Nurses’ roles, views and knowledge regarding vaccines and vaccination: A pan-European survey

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
Ysanne de Graaf, Ber Oomen, Enrique Castro-Sanchéz, Jeannette Geelhoed, Hubertus Johannes Maria Vrijhoef
{"title":"Nurses’ roles, views and knowledge regarding vaccines and vaccination: A pan-European survey","authors":"Ysanne de Graaf, Ber Oomen, Enrique Castro-Sanchéz, Jeannette Geelhoed, Hubertus Johannes Maria Vrijhoef","doi":"10.1177/20534345231207527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Nurses play a crucial part in responding to pandemics. Not only are they often in direct contact with patients but nurses also can inform and educate the general public regarding vaccination. Mapping nurses’ preferences and knowledge on the value of vaccination can contribute to shaping policy, generate support for policy measures and help address vaccination hesitancy. Methods The present exploratory study was based on an electronic survey distributed amongst nurses working in Europe. Analysis included descriptive statistics to summarize knowledge levels, attitudes and demographics and tests for associations. Results Of 103 respondents, most assessed their knowledge about vaccines, the immune system and pathogens on a medium level. Most respondents agreed that the best policy is to leave influenza vaccination voluntary for healthcare workers and vulnerable groups, but to make COVID-19 vaccination mandatory. Country of employment of respondents was associated with their preferred policy of influenza- and COVID-19 vaccination. Most needed by nurses in the current study to increase their involvement in vaccination programs were improved perceptions amongst patients and society at large. To perform better in responding to future pandemics, the most needed type of institutional support was continuous free nursing education. Discussion This study emphasizes a need for more nurse-generated data regarding the value of vaccination. Complexity of vaccine-related decision-making was highlighted by findings that opinions of nurses on (vaccination-) policy differ between influenza- and COVID vaccines and appear to be influenced by the policy environment in their country of employment.","PeriodicalId":43751,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Coordination","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20534345231207527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction Nurses play a crucial part in responding to pandemics. Not only are they often in direct contact with patients but nurses also can inform and educate the general public regarding vaccination. Mapping nurses’ preferences and knowledge on the value of vaccination can contribute to shaping policy, generate support for policy measures and help address vaccination hesitancy. Methods The present exploratory study was based on an electronic survey distributed amongst nurses working in Europe. Analysis included descriptive statistics to summarize knowledge levels, attitudes and demographics and tests for associations. Results Of 103 respondents, most assessed their knowledge about vaccines, the immune system and pathogens on a medium level. Most respondents agreed that the best policy is to leave influenza vaccination voluntary for healthcare workers and vulnerable groups, but to make COVID-19 vaccination mandatory. Country of employment of respondents was associated with their preferred policy of influenza- and COVID-19 vaccination. Most needed by nurses in the current study to increase their involvement in vaccination programs were improved perceptions amongst patients and society at large. To perform better in responding to future pandemics, the most needed type of institutional support was continuous free nursing education. Discussion This study emphasizes a need for more nurse-generated data regarding the value of vaccination. Complexity of vaccine-related decision-making was highlighted by findings that opinions of nurses on (vaccination-) policy differ between influenza- and COVID vaccines and appear to be influenced by the policy environment in their country of employment.
护士在疫苗和疫苗接种方面的角色、观点和知识:一项泛欧调查
护士在应对流行病方面发挥着至关重要的作用。护士不仅经常与病人直接接触,而且还可以告知和教育公众接种疫苗。了解护士的偏好和对疫苗接种价值的了解有助于制定政策,为政策措施提供支持,并有助于解决疫苗接种犹豫不决的问题。方法采用电子问卷调查的方法,对在欧洲工作的护士进行探索性研究。分析包括描述性统计,以总结知识水平、态度和人口统计以及协会测试。结果在103名答复者中,大多数人对疫苗、免疫系统和病原体的知识评估处于中等水平。大多数答复者一致认为,最好的政策是医护人员和弱势群体自愿接种流感疫苗,但强制接种COVID-19疫苗。应答者的就业国家与他们偏好的流感和COVID-19疫苗接种政策有关。在目前的研究中,护士最需要的是提高他们对疫苗接种计划的参与程度,以改善患者和整个社会的认知。为了更好地应对未来的流行病,最需要的机构支持类型是持续的免费护理教育。本研究强调需要更多关于疫苗接种价值的护士生成数据。调查结果显示,护士对流感疫苗和COVID疫苗(疫苗接种)政策的看法不同,似乎受到其就业国政策环境的影响,这突显了疫苗相关决策的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Care Coordination (formerly published as the International Journal of Care Pathways) provides an international forum for the latest scientific research in care coordination. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles which describe basic research to a multidisciplinary field as well as other broader approaches and strategies hypothesized to improve care coordination. The Journal offers insightful overviews and reflections on innovation, underlying issues, and thought provoking opinion pieces in related fields. Articles from multidisciplinary fields are welcomed from leading health care academics and policy-makers. Published articles types include original research, reviews, guidelines papers, book reviews, and news items.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信