The Role of Sociodemographic Factors and Reflective/Critical Thinking in the Belief of Psychological Misconceptions Among Community College Students

Cecil Hatchett, Cassandra Hayashi, Ivanna Hernandez, Kirsten Christensen, Nicholas Lazaris, Jela Nebrija, Corinne Regan, Angelica Tharpe, Dylan Wikel
{"title":"The Role of Sociodemographic Factors and Reflective/Critical Thinking in the Belief of Psychological Misconceptions Among Community College Students","authors":"Cecil Hatchett, Cassandra Hayashi, Ivanna Hernandez, Kirsten Christensen, Nicholas Lazaris, Jela Nebrija, Corinne Regan, Angelica Tharpe, Dylan Wikel","doi":"10.54581/phqq9467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Misinformation has become a pervasive issue in society. In relation to human behavior and cognitive processes, psychological myths can have detrimental effects by distorting our perceptions. This study employed correlational and regression analyses with 86 community college students in Southern California to examine the relationships between sociodemographic factors, belief in psychological myths, as well as the relationship between belief strength on reflective and critical thinking measures. Correlational analyses revealed significant associations between belief in psychological myths and identification with various sociodemographic factors. Findings suggest that certain demographic characteristics may be associated with stronger inclination to believe in psychological misconceptions. There was no relationship between our measure of critical thinking and endorsement of psychological myths. Results from this study suggest a number of implications for higher education. For example, educators can design curriculum to specifically address misconceptions, foster critical thinking, and promote accurate understanding of psychological phenomena. Providing opportunities for critical thinking in higher education may be beneficial in mitigating misinformation and cultivating accurate perceptions of human behavior. Findings from the current study highlight the importance of promoting critical thinking in educational contexts to combat the spread and perpetuation of myths and misinformation, ultimately leading to a more informed and discerning society.","PeriodicalId":496855,"journal":{"name":"Psi Beta research journal brief reports","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psi Beta research journal brief reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54581/phqq9467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Misinformation has become a pervasive issue in society. In relation to human behavior and cognitive processes, psychological myths can have detrimental effects by distorting our perceptions. This study employed correlational and regression analyses with 86 community college students in Southern California to examine the relationships between sociodemographic factors, belief in psychological myths, as well as the relationship between belief strength on reflective and critical thinking measures. Correlational analyses revealed significant associations between belief in psychological myths and identification with various sociodemographic factors. Findings suggest that certain demographic characteristics may be associated with stronger inclination to believe in psychological misconceptions. There was no relationship between our measure of critical thinking and endorsement of psychological myths. Results from this study suggest a number of implications for higher education. For example, educators can design curriculum to specifically address misconceptions, foster critical thinking, and promote accurate understanding of psychological phenomena. Providing opportunities for critical thinking in higher education may be beneficial in mitigating misinformation and cultivating accurate perceptions of human behavior. Findings from the current study highlight the importance of promoting critical thinking in educational contexts to combat the spread and perpetuation of myths and misinformation, ultimately leading to a more informed and discerning society.
社会人口学因素和反思/批判性思维在社区大学生心理误解信念中的作用
错误信息已经成为社会上普遍存在的问题。就人类行为和认知过程而言,心理神话会扭曲我们的认知,从而产生有害的影响。本研究以美国南加州86名社区大学生为研究对象,采用相关分析和回归分析的方法,探讨了社会人口学因素与心理神话信仰的关系,以及信仰强度在反思性和批判性思维测试中的关系。相关分析显示,对心理神话的信仰与对各种社会人口因素的认同之间存在显著关联。研究结果表明,某些人口统计学特征可能与更倾向于相信心理误解有关。我们对批判性思维的测量和对心理学神话的认可之间没有关系。这项研究的结果对高等教育提出了一些启示。例如,教育工作者可以设计课程,专门解决误解,培养批判性思维,促进对心理现象的准确理解。在高等教育中提供批判性思维的机会可能有助于减少错误信息和培养对人类行为的准确认知。目前的研究结果强调了在教育环境中促进批判性思维的重要性,以打击神话和错误信息的传播和延续,最终导致一个更知情和更有洞察力的社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信