Africa's Quest for Reform of the United Nations Security Council: A Just Cause Curbed by Unrealistic Proposals

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Niguse Mandefero Alene, Mohammed Seid Ali, Kebede Yimam Tadesse
{"title":"Africa's Quest for Reform of the United Nations Security Council: A Just Cause Curbed by Unrealistic Proposals","authors":"Niguse Mandefero Alene, Mohammed Seid Ali, Kebede Yimam Tadesse","doi":"10.17159/ajcr.v23i1.16785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate around viable global governance has become increasingly topical, particularly from the perspective of countries in the Global South. Concerning Africa, despite the continent's quest to reform the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), existing research has failed to comprehensively address the topic. Consequently, this article explores the arguments and challenges surrounding Africa's drive to secure a permanent voice in the UNSC. It argues that despite the enduring legacies of colonialism, neocolonial interventions, and being the primary concern of the UNSC agenda, Africa's claim for fair representation in the Council remains. The article attempts to address the research gap and contribute to the existing debate by examining why Africa has failed to be represented in the UNSC. Africa's collective initiative towards reforming the UN system is instrumental in ensuring inclusive and sustainable global governance. Nonetheless, Africa's insistence on immediate and full veto power for new entrants and its demand for representation merely through numbers inside the UN are unfeasible.","PeriodicalId":43186,"journal":{"name":"African Journal on Conflict Resolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal on Conflict Resolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/ajcr.v23i1.16785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The debate around viable global governance has become increasingly topical, particularly from the perspective of countries in the Global South. Concerning Africa, despite the continent's quest to reform the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), existing research has failed to comprehensively address the topic. Consequently, this article explores the arguments and challenges surrounding Africa's drive to secure a permanent voice in the UNSC. It argues that despite the enduring legacies of colonialism, neocolonial interventions, and being the primary concern of the UNSC agenda, Africa's claim for fair representation in the Council remains. The article attempts to address the research gap and contribute to the existing debate by examining why Africa has failed to be represented in the UNSC. Africa's collective initiative towards reforming the UN system is instrumental in ensuring inclusive and sustainable global governance. Nonetheless, Africa's insistence on immediate and full veto power for new entrants and its demand for representation merely through numbers inside the UN are unfeasible.
非洲对联合国安理会改革的追求:一项被不切实际的建议所遏制的正义事业
围绕可行的全球治理的辩论日益成为热门话题,尤其是从全球南方国家的角度来看。关于非洲,尽管非洲大陆寻求改革联合国安理会(UNSC),但现有的研究未能全面解决这个问题。因此,本文探讨了围绕非洲争取联合国安理会常任理事国席位的争论和挑战。它认为,尽管殖民主义和新殖民主义干预的遗产经久不衰,并且是联合国安理会议程的主要关切,但非洲在安理会公平代表权的要求仍然存在。这篇文章试图解决这一研究差距,并通过研究为什么非洲未能在联合国安理会中获得代表,为现有的辩论做出贡献。非洲改革联合国系统的集体倡议有助于确保包容和可持续的全球治理。尽管如此,非洲坚持要求对新成员国立即拥有完全的否决权,并要求仅仅通过联合国内部的人数来获得代表权,这些都是不可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信