Mass Parathion Poisoning and Establishment of Pesticide Control Act in Korea

Junho JUNG
{"title":"Mass Parathion Poisoning and Establishment of Pesticide Control Act in Korea","authors":"Junho JUNG","doi":"10.38080/crh.2023.08.144.356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines how poisoning and toxicity of pesticides were shaped by the introduction of organically synthesized pesticides in South Korea. In particular, the study focus on the 1956 parathion mass poisoning in Gyeongbuk Province, which resulted in a large number of deaths due to poisoning and was a direct trigger for the enactment of the Pesticide Control Act. Also, the study examine the changes in health problems and social responses to the emergence of new pesticides technologies. First, identify the policy and technological background of the introduction of new brand of organophosphate pesticides in 1950s Korea, and examine the process by which the medical understanding of pesticide poisoning was formed. The policy responses that emerged from these technical and medical understandings, as well as the processes of deliberate concealment and ignorance regarding the mass poisoning was analysed. Thus, a new technological element – organophosphate pesticides - has influenced the formation of chemical regulation in South Korea, based on previous Japanese experiences. Yet, medical knowledge and treatment options were rapidly adopted, but policy implementation had severe limitation to regulate highly toxic pesticides. Also, the Pesticide Control Act failed the address issue of pesticide poisoning as public health problem, rather creating further dilemma as Parathion became common choice of suicidal drugs.","PeriodicalId":494976,"journal":{"name":"Yeogsa bi'pyeong (Print)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeogsa bi'pyeong (Print)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38080/crh.2023.08.144.356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how poisoning and toxicity of pesticides were shaped by the introduction of organically synthesized pesticides in South Korea. In particular, the study focus on the 1956 parathion mass poisoning in Gyeongbuk Province, which resulted in a large number of deaths due to poisoning and was a direct trigger for the enactment of the Pesticide Control Act. Also, the study examine the changes in health problems and social responses to the emergence of new pesticides technologies. First, identify the policy and technological background of the introduction of new brand of organophosphate pesticides in 1950s Korea, and examine the process by which the medical understanding of pesticide poisoning was formed. The policy responses that emerged from these technical and medical understandings, as well as the processes of deliberate concealment and ignorance regarding the mass poisoning was analysed. Thus, a new technological element – organophosphate pesticides - has influenced the formation of chemical regulation in South Korea, based on previous Japanese experiences. Yet, medical knowledge and treatment options were rapidly adopted, but policy implementation had severe limitation to regulate highly toxic pesticides. Also, the Pesticide Control Act failed the address issue of pesticide poisoning as public health problem, rather creating further dilemma as Parathion became common choice of suicidal drugs.
韩国群体性对硫磷中毒与农药管制法的制定
本研究考察了韩国引入有机合成农药后农药中毒和毒性是如何形成的。特别是,1956年在庆北发生的对硫磷中毒事件,是导致大量中毒死亡的直接原因,也是制定《农药控制法》的导火线。此外,该研究还调查了健康问题的变化和对新农药技术出现的社会反应。首先,确定20世纪50年代韩国引入新品牌有机磷农药的政策和技术背景,并检查农药中毒医学认识形成的过程。分析了从这些技术和医学理解中产生的政策反应,以及对大规模中毒的故意隐瞒和无知的过程。因此,一项新的技术要素——有机磷农药——在日本以往经验的基础上影响了韩国化学法规的形成。然而,医学知识和治疗方案被迅速采用,但政策执行对高毒农药的监管存在严重限制。此外,《农药控制法》未能将农药中毒问题作为公共卫生问题加以解决,反而造成了进一步的困境,因为对硫磷成为自杀药物的普遍选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信