Why did the ‘Square Politics’ Disappear after June 3rd Protest in 1964? A Study on the Spatial Characteristics of the Democratic Movement in Seoul in the 1960s based on GIS

혁은 권
{"title":"Why did the ‘Square Politics’ Disappear after June 3rd Protest in 1964? A Study on the Spatial Characteristics of the Democratic Movement in Seoul in the 1960s based on GIS","authors":"혁은 권","doi":"10.38080/crh.2023.08.144.381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Until now, studies of the Korean democratization movement have focused on identifying the dynamics of the movement’s agents, without analyzing how external conditions such as spatial structures and state responses intertwined with the movement’s various characteristics. As a result, the Korean democratization movement has tended to be depicted as a unidirectional process of development and the external conditions of the movement have been depicted as abstract and static. As an attempt to expand the study of democratization movements, this study analyzes the changes in the spatial characteristics of the democratization movement in Seoul in the 1960s and its background through GIS research methodology. In the field of Korean history, GIS research methodology has been mainly used to analyze pre-modern period, administrative areas, geographical boundaries, and transportation routes, but the “3.1 Movement Database” (https://db.history.go.kr/samil) released by the National Institute of Korean History in 2019 showed that GIS research methodology is a very useful tool for identifying the spatial characteristics of the movement.BRInspired by the “3.1 Movement Database”, this study organized all the raw data on the number of protest schools, protesters, and the furthest points on the way of protesters in 1960s in Seoul and displayed them on a basemap in the QGIS program. e results showed that in 1964, when martial law was declared, student protests mostly reached the city center, but from 1965 onwards, even though the scale of protests was larger and the protests lasted for a longer period of time, the density of protests in the city center was signicantly lower due to the police’s ‘school gate lockdown tactic’ using tear gas. In other words, this paper argues that the police’s newly developed riot control tactics, in addition to media control and public security incidents, were important factors in the disappearance of ‘square politics’ aer the June 3 incident.","PeriodicalId":494976,"journal":{"name":"Yeogsa bi'pyeong (Print)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeogsa bi'pyeong (Print)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38080/crh.2023.08.144.381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Until now, studies of the Korean democratization movement have focused on identifying the dynamics of the movement’s agents, without analyzing how external conditions such as spatial structures and state responses intertwined with the movement’s various characteristics. As a result, the Korean democratization movement has tended to be depicted as a unidirectional process of development and the external conditions of the movement have been depicted as abstract and static. As an attempt to expand the study of democratization movements, this study analyzes the changes in the spatial characteristics of the democratization movement in Seoul in the 1960s and its background through GIS research methodology. In the field of Korean history, GIS research methodology has been mainly used to analyze pre-modern period, administrative areas, geographical boundaries, and transportation routes, but the “3.1 Movement Database” (https://db.history.go.kr/samil) released by the National Institute of Korean History in 2019 showed that GIS research methodology is a very useful tool for identifying the spatial characteristics of the movement.BRInspired by the “3.1 Movement Database”, this study organized all the raw data on the number of protest schools, protesters, and the furthest points on the way of protesters in 1960s in Seoul and displayed them on a basemap in the QGIS program. e results showed that in 1964, when martial law was declared, student protests mostly reached the city center, but from 1965 onwards, even though the scale of protests was larger and the protests lasted for a longer period of time, the density of protests in the city center was signicantly lower due to the police’s ‘school gate lockdown tactic’ using tear gas. In other words, this paper argues that the police’s newly developed riot control tactics, in addition to media control and public security incidents, were important factors in the disappearance of ‘square politics’ aer the June 3 incident.
为什么“广场政治”在1964年6月3日抗议后消失?基于GIS的20世纪60年代首尔民主运动空间特征研究
到目前为止,对韩国民主化运动的研究主要集中在确定运动代理人的动态,而没有分析空间结构和国家反应等外部条件如何与运动的各种特征交织在一起。因此,韩国的民主化运动往往被描绘成一个单向的发展过程,运动的外部条件被描绘成抽象和静态的。作为对民主化运动研究的拓展,本研究运用GIS研究方法分析了20世纪60年代首尔民主化运动的空间特征变化及其背景。在韩国历史领域,GIS研究方法主要用于分析前现代时期、行政区域、地理边界、交通路线,但国立国史研究院2019年发布的“3.1运动数据库”(https://db.history.go.kr/samil)显示,GIS研究方法是识别运动空间特征的非常有用的工具。受“3.1运动数据库”的启发,本研究整理了1960年代首尔抗议学校、抗议者数量、抗议者路线最远点的所有原始数据,并将其显示在QGIS程序中的底图上。E结果显示,1964年宣布戒严时,学生抗议活动主要集中在市中心,但从1965年开始,尽管抗议活动规模更大,持续时间更长,但由于警方使用催泪瓦斯的“校门封锁策略”,市中心的抗议活动密度明显降低。换句话说,本文认为,除了媒体控制和公共安全事件外,警方新开发的防暴策略是“广场政治”在6月3日事件后消失的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信