Cantonese culinary lexical interaction between Hong Kong and Singapore English

IF 1.2 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Hugo Wing-Yu Tam, Samuel C. S. Tsang
{"title":"Cantonese culinary lexical interaction between Hong Kong and Singapore English","authors":"Hugo Wing-Yu Tam, Samuel C. S. Tsang","doi":"10.1017/s0266078423000366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The English language continues to function as a form of linguistic capital in former British colonies. Although previous studies on World English lexicon documented how and what English lexical items entered another language, few studies have been conducted to investigate the typology of lexical interaction between two postcolonial English varieties. This paper aims to describe how Cantonese-origin English culinary lexical terms were spread from either Hong Kong or Singapore, whilst illustrating the possible multitrajectory pathways of lexical interaction in the Cantophone world by demonstrating five types of translingual practices of food words with Cantonese roots. The lexical examples of food words discussed in this paper were taken from Instagram, Google Map, Google Search, Google Trends, and Oxford English Dictionary . Drawing on the theoretical notion of the ‘sunflower model’, this qualitative study argues that Sinograph (a logographic written system; also known as Honzi ) is a space of mediation, which plays an influential role in shaping the trajectories of culinary lexical terms across multilingual Asia. Findings also suggest that individuals’ multilingual competencies and the bidirectional influences between two Sinitic varieties (Cantonese and Mandarin) could shape spelling variations and conventions in Asian Englishes.","PeriodicalId":51710,"journal":{"name":"English Today","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266078423000366","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The English language continues to function as a form of linguistic capital in former British colonies. Although previous studies on World English lexicon documented how and what English lexical items entered another language, few studies have been conducted to investigate the typology of lexical interaction between two postcolonial English varieties. This paper aims to describe how Cantonese-origin English culinary lexical terms were spread from either Hong Kong or Singapore, whilst illustrating the possible multitrajectory pathways of lexical interaction in the Cantophone world by demonstrating five types of translingual practices of food words with Cantonese roots. The lexical examples of food words discussed in this paper were taken from Instagram, Google Map, Google Search, Google Trends, and Oxford English Dictionary . Drawing on the theoretical notion of the ‘sunflower model’, this qualitative study argues that Sinograph (a logographic written system; also known as Honzi ) is a space of mediation, which plays an influential role in shaping the trajectories of culinary lexical terms across multilingual Asia. Findings also suggest that individuals’ multilingual competencies and the bidirectional influences between two Sinitic varieties (Cantonese and Mandarin) could shape spelling variations and conventions in Asian Englishes.
粤语烹饪词汇在香港和新加坡英语之间的互动
英语在前英国殖民地继续发挥着语言资本的作用。虽然以往关于世界英语词汇的研究记录了英语词汇如何以及哪些词汇进入另一种语言,但很少有研究调查两个后殖民英语变体之间的词汇互动类型。本文旨在描述源自广东话的英语烹饪词汇如何从香港或新加坡传播开来,同时通过展示五种源自广东话的食物词汇的翻译实践,说明粤语世界中词汇互动的可能的多轨迹路径。本文讨论的食物词的词汇例子取自Instagram、谷歌地图、谷歌搜索、谷歌趋势和牛津英语词典。根据“向日葵模式”的理论概念,本定性研究认为,汉字(一种象形文字系统;(也被称为Honzi)是一个调解的空间,它在塑造多语种亚洲烹饪词汇的轨迹方面发挥着重要作用。研究结果还表明,个人的多语言能力和两种汉语变体(广东话和普通话)之间的双向影响可能会形成亚洲英语的拼写变化和惯例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
English Today
English Today Multiple-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信