Who’s Cheating? Mining Patterns of Collusion from Text and Events in Online Exams

Q3 Social Sciences
Catherine Cleophas, Christoph Hönnige, Frank Meisel, Philipp Meyer
{"title":"Who’s Cheating? Mining Patterns of Collusion from Text and Events in Online Exams","authors":"Catherine Cleophas, Christoph Hönnige, Frank Meisel, Philipp Meyer","doi":"10.1287/ited.2021.0260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the COVID-19 pandemic motivated a shift to virtual teaching, exams have increasingly moved online too. Detecting cheating through collusion is not easy when tech-savvy students take online exams at home and on their own devices. Such online at-home exams may tempt students to collude and share materials and answers. However, online exams’ digital output also enables computer-aided detection of collusion patterns. This paper presents two simple data-driven techniques to analyze exam event logs and essay-form answers. Based on examples from exams in social sciences, we show that such analyses can reveal patterns of student collusion. We suggest using these patterns to quantify the degree of collusion. Finally, we summarize a set of lessons learned about designing and analyzing online exams.","PeriodicalId":37137,"journal":{"name":"INFORMS Transactions on Education","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INFORMS Transactions on Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2021.0260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic motivated a shift to virtual teaching, exams have increasingly moved online too. Detecting cheating through collusion is not easy when tech-savvy students take online exams at home and on their own devices. Such online at-home exams may tempt students to collude and share materials and answers. However, online exams’ digital output also enables computer-aided detection of collusion patterns. This paper presents two simple data-driven techniques to analyze exam event logs and essay-form answers. Based on examples from exams in social sciences, we show that such analyses can reveal patterns of student collusion. We suggest using these patterns to quantify the degree of collusion. Finally, we summarize a set of lessons learned about designing and analyzing online exams.
作弊是谁?从在线考试文本和事件中挖掘共谋模式
随着COVID-19大流行促使人们转向虚拟教学,考试也越来越多地转移到网上。当精通科技的学生在家或在自己的设备上参加在线考试时,发现串通作弊并不容易。这种在线家庭考试可能会诱使学生串通,分享材料和答案。然而,在线考试的数字输出也使计算机辅助检测串通模式成为可能。本文介绍了两种简单的数据驱动技术来分析考试事件日志和短文形式的答案。基于社会科学考试的例子,我们表明这种分析可以揭示学生勾结的模式。我们建议使用这些模式来量化串通的程度。最后,我们总结了一组关于设计和分析在线考试的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
INFORMS Transactions on Education
INFORMS Transactions on Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信