FAIRNESS AND AUTHENTICITY OF ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES USED AT THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LESOTHO AMID COVID-19: A CASE OF B.ED PRIMARY PROGRAMME

Catherine Morena Malebohang, Setho John Mokhets’engoane
{"title":"FAIRNESS AND AUTHENTICITY OF ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES USED AT THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LESOTHO AMID COVID-19: A CASE OF B.ED PRIMARY PROGRAMME","authors":"Catherine Morena Malebohang, Setho John Mokhets’engoane","doi":"10.46827/ejoe.v8i3.4970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the Covid-19 pandemic, different institutions globally introduced alternative methods such as Online Teaching and Learning (OTL) or home-based learning and testing. Despite the upsurge of Covid-19 and a shift in modality, students’ progress needed to be assessed as it determines how much students have learned. Drawing from critical pedagogy, this paper, therefore, explored the fairness and the authenticity of assessment strategies that were employed by one university in Lesotho during the Covid era. The qualitative case study research design was deployed in order to understand the views of students regarding the topic under investigation. The data were collected through a semi–structured interviews telephonically. Our sample was composed of 8 students (n=8) that were selected based on purpose. Overall, it appears that opinions are divided regarding the fairness and authenticity of assessment strategies used by NUL during the Covid-19 pandemic. While some participants did not express concern about being taught online and assessed offline, others maintained that if they were taught online, they expected to be assessed online in order to maintain fairness and authenticity. Considering these findings and the evidence currently attested by the participants of this study, one of the recommendations is that assessment expectations should be clearly communicated to the students in advance.<p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src=\"/-counters-/soc/0065/a.php\" alt=\"Hit counter\" /></p>","PeriodicalId":489372,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v8i3.4970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the Covid-19 pandemic, different institutions globally introduced alternative methods such as Online Teaching and Learning (OTL) or home-based learning and testing. Despite the upsurge of Covid-19 and a shift in modality, students’ progress needed to be assessed as it determines how much students have learned. Drawing from critical pedagogy, this paper, therefore, explored the fairness and the authenticity of assessment strategies that were employed by one university in Lesotho during the Covid era. The qualitative case study research design was deployed in order to understand the views of students regarding the topic under investigation. The data were collected through a semi–structured interviews telephonically. Our sample was composed of 8 students (n=8) that were selected based on purpose. Overall, it appears that opinions are divided regarding the fairness and authenticity of assessment strategies used by NUL during the Covid-19 pandemic. While some participants did not express concern about being taught online and assessed offline, others maintained that if they were taught online, they expected to be assessed online in order to maintain fairness and authenticity. Considering these findings and the evidence currently attested by the participants of this study, one of the recommendations is that assessment expectations should be clearly communicated to the students in advance.

Article visualizations:

Abstract Image

covid-19期间莱索托国立大学使用的评估策略的公平性和真实性:以理学士初级方案为例
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,全球不同的机构推出了在线教学(OTL)或家庭学习和测试等替代方法。尽管新冠肺炎疫情激增,教学方式也发生了转变,但仍需要评估学生的进步情况,因为这决定了学生学到了多少。因此,本文借鉴批判性教学法,探讨了莱索托一所大学在新冠疫情时期采用的评估策略的公平性和真实性。为了了解学生对调查主题的看法,采用了定性案例研究的研究设计。数据是通过半结构化的电话访谈收集的。我们的样本由8名学生(n=8)组成,他们是根据目的选择的。总的来说,对于新冠肺炎大流行期间国立大学使用的评估策略的公平性和真实性,人们的意见似乎存在分歧。虽然一些参与者并不担心在线学习和线下评估,但其他人坚持认为,如果他们在线学习,他们希望在线评估,以保持公平和真实性。考虑到这些发现和本研究参与者目前所证实的证据,其中一项建议是,应事先向学生清楚地传达评估期望。& lt; / p> & lt; p> & lt; strong>文章可视化:</strong></p>< < <img src="/-counters-/soc/0065/a.p php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信