Specter(s) of Care: A Symposium on Midwifery, Relationality, and Reproductive Justice To-Come

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Rodante van der Waal
{"title":"Specter(s) of Care: A Symposium on Midwifery, Relationality, and Reproductive Justice To-Come","authors":"Rodante van der Waal","doi":"10.1353/fro.2023.a902528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Nearly 2.5 thousand years ago, Plato wrote a symposium about love. This symposium was attended by Socrates, the founder of “maieutic” philosophy, a name owing to the comparison of his profession to that of his mother, a maia , meaning midwife in ancient Greek. By now, the kind of relational continuity of care that midwifery could have represented in ancient times, is something that we have long lost, if we ever had it. In most medical institutions, relational care is but a specter haunting us: something that we long for but is refused to us on account of it being a practical and material impossibility. The symposium below, written 2.5 thousand years later, is an attempt to reconceive of care for fertility, abortion, pregnancy, and parenthood. Through a combination of hauntology, critical fabulation, and decolonial empirical methodology (Rhee 2021; Gordon 2007; Hartman 2019), a specter of care is staged in the figure of midwife Phaenarete, Socrates’ mother, who is engaged in dialogue with current day midwives and mothers. Following Derrida (2006), there is only one reason to “talk” to a specter, namely if it is for a justice to-come . This notion of the “to-come” is taken seriously as the horizon of reproductive justice, invoking a direct poetics of opacity, receptivity, and creolization (Glissant 2010; 2020a; 2020b) in order to imagine relational care that can ensure reproductive justice for all .","PeriodicalId":46007,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.2023.a902528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: Nearly 2.5 thousand years ago, Plato wrote a symposium about love. This symposium was attended by Socrates, the founder of “maieutic” philosophy, a name owing to the comparison of his profession to that of his mother, a maia , meaning midwife in ancient Greek. By now, the kind of relational continuity of care that midwifery could have represented in ancient times, is something that we have long lost, if we ever had it. In most medical institutions, relational care is but a specter haunting us: something that we long for but is refused to us on account of it being a practical and material impossibility. The symposium below, written 2.5 thousand years later, is an attempt to reconceive of care for fertility, abortion, pregnancy, and parenthood. Through a combination of hauntology, critical fabulation, and decolonial empirical methodology (Rhee 2021; Gordon 2007; Hartman 2019), a specter of care is staged in the figure of midwife Phaenarete, Socrates’ mother, who is engaged in dialogue with current day midwives and mothers. Following Derrida (2006), there is only one reason to “talk” to a specter, namely if it is for a justice to-come . This notion of the “to-come” is taken seriously as the horizon of reproductive justice, invoking a direct poetics of opacity, receptivity, and creolization (Glissant 2010; 2020a; 2020b) in order to imagine relational care that can ensure reproductive justice for all .
护理的幽灵:助产、关系和生殖正义研讨会即将召开
摘要:大约2500年前,柏拉图写了一篇关于爱情的论文集。苏格拉底参加了这次研讨会,他是“maieutic”哲学的创始人,这个名字是由于他的职业与他母亲的职业相比较,maia在古希腊语中是助产士的意思。到目前为止,助产在古代可能代表的那种护理的关系连续性,如果我们曾经拥有过的话,我们早就失去了。在大多数医疗机构中,关系护理只不过是萦绕在我们心头的幽灵:我们渴望的东西,却因为它在实际和物质上不可能而被拒绝。下面的专题讨论会写于2500年后,试图重新理解生育、堕胎、怀孕和为人父母的护理。通过结合鬼魅学、批判性制造和非殖民化的经验方法(Rhee 2021;戈登2007;哈特曼(Hartman, 2019),苏格拉底的母亲,助产士费纳雷特(Phaenarete)的形象上演了一场关怀的幽灵,她正在与当今的助产士和母亲进行对话。继德里达(2006)之后,与幽灵“交谈”的理由只有一个,即如果它是为了正义的到来。这种“未来”的概念被严肃地视为生殖正义的视界,唤起了一种不透明、可接受性和克里奥尔化的直接诗学(Glissant 2010;2020年;2020b)以便设想能够确保所有人生殖公正的关系护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信