{"title":"Engaging hearts and minds in assessment and validation research","authors":"Jonathan D. Bostic","doi":"10.1111/ssm.12621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School Science and MathematicsEarly View EDITORIAL Engaging hearts and minds in assessment and validation research Jonathan D. Bostic, Corresponding Author Jonathan D. Bostic [email protected] Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA Correspondence Jonathan D. Bostic, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Jonathan D. Bostic, Corresponding Author Jonathan D. Bostic [email protected] Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA Correspondence Jonathan D. Bostic, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 12 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12621 Ideas in this work stem from multiple grant-funded research studies supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF# 1720646; 1920621; 2100988; 2201165). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. Bostic, J. (2017). Moving forward: Instruments and opportunities for aligning current practices with testing standards. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 9(3), 109–110. Bostic, J. (2019). We can do better! Intersection Points, 44(6), 3–4. Bostic, J. (2021). Think alouds: Informing scholarship and broadening partnerships through assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 34(1), 1–9. Bostic, J., Lesseig, K., Sherman, M., & Boston, M. (2021). Classroom observation and mathematics education research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09445-0 Carney, M., Bostic, J., Krupa, E., & Shih, J. (2022). Interpretation and use statements for instruments in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(4), 334–340. Cronbach, L. J. (1988). Five perspectives on validity argument. In H. Wainer & H. Braun (Eds.), Test Validity (pp. 3–17). Erlbaum. Folger, T., Bostic, J., & Krupa, E. (2023). Defining test-score interpretation, use, and claims: Delphi study for the validity argument. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 42(3), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12569 Jonson, J. L., & Geisinger, K. F. (2022). Fairness in educational and psychological testing: Examining theoretical, research, practice, and policy implications of the 2014 standards. AERA. Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. Krupa, E., Carney, M., & Bostic, J. (2019). Approaches to instrument validation. Applied Measurement in Education, 32(1), 1–9. Lavery, M., Jong, C., Krupa, E., & Bostic, J. (2019). Developing an assessment with validity in mind. In J. Bostic, E. Krupa, & J. Shih (Eds.), Assessment in mathematics education contexts: Theoretical frameworks and new directions (pp. 12–39). Routledge. Melhuish, K., & Hicks, M. (2019). A validity argument for an undergraduate mathematics concept inventory. In J. Bostic, E. Krupa, & J. Shih (Eds.), Quantitative measures of mathematical knowledge: Research instruments and perspectives (pp. 121–151). Routledge. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know. Committee on the foundations of assessment. National Academies Press. Padilla, J.-L., & Benitez, I. (2014). Validity evidence based on response process. Psichotherma, 26(1), 136–144. Shepard, L. A. (2016). Evaluating test validity: Reprise and progress. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 23(2), 268–280. Wilson, M., & Wilmot, D. (2019). Gathering validity evidence using the BEAR assessment system (BAS): A mathematics assessment perspective. In J. Bostic, E. Krupa, & J. Shih (Eds.), Assessment in mathematics education contexts: Theoretical frameworks and new directions (pp. 63–89). Routledge. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation","PeriodicalId":47540,"journal":{"name":"School Science and Mathematics","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Science and Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
School Science and MathematicsEarly View EDITORIAL Engaging hearts and minds in assessment and validation research Jonathan D. Bostic, Corresponding Author Jonathan D. Bostic [email protected] Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA Correspondence Jonathan D. Bostic, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Jonathan D. Bostic, Corresponding Author Jonathan D. Bostic [email protected] Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA Correspondence Jonathan D. Bostic, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 12 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12621 Ideas in this work stem from multiple grant-funded research studies supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF# 1720646; 1920621; 2100988; 2201165). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. Bostic, J. (2017). Moving forward: Instruments and opportunities for aligning current practices with testing standards. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 9(3), 109–110. Bostic, J. (2019). We can do better! Intersection Points, 44(6), 3–4. Bostic, J. (2021). Think alouds: Informing scholarship and broadening partnerships through assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 34(1), 1–9. Bostic, J., Lesseig, K., Sherman, M., & Boston, M. (2021). Classroom observation and mathematics education research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09445-0 Carney, M., Bostic, J., Krupa, E., & Shih, J. (2022). Interpretation and use statements for instruments in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(4), 334–340. Cronbach, L. J. (1988). Five perspectives on validity argument. In H. Wainer & H. Braun (Eds.), Test Validity (pp. 3–17). Erlbaum. Folger, T., Bostic, J., & Krupa, E. (2023). Defining test-score interpretation, use, and claims: Delphi study for the validity argument. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 42(3), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12569 Jonson, J. L., & Geisinger, K. F. (2022). Fairness in educational and psychological testing: Examining theoretical, research, practice, and policy implications of the 2014 standards. AERA. Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. Krupa, E., Carney, M., & Bostic, J. (2019). Approaches to instrument validation. Applied Measurement in Education, 32(1), 1–9. Lavery, M., Jong, C., Krupa, E., & Bostic, J. (2019). Developing an assessment with validity in mind. In J. Bostic, E. Krupa, & J. Shih (Eds.), Assessment in mathematics education contexts: Theoretical frameworks and new directions (pp. 12–39). Routledge. Melhuish, K., & Hicks, M. (2019). A validity argument for an undergraduate mathematics concept inventory. In J. Bostic, E. Krupa, & J. Shih (Eds.), Quantitative measures of mathematical knowledge: Research instruments and perspectives (pp. 121–151). Routledge. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know. Committee on the foundations of assessment. National Academies Press. Padilla, J.-L., & Benitez, I. (2014). Validity evidence based on response process. Psichotherma, 26(1), 136–144. Shepard, L. A. (2016). Evaluating test validity: Reprise and progress. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 23(2), 268–280. Wilson, M., & Wilmot, D. (2019). Gathering validity evidence using the BEAR assessment system (BAS): A mathematics assessment perspective. In J. Bostic, E. Krupa, & J. Shih (Eds.), Assessment in mathematics education contexts: Theoretical frameworks and new directions (pp. 63–89). Routledge. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation