Significance of construction sequence and the initial behaviour in concrete-faced rockfill dams

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Sachintha Tennekoon Mudiyanselage, Kushan Wijesundara, Srikanth Venkatesan, Saman De Silva, Ranjith Dissanayake, Panduka Neluwala
{"title":"Significance of construction sequence and the initial behaviour in concrete-faced rockfill dams","authors":"Sachintha Tennekoon Mudiyanselage, Kushan Wijesundara, Srikanth Venkatesan, Saman De Silva, Ranjith Dissanayake, Panduka Neluwala","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2023.2268288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finite Element Model simulations are widely used to validate experimental and field observations. Out of these, modelling and comparing the stability of dams under various loading conditions presents significant challenges for researchers and practitioners, none more than the concrete-faced rockfill dams that are present in Australia (e.g. Cethana dam) and around the globe. A review shows that the construction sequence of such dams has not been incorporated in the initial configuration of concrete-faced rockfill dams. In this research, static analysis has been conducted for 2D and 3D finite element models of the Kotmale concrete-faced rockfill dam (CFRD) with and without the construction stage. Both 2D and 3D analysis of the case study dam using MIDAS FEA NX software and static analysis have been conducted. A linear elastic material model and a nonlinear material model (Duncan and Chang EB Model) were used to model the rockfill material. The resulting deformations were compared with the in-situ measurements to identify the accuracy of the developed cases. Results show that construction stage inclusion and the nonlinear material model agree well with the in-situ measurements, warranting the need for such advancements in Finite Element Analysis. Such an inclusion can model future settlement behaviour reasonably well, which can lead to the development of appropriate management measures.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2023.2268288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Finite Element Model simulations are widely used to validate experimental and field observations. Out of these, modelling and comparing the stability of dams under various loading conditions presents significant challenges for researchers and practitioners, none more than the concrete-faced rockfill dams that are present in Australia (e.g. Cethana dam) and around the globe. A review shows that the construction sequence of such dams has not been incorporated in the initial configuration of concrete-faced rockfill dams. In this research, static analysis has been conducted for 2D and 3D finite element models of the Kotmale concrete-faced rockfill dam (CFRD) with and without the construction stage. Both 2D and 3D analysis of the case study dam using MIDAS FEA NX software and static analysis have been conducted. A linear elastic material model and a nonlinear material model (Duncan and Chang EB Model) were used to model the rockfill material. The resulting deformations were compared with the in-situ measurements to identify the accuracy of the developed cases. Results show that construction stage inclusion and the nonlinear material model agree well with the in-situ measurements, warranting the need for such advancements in Finite Element Analysis. Such an inclusion can model future settlement behaviour reasonably well, which can lead to the development of appropriate management measures.
混凝土面板堆石坝施工顺序及初始性能的意义
有限元模型模拟被广泛用于验证实验和现场观测。其中,模拟和比较水坝在各种荷载条件下的稳定性对研究人员和从业人员来说是一个重大挑战,尤其是在澳大利亚(例如Cethana水坝)和全球范围内的混凝土面堆石坝。回顾表明,这种坝的施工顺序没有被纳入混凝土面堆石坝的初始配置。本研究分别对Kotmale混凝土面板堆石坝在施工阶段和未施工阶段的二维和三维有限元模型进行了静力分析。利用MIDAS FEA NX软件对案例坝进行了二维和三维分析,并进行了静力分析。采用线性弹性材料模型和非线性材料模型(Duncan和Chang EB模型)对堆石料进行建模。将所得变形与原位测量结果进行了比较,以确定开发案例的准确性。结果表明,施工阶段夹杂物和非线性材料模型与现场测量结果吻合良好,证明了有限元分析的必要性。这样的纳入可以很好地模拟未来的定居行为,从而可以制定适当的管理措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信