Coping Strategies among Undergraduates of the University of Ruhuna, Southern Province, Sri Lanka, during the COVID-19 Pandemic

T. H. M. Kauashani, E. B. Weeratunga
{"title":"Coping Strategies among Undergraduates of the University of Ruhuna, Southern Province, Sri Lanka, during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"T. H. M. Kauashani, E. B. Weeratunga","doi":"10.4038/sljn.v2i1.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Undergraduates could be more prone to psychological problems than the general population when there are significant changes in the educational environment. Confined to indoors during the COVID-19 pandemic, and travel restrictions increased the strain on their mental health, severely affecting their psychological well-being and various coping mechanisms were implemented globally. This study examined the coping strategies used by undergraduates of the University of Ruhuna, Southern Province, Sri Lanka, during the COVID-19 pandemic.Method: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was done from mid-June to August 2022 using a pre-tested, self-administered questionnaire among undergraduates from randomly selected five faculties. A stratified random sample of 359 undergraduates was invited to fill the socio-demographic details and the coping strategies using the validated 25-item Brief COPE scale. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Ruhuna. Data analysis was done using SPSS (version 23.0). Descriptive statistics, Chi-square and Fisher‟s tests were used.Results: Of the sample, females (62.1%) made up the majority. The mean (±SD) age was 23.67 (±1.6) years. The mean (±SD) adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies were 31.32(±9.08) and 19.31(±5.40) respectively. Among participants, 33.2% reported using high level adaptive coping strategies whereas 9.1% of the participants used high level maladaptive coping strategies. Mostly used adaptive coping strategies were active coping, acceptance and religion while self-distraction was used as a maladaptive coping strategy.Conclusions: Undergraduates adopted more healthy coping strategies than unhealthy coping strategies. It is suggested that more emphasis should be placed on improving mental health, expanding stress management programs and counselling with innovative strategies implemented to improve psychological well-being.","PeriodicalId":104592,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lankan Journal of Nursing","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lankan Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljn.v2i1.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective: Undergraduates could be more prone to psychological problems than the general population when there are significant changes in the educational environment. Confined to indoors during the COVID-19 pandemic, and travel restrictions increased the strain on their mental health, severely affecting their psychological well-being and various coping mechanisms were implemented globally. This study examined the coping strategies used by undergraduates of the University of Ruhuna, Southern Province, Sri Lanka, during the COVID-19 pandemic.Method: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was done from mid-June to August 2022 using a pre-tested, self-administered questionnaire among undergraduates from randomly selected five faculties. A stratified random sample of 359 undergraduates was invited to fill the socio-demographic details and the coping strategies using the validated 25-item Brief COPE scale. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Ruhuna. Data analysis was done using SPSS (version 23.0). Descriptive statistics, Chi-square and Fisher‟s tests were used.Results: Of the sample, females (62.1%) made up the majority. The mean (±SD) age was 23.67 (±1.6) years. The mean (±SD) adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies were 31.32(±9.08) and 19.31(±5.40) respectively. Among participants, 33.2% reported using high level adaptive coping strategies whereas 9.1% of the participants used high level maladaptive coping strategies. Mostly used adaptive coping strategies were active coping, acceptance and religion while self-distraction was used as a maladaptive coping strategy.Conclusions: Undergraduates adopted more healthy coping strategies than unhealthy coping strategies. It is suggested that more emphasis should be placed on improving mental health, expanding stress management programs and counselling with innovative strategies implemented to improve psychological well-being.
斯里兰卡南部省鲁胡纳大学本科生在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的应对策略
背景与目的:当教育环境发生重大变化时,大学生比一般人群更容易出现心理问题。COVID-19大流行期间,他们被限制在室内,旅行限制增加了他们的心理健康压力,严重影响了他们的心理健康,全球实施了各种应对机制。本研究调查了斯里兰卡南部省鲁胡纳大学本科生在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间使用的应对策略。方法:从2022年6月中旬到8月,对随机选择的五个学院的本科生进行了一项描述性、横断面研究,使用预测试的、自我管理的问卷。采用经验证的25项简明COPE量表,对359名大学生进行分层随机抽样,填写社会人口学信息和应对策略。伦理审查委员会,联合健康科学学院,汝华大学批准。数据分析使用SPSS(23.0版)。采用描述性统计、卡方检验和Fisher检验。结果:样本中女性占多数(62.1%)。平均(±SD)年龄为23.67(±1.6)岁。适应和不良应对策略的平均值(±SD)分别为31.32(±9.08)和19.31(±5.40)。使用高水平适应性应对策略的比例为33.2%,使用高水平非适应应对策略的比例为9.1%。适应性应对策略以积极应对、接纳和宗教为主,非适应应对策略以自我干扰为主。结论:大学生采用健康应对策略多于不健康应对策略。建议应更加重视改善心理健康,扩大压力管理方案和咨询,实施创新策略,以改善心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信