A Novel Comprehensive Classification for Non-Prosthetic Peri-Implant Fractures

Surgeries Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.3390/surgeries4040052
Ludovico Lucenti, Claudia de Cristo, Luciano Costarella, Alessia Caldaci, Marco Sapienza, Gianluca Testa, Vito Pavone
{"title":"A Novel Comprehensive Classification for Non-Prosthetic Peri-Implant Fractures","authors":"Ludovico Lucenti, Claudia de Cristo, Luciano Costarella, Alessia Caldaci, Marco Sapienza, Gianluca Testa, Vito Pavone","doi":"10.3390/surgeries4040052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures (NPPIFs) are often reported mixed with periprosthetic fractures (PPFs), but they are different entities. Due to the increase in the age of the world’s population and to the intensification of surgeries for fractures, nowadays, peri-implant fractures are a very frequent entity in clinical practice, with an increasing trend expected in the future. A clear exclusive classification of NPPIFs is not reported in the literature. The aim of this study is to provide a valid comprehensive classification for all the NPPIFs. X-rays of all the peri-implant cases treated in our unit in a 3-year period were retrospectively collected. Five orthopedic surgeons reviewed 30 X-rays of NPPIFs, providing a code according to the classification proposed. After a 3-month interval, they reviewed the same X-rays. Eighteen femoral, eight humeral, and four forearm peri-implant fractures were collected and showed to the raters. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was calculated using a k-statistic, showing a moderate agreement between observers (κ = 0.73) and a substantial agreement between the observations of the same viewer (κ = 0.82). The literature lacks a comprehensive classification for peri-implant fractures that considers all the bones and all the types of implants. The proposed classification is meant to be an instrument for orthopedic surgeons to categorize these types of fractures and seems to be simple, easy to comprehend, and reproducible. This new classification can provide the orthopedic surgeon a reliable method to clearly catalogue different fractures according to the site and the implants; the physicians can use it, through a code, in clinical practice to describe an NPPIF without the need of images. Further studies may be necessary to confirm the validity and eventually to improve the suggested classification.","PeriodicalId":93623,"journal":{"name":"Surgeries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries4040052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures (NPPIFs) are often reported mixed with periprosthetic fractures (PPFs), but they are different entities. Due to the increase in the age of the world’s population and to the intensification of surgeries for fractures, nowadays, peri-implant fractures are a very frequent entity in clinical practice, with an increasing trend expected in the future. A clear exclusive classification of NPPIFs is not reported in the literature. The aim of this study is to provide a valid comprehensive classification for all the NPPIFs. X-rays of all the peri-implant cases treated in our unit in a 3-year period were retrospectively collected. Five orthopedic surgeons reviewed 30 X-rays of NPPIFs, providing a code according to the classification proposed. After a 3-month interval, they reviewed the same X-rays. Eighteen femoral, eight humeral, and four forearm peri-implant fractures were collected and showed to the raters. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was calculated using a k-statistic, showing a moderate agreement between observers (κ = 0.73) and a substantial agreement between the observations of the same viewer (κ = 0.82). The literature lacks a comprehensive classification for peri-implant fractures that considers all the bones and all the types of implants. The proposed classification is meant to be an instrument for orthopedic surgeons to categorize these types of fractures and seems to be simple, easy to comprehend, and reproducible. This new classification can provide the orthopedic surgeon a reliable method to clearly catalogue different fractures according to the site and the implants; the physicians can use it, through a code, in clinical practice to describe an NPPIF without the need of images. Further studies may be necessary to confirm the validity and eventually to improve the suggested classification.
非假体种植体周围骨折的一种新的综合分类
非假体种植体周围骨折(nppif)经常与假体周围骨折(ppf)混合报道,但它们是不同的实体。随着世界人口年龄的增长和骨折手术的加强,种植体周围骨折是临床上非常常见的骨折,预计未来会有增加的趋势。文献中没有明确的nppif的排他分类。本研究的目的是为所有nppif提供一个有效的综合分类。回顾性收集本单位3年内所有种植体周围病例的x光片。5位骨科医生回顾了30例nppif的x光片,并根据提出的分类提供了一个代码。间隔3个月后,他们重新检查了同样的x光片。收集了18个股骨、8个肱骨和4个前臂种植体周围骨折并向评分者展示。使用k统计量计算观察者之间和观察者内部的信度,显示观察者之间的适度一致性(κ = 0.73)和同一观察者的观察之间的实质性一致性(κ = 0.82)。文献缺乏考虑所有骨骼和所有种植体类型的种植体周围骨折的综合分类。所提出的分类旨在成为骨科医生对这些类型骨折进行分类的工具,并且似乎简单,易于理解和可重复性。这种新的分类方法可以为骨科医生提供一种可靠的方法,根据骨折部位和植入物对不同的骨折进行分类;医生可以通过代码在临床实践中使用它来描述NPPIF,而不需要图像。可能需要进一步的研究来确认有效性并最终改进所建议的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信