lead to the development of COVID-19. Currently, more than 700 million people worldwide have been diagnosed with COVID-19, of which nearly 7 million have died from the severe course of the disease. Recent reports suggest that patients with blood group A are most at risk of developing COVID-19, and people with natural anti-A antibodies (especially those with blood type 0) have a milder course of the disease. This study aimed to assess the humoral response to infection with SARS-CoV-2 depending on the patient’s blood type. Material and methods: The study group consisted of 147 patients with confirmed previous COVID-19 (convalescents) and 147 individuals who declared no previous infection with SARS-CoV-2. All enrolled subjects were blood donors registered at Regional Blood Center. The concentration of SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid antibodies was determined in the serum of the patients using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 test. The blood group was determined by a manual method using anti-A, anti-B, and anti-D monoclonal sera and A, B, and 0 standard red blood cells (RBC). Results and conclusions: Based on anti-SARS-CoV-2 detection 68 people who denied contact with SARS-CoV-2 had previous asymptomatic infection. Blood type distribution differed between the asymptomatic convalescents and the declared convalescents, p = 0.0013. People with Arh–, BRh+, BRh–, and 0Rh– blood type were more often asymptomatically infected. Moreover, the Rh- subjects more often didn’t know about the previous infection than those with Rh+, p = 0.0012. It seems that subjects with Rh– blood type have a significantly milder course of disease than Rh+.","PeriodicalId":18485,"journal":{"name":"Medical Research Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/mrj.96960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus can lead to the development of COVID-19. Currently, more than 700 million people worldwide have been diagnosed with COVID-19, of which nearly 7 million have died from the severe course of the disease. Recent reports suggest that patients with blood group A are most at risk of developing COVID-19, and people with natural anti-A antibodies (especially those with blood type 0) have a milder course of the disease. This study aimed to assess the humoral response to infection with SARS-CoV-2 depending on the patient’s blood type. Material and methods: The study group consisted of 147 patients with confirmed previous COVID-19 (convalescents) and 147 individuals who declared no previous infection with SARS-CoV-2. All enrolled subjects were blood donors registered at Regional Blood Center. The concentration of SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid antibodies was determined in the serum of the patients using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 test. The blood group was determined by a manual method using anti-A, anti-B, and anti-D monoclonal sera and A, B, and 0 standard red blood cells (RBC). Results and conclusions: Based on anti-SARS-CoV-2 detection 68 people who denied contact with SARS-CoV-2 had previous asymptomatic infection. Blood type distribution differed between the asymptomatic convalescents and the declared convalescents, p = 0.0013. People with Arh–, BRh+, BRh–, and 0Rh– blood type were more often asymptomatically infected. Moreover, the Rh- subjects more often didn’t know about the previous infection than those with Rh+, p = 0.0012. It seems that subjects with Rh– blood type have a significantly milder course of disease than Rh+.
Rh阴性似乎倾向于较温和的COVID-19病程
简介:感染SARS-CoV-2病毒可导致COVID-19的发展。目前,全世界有7亿多人被诊断患有COVID-19,其中近700万人死于该疾病的严重病程。最近的报告表明,A型血的患者患COVID-19的风险最高,而天然抗A抗体的人(特别是0型血的人)的病程较轻。本研究旨在评估根据患者血型对SARS-CoV-2感染的体液反应。材料和方法:研究组由147例既往确诊的COVID-19患者(恢复期)和147例既往未感染SARS-CoV-2的个体组成。所有受试者均为在地区血液中心登记的献血者。采用Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2试验检测患者血清中SARS-CoV-2抗核衣壳抗体的浓度。用抗a、抗B、抗d单克隆血清和a、B、0标准红细胞(RBC)手工测定血型。结果与结论:经抗新冠病毒检测,68例否认接触过新冠病毒者既往无症状感染。无症状恢复者与宣告恢复者的血型分布差异,p = 0.0013。Arh -, BRh+, BRh -和0Rh -血型的人通常无症状感染。Rh-组对既往感染的不了解程度高于Rh+组,p = 0.0012。Rh -血型的受试者似乎比Rh+血型的患者病程要轻得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信