A Dance with Death: The Imperial War Graves Commission and Nazi Germany

Tim Grady
{"title":"A Dance with Death: The Imperial War Graves Commission and Nazi Germany","authors":"Tim Grady","doi":"10.1093/ehr/cead149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the mid-1930s, Fabian Ware and the other leading members of Britain’s Imperial War Graves Commission (IWGC) sought to strengthen relations with Nazi Germany. Their efforts are generally seen as another example of appeasement, misjudging Hitler in a search for international peace. This article, in contrast, places this relationship into a much longer history of wartime death and post-war remembrance. As was the case elsewhere, the IWGC, to the anger of some relatives of the deceased, chose not to repatriate the war dead buried in Germany, and instead concentrated them into four new British war cemeteries. This decision created a clear division between the treatment of the dead of the victors and those of the defeated. While the British and Empire dead in Germany were made more visible, Germany’s war dead buried in Britain remained in their original wartime graves and faded slowly from sight. When Hitler rose to power, the IWGC was suddenly forced to confront these disparities, particularly as Nazis in both Britain and Germany used the war graves to rally support. This article argues that the IWGC started to negotiate with the Nazi regime not to broker peace but purely to defend the cemeteries that it had placed on German soil. However, with Britain and Germany having competing narratives of war and defeat, these discussions were always doomed to fail.","PeriodicalId":184998,"journal":{"name":"The English Historical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The English Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cead149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the mid-1930s, Fabian Ware and the other leading members of Britain’s Imperial War Graves Commission (IWGC) sought to strengthen relations with Nazi Germany. Their efforts are generally seen as another example of appeasement, misjudging Hitler in a search for international peace. This article, in contrast, places this relationship into a much longer history of wartime death and post-war remembrance. As was the case elsewhere, the IWGC, to the anger of some relatives of the deceased, chose not to repatriate the war dead buried in Germany, and instead concentrated them into four new British war cemeteries. This decision created a clear division between the treatment of the dead of the victors and those of the defeated. While the British and Empire dead in Germany were made more visible, Germany’s war dead buried in Britain remained in their original wartime graves and faded slowly from sight. When Hitler rose to power, the IWGC was suddenly forced to confront these disparities, particularly as Nazis in both Britain and Germany used the war graves to rally support. This article argues that the IWGC started to negotiate with the Nazi regime not to broker peace but purely to defend the cemeteries that it had placed on German soil. However, with Britain and Germany having competing narratives of war and defeat, these discussions were always doomed to fail.
与死亡共舞:帝国战争坟墓委员会和纳粹德国
20世纪30年代中期,法比安·韦尔(Fabian Ware)和英国帝国战争坟墓委员会(Imperial War Graves Commission, IWGC)的其他主要成员试图加强与纳粹德国的关系。他们的努力通常被视为绥靖政策的另一个例子,在寻求国际和平的过程中错误地判断了希特勒。相比之下,本文将这种关系置于一个更长的战争死亡和战后纪念的历史中。与其他地方的情况一样,IWGC让一些死者亲属感到愤怒,他们选择不将埋葬在德国的战争死者遣返回国,而是将他们集中在四个新的英国战争墓地。这一决定在对待战胜国和战败国的死者方面造成了明显的分歧。虽然在德国死去的英国人和帝国的人越来越显眼,但在英国埋葬的德国战争死者仍然在他们原来的战时坟墓里,慢慢地从人们的视线中消失了。当希特勒上台后,IWGC突然被迫面对这些差异,特别是当英国和德国的纳粹利用战争坟墓来争取支持时。这篇文章认为,IWGC开始与纳粹政权谈判不是为了促成和平,而纯粹是为了保护它在德国土地上的墓地。然而,由于英国和德国对战争和失败的叙述相互矛盾,这些讨论总是注定要失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信