Reviewing factors that predict community reintegration among the community-dwelling subacute stroke subjects: a cross-sectional study.

Q3 Medicine
Akshatha Nayak, ZK Misri, Choezom Pema, Mahima Vasyani, Bhaskaran Unnikrishnan, Abraham M. Joshua, Suruliraj Karthikbabu
{"title":"Reviewing factors that predict community reintegration among the community-dwelling subacute stroke subjects: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Akshatha Nayak, ZK Misri, Choezom Pema, Mahima Vasyani, Bhaskaran Unnikrishnan, Abraham M. Joshua, Suruliraj Karthikbabu","doi":"10.1615/critrevphysrehabilmed.2023049866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Community reintegration (CR) is an ultimate goal of stroke rehabilitation and lacks focused treatment strategies. Factors influencing the CR has been studied in the past, however, subjects were in chronic phase of recovery. Purpose: To review the factors predicting CR among community-dwelling sub-acute stroke subjects. Methods: The cross-sectional study included 92 subacute stroke subjects. Each subject was assessed for trunk control, physical function, balance self-efficacy, fear of fall, and community reintegration (CR) using trunk impairment scale, Stroke Impact Scale-16, Activity specific balance confidence scale, Falls efficacy Scale–International and Reintegration to Normal Living Index, respectively. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to associate CR with trunk control, Physical function, balance self-efficacy, fear of fall; and Mann Whitney U test was used to associate the type of stroke, side of stroke, gender, and CR. A multiple linear regression was used to find which of the factors could predict the level of CR. Results and Discussion: Age (r=-0.33), physical function (r=0.78), trunk control (r=0.58), balance self-efficacy (r=0.66) and fear of fall (r=-0.61) revealed a significant correlation (p<0.001) with CR. However, regression analysis found physical function considered to be the strongest predictor (β=0.655, p<0.001) for CR followed by age and trunk control (R2=0.638). Conclusion: Stroke rehabilitation should focus on improving the impairments affecting the physical function in the subacute phase to enhance CR. Additionally, one should try to incorporate environmental modification for the older stroke subjects.","PeriodicalId":55870,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevphysrehabilmed.2023049866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community reintegration (CR) is an ultimate goal of stroke rehabilitation and lacks focused treatment strategies. Factors influencing the CR has been studied in the past, however, subjects were in chronic phase of recovery. Purpose: To review the factors predicting CR among community-dwelling sub-acute stroke subjects. Methods: The cross-sectional study included 92 subacute stroke subjects. Each subject was assessed for trunk control, physical function, balance self-efficacy, fear of fall, and community reintegration (CR) using trunk impairment scale, Stroke Impact Scale-16, Activity specific balance confidence scale, Falls efficacy Scale–International and Reintegration to Normal Living Index, respectively. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to associate CR with trunk control, Physical function, balance self-efficacy, fear of fall; and Mann Whitney U test was used to associate the type of stroke, side of stroke, gender, and CR. A multiple linear regression was used to find which of the factors could predict the level of CR. Results and Discussion: Age (r=-0.33), physical function (r=0.78), trunk control (r=0.58), balance self-efficacy (r=0.66) and fear of fall (r=-0.61) revealed a significant correlation (p<0.001) with CR. However, regression analysis found physical function considered to be the strongest predictor (β=0.655, p<0.001) for CR followed by age and trunk control (R2=0.638). Conclusion: Stroke rehabilitation should focus on improving the impairments affecting the physical function in the subacute phase to enhance CR. Additionally, one should try to incorporate environmental modification for the older stroke subjects.
回顾预测社区居住的亚急性中风患者重新融入社区的因素:一项横断面研究。
背景:社区重返社会(CR)是脑卒中康复的最终目标,但缺乏针对性的治疗策略。以往也有研究研究过影响CR的因素,但研究对象处于慢性恢复期。目的:探讨社区亚急性脑卒中患者CR的预测因素。方法:对92例亚急性脑卒中患者进行横断面研究。分别使用躯干损伤量表、卒中影响量表-16、活动特定平衡信心量表、跌倒疗效量表-国际和重返正常生活指数对每位受试者进行躯干控制、身体功能、平衡自我效能、跌倒恐惧和社区重返社会(CR)的评估。采用Spearman秩相关法将CR与躯干控制、身体功能、平衡自我效能感、跌倒恐惧进行关联;采用Mann Whitney U检验将脑卒中类型、脑卒中侧边、性别与CR联系起来,并采用多元线性回归分析哪些因素可以预测CR水平。年龄(r=-0.33)、身体机能(r=0.78)、躯干对照(r=0.58)、平衡自我效能(r=0.66)和跌倒恐惧(r=-0.61)与CR呈显著相关(p<0.001),但回归分析发现身体机能是CR的最强预测因子(β=0.655, p<0.001),其次是年龄和躯干对照(R2=0.638)。结论:脑卒中康复应以改善亚急性期影响身体功能的功能障碍为重点,同时应结合老年脑卒中患者的环境改造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine encompasses all healing technologies other than those based on altering body chemistry (drugs) or integrity (surgery). The journal provides reviews of well-established diagnostic methods, clinical modalities and techniques and physical and rehabilitation medicine. The journal appears quarterly and includes from one to four articles that summarize and evaluate the current status of an important topic in the field of physical and rehabilitation medicine. Topics and authors are chosen by members of our distinguished Editorial Board, all of whom are leading practitioners, researchers, and active contributors to the literature in their area of expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信