Back from the Future. Remarks on Temporality and Totality in the Birth of Classical German Philosophy

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Agustín Lucas Prestifilippo
{"title":"Back from the Future. Remarks on Temporality and Totality in the Birth of Classical German Philosophy","authors":"Agustín Lucas Prestifilippo","doi":"10.1515/humaff-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper I propose to study the different combinations between temporality and the idea of totality in the beginning of Classical German Philosophy. In order to do that I will analyze the image of liberation in the philosophical and practical articulation of a new mythology in the manuscript “The Oldest Systematic Program of German Idealism”, and the outlines of a theory of the Spirit in the documents written by Hegel in the first part of his Jena stage, more specifically, in the fragments of the period 1803/04. For this purpose I will take as specific objects the figures of an “eternal unity” [ die ewige Einheit ] to come and of an “absolute becoming” [ das absolute Werden ] of Spirit. The hypothesis I intend to develop holds that the confrontation of these two images can lead to duplicated consequences: on the one hand, this comparison would make it possible to relativize the binary readings that oppose as terms of a simple contradiction both conceptual lineages, Idealism and Romanticism. On the other hand it would express an insurmountable tension between two ways of thinking about the relationship between time and totality.","PeriodicalId":44829,"journal":{"name":"Human Affairs-Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Affairs-Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this paper I propose to study the different combinations between temporality and the idea of totality in the beginning of Classical German Philosophy. In order to do that I will analyze the image of liberation in the philosophical and practical articulation of a new mythology in the manuscript “The Oldest Systematic Program of German Idealism”, and the outlines of a theory of the Spirit in the documents written by Hegel in the first part of his Jena stage, more specifically, in the fragments of the period 1803/04. For this purpose I will take as specific objects the figures of an “eternal unity” [ die ewige Einheit ] to come and of an “absolute becoming” [ das absolute Werden ] of Spirit. The hypothesis I intend to develop holds that the confrontation of these two images can lead to duplicated consequences: on the one hand, this comparison would make it possible to relativize the binary readings that oppose as terms of a simple contradiction both conceptual lineages, Idealism and Romanticism. On the other hand it would express an insurmountable tension between two ways of thinking about the relationship between time and totality.
从未来回来。论德国古典哲学诞生中的时间性和整体性
本文拟对德国古典哲学之初的时间性与总体性观念的不同结合进行研究。为了做到这一点,我将分析《德国唯心主义最古老的系统纲领》手稿中对新神话的哲学和实践表达中解放的形象,以及黑格尔在耶拿阶段的第一部分,更具体地说,在1803/04年的片段中所写的文件中关于精神理论的概述。为了这个目的,我将把即将到来的“永恒统一”(die ewige Einheit)和精神的“绝对形成”(das absolute Werden)的形象作为具体的对象。我打算提出的假设认为,这两种形象的对抗可能导致重复的后果:一方面,这种比较将有可能相对化对立的二元解读,作为一个简单的矛盾,概念谱系,理想主义和浪漫主义。另一方面,它表达了两种思考时间与整体关系的方式之间不可克服的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信