Estimation of tensile and uniaxial compressive strength of carbonate rocks from well-logging data: artificial intelligence approach

IF 2.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Ahmed Farid Ibrahim, Moaz Hiba, Salaheldin Elkatatny, Abdulwahab Ali
{"title":"Estimation of tensile and uniaxial compressive strength of carbonate rocks from well-logging data: artificial intelligence approach","authors":"Ahmed Farid Ibrahim, Moaz Hiba, Salaheldin Elkatatny, Abdulwahab Ali","doi":"10.1007/s13202-023-01707-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and tensile strength (T0) are crucial parameters in field development and excavation projects. Traditional lab-based methods for directly measuring these properties face practical challenges. Therefore, non-destructive techniques like machine learning have gained traction as innovative tools for predicting these parameters. This study leverages machine learning methods, specifically random forest (RF) and decision tree (DT), to forecast UCS and T0 using real well-logging data sourced from a Middle East reservoir. The dataset comprises 2600 data points for model development and over 600 points for validation. Sensitivity analysis identified gamma-ray, compressional time (DTC), and bulk density (ROHB) as key factors influencing the prediction. Model accuracy was assessed using the correlation coefficient ( R ) and the absolute average percentage error (AAPE) against actual parameter profiles. For UCS prediction, both RF and DT achieved R values of 0.97, with AAPE values at 0.65% for RF and 0.78% for DT. In T0 prediction, RF yielded R values of 0.99, outperforming DT's 0.93, while AAPE stood at 0.28% for RF and 1.4% for DT. These outcomes underscore the effectiveness of both models in predicting strength parameters from well-logging data, with RF demonstrating superior performance. These models offer the industry an economical and rapid tool for accurately and reliably estimating strength parameters from well-logging data.","PeriodicalId":16723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-023-01707-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and tensile strength (T0) are crucial parameters in field development and excavation projects. Traditional lab-based methods for directly measuring these properties face practical challenges. Therefore, non-destructive techniques like machine learning have gained traction as innovative tools for predicting these parameters. This study leverages machine learning methods, specifically random forest (RF) and decision tree (DT), to forecast UCS and T0 using real well-logging data sourced from a Middle East reservoir. The dataset comprises 2600 data points for model development and over 600 points for validation. Sensitivity analysis identified gamma-ray, compressional time (DTC), and bulk density (ROHB) as key factors influencing the prediction. Model accuracy was assessed using the correlation coefficient ( R ) and the absolute average percentage error (AAPE) against actual parameter profiles. For UCS prediction, both RF and DT achieved R values of 0.97, with AAPE values at 0.65% for RF and 0.78% for DT. In T0 prediction, RF yielded R values of 0.99, outperforming DT's 0.93, while AAPE stood at 0.28% for RF and 1.4% for DT. These outcomes underscore the effectiveness of both models in predicting strength parameters from well-logging data, with RF demonstrating superior performance. These models offer the industry an economical and rapid tool for accurately and reliably estimating strength parameters from well-logging data.

Abstract Image

利用测井资料估算碳酸盐岩抗拉和单轴抗压强度:人工智能方法
摘要单轴抗压强度(UCS)和抗拉强度(T0)是野外开发和开挖工程中的关键参数。传统的基于实验室的直接测量这些特性的方法面临着实际的挑战。因此,像机器学习这样的非破坏性技术已经成为预测这些参数的创新工具。本研究利用机器学习方法,特别是随机森林(RF)和决策树(DT),利用来自中东油藏的真实测井数据预测UCS和T0。该数据集包括2600个数据点用于模型开发和超过600个数据点用于验证。灵敏度分析发现,伽马射线、压缩时间(DTC)和体积密度(ROHB)是影响预测的关键因素。使用相关系数(R)和相对于实际参数剖面的绝对平均百分比误差(AAPE)来评估模型精度。对于UCS预测,RF和DT的R值均为0.97,其中RF和DT的AAPE值分别为0.65%和0.78%。在T0预测中,RF的R值为0.99,优于DT的0.93,而AAPE对RF和DT的R值分别为0.28%和1.4%。这些结果强调了两种模型在从测井数据预测强度参数方面的有效性,其中RF模型表现出更优的性能。这些模型为行业提供了一种经济、快速的工具,可以准确、可靠地从测井数据中估计强度参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is an international open access journal that publishes original and review articles as well as book reviews on leading edge studies in the field of petroleum engineering, petroleum geology and exploration geophysics and the implementation of related technologies to the development and management of oil and gas reservoirs from their discovery through their entire production cycle. Focusing on: Reservoir characterization and modeling Unconventional oil and gas reservoirs Geophysics: Acquisition and near surface Geophysics Modeling and Imaging Geophysics: Interpretation Geophysics: Processing Production Engineering Formation Evaluation Reservoir Management Petroleum Geology Enhanced Recovery Geomechanics Drilling Completions The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice as detailed here: https://www.springer.com/us/editorial-policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信