Safety Gap Factor-Based Lane-Changing Trajectory Planning Model

{"title":"Safety Gap Factor-Based Lane-Changing Trajectory Planning Model","authors":"","doi":"10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.8.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In discretionary lane changing (DLC) decision models, software-based vehicles should be controlled using safe and comfortable trajectories. The simulated lateral and longitudinal trajectories are approximate trajectories, whereas the calibrated models provide more appropriate trajectories. Very few studies have used the calibration method to find safe and comfortable lateral trajectories at the starting and ending places of lane changing (LC); however, no study has provided safe and comfortable lateral and longitudinal trajectories at these places. This study uses calibrated lateral and longitudinal trajectory models with a comfortable lateral trajectory to pinpoint the safety gap at the target lane during LC. The updated LC trajectory model, in which the adopted lateral and longitudinal trajectory parameters are calculated, is calibrated using a genetic algorithm. This study indicated that the average root mean square error (RMSE) value is 0.93 ( f ) of calibrated data decreasing more than 70%, whereas the average RMSE value of simulation data is 1.93 ( f ). Additionally, the longitudinal positions during LC have an average RMSE value of 0.93 ( f ), while the simulation model's average RMSE value is 1.94 ( f ). Depending on the dataset used, the proposed safety gap can be applied in traffic software while DLC decision models such as binary logistic and game theory models are used. Keywords: lane changing, transportation planning, gap acceptance, safety factors, game theory model. https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.8.14","PeriodicalId":15926,"journal":{"name":"湖南大学学报(自然科学版)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"湖南大学学报(自然科学版)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.8.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In discretionary lane changing (DLC) decision models, software-based vehicles should be controlled using safe and comfortable trajectories. The simulated lateral and longitudinal trajectories are approximate trajectories, whereas the calibrated models provide more appropriate trajectories. Very few studies have used the calibration method to find safe and comfortable lateral trajectories at the starting and ending places of lane changing (LC); however, no study has provided safe and comfortable lateral and longitudinal trajectories at these places. This study uses calibrated lateral and longitudinal trajectory models with a comfortable lateral trajectory to pinpoint the safety gap at the target lane during LC. The updated LC trajectory model, in which the adopted lateral and longitudinal trajectory parameters are calculated, is calibrated using a genetic algorithm. This study indicated that the average root mean square error (RMSE) value is 0.93 ( f ) of calibrated data decreasing more than 70%, whereas the average RMSE value of simulation data is 1.93 ( f ). Additionally, the longitudinal positions during LC have an average RMSE value of 0.93 ( f ), while the simulation model's average RMSE value is 1.94 ( f ). Depending on the dataset used, the proposed safety gap can be applied in traffic software while DLC decision models such as binary logistic and game theory models are used. Keywords: lane changing, transportation planning, gap acceptance, safety factors, game theory model. https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.8.14
基于安全间隙因子的变道轨迹规划模型
在自主变道决策模型中,基于软件的车辆应采用安全舒适的轨迹进行控制。模拟的横向和纵向轨迹是近似轨迹,而标定模型提供了更合适的轨迹。利用标定方法寻找安全舒适的变道起点和终点横向轨迹的研究很少;然而,没有研究在这些地方提供安全舒适的横向和纵向轨迹。本研究使用经过校准的横向和纵向轨迹模型,并采用舒适的横向轨迹来确定LC过程中目标车道的安全间隙。利用遗传算法对更新后的LC轨迹模型进行校正,计算所采用的横向和纵向轨迹参数。本研究表明,校准数据的平均均方根误差(RMSE)值为0.93 (f),下降超过70%,而模拟数据的平均RMSE值为1.93 (f)。此外,LC期间纵向位置的平均RMSE值为0.93 (f),而模拟模型的平均RMSE值为1.94 (f)。根据所使用的数据集,提出的安全缺口可以应用于交通软件,同时使用DLC决策模型,如二元逻辑和博弈论模型。关键词:变道,交通规划,间隙接受,安全因素,博弈论模型。https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.8.14
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7139
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信