Validation of the Italian version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in routine clinical practice in community dweller older adults residing in the central area of Sicily

Eduardo Cumbo, Daniela Migliore, Salvatore Torregrossa
{"title":"Validation of the Italian version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in routine clinical practice in community dweller older adults residing in the central area of Sicily","authors":"Eduardo Cumbo, Daniela Migliore, Salvatore Torregrossa","doi":"10.56769/ijpn09201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background/Objective: The aim of the study was to examine Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) performance in subjects with normal global cognition according to the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) in routine clinical practice. Methods: This was a prospective, clinical validation study in 302 consecutive subjects, referring to our dementia centre for suspected cognitive impairment over a six-month period. The MMSE and the MoCA were administered within two hours of each other. Results: 184 (60.91%) of 302 evaluated subjects with a MMSE score between 26 and 30/30 had a pathological MoCA score (< 26). 112/184 (60.84%) patients with a MMSE score between 26 and 29/30 obtained MoCA scores below the norm; 72/184 (39.13%) patients with a 30/30 MMSE had a MoCA score below the norm. Recall (p <.0001) and attention (p<.0001) were the domains that differed significantly on the two screening instruments. Conclusion: The additional use of MoCA, as a global assessment tool for the initial screening process, has allowed the identification of patients with cognitive deficit, despite their performance at MMSE had been the norm. Keywords: MoCA, MMSE, Cognitive Screening Test.","PeriodicalId":92534,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychology and neuroscience","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56769/ijpn09201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background/Objective: The aim of the study was to examine Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) performance in subjects with normal global cognition according to the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) in routine clinical practice. Methods: This was a prospective, clinical validation study in 302 consecutive subjects, referring to our dementia centre for suspected cognitive impairment over a six-month period. The MMSE and the MoCA were administered within two hours of each other. Results: 184 (60.91%) of 302 evaluated subjects with a MMSE score between 26 and 30/30 had a pathological MoCA score (< 26). 112/184 (60.84%) patients with a MMSE score between 26 and 29/30 obtained MoCA scores below the norm; 72/184 (39.13%) patients with a 30/30 MMSE had a MoCA score below the norm. Recall (p <.0001) and attention (p<.0001) were the domains that differed significantly on the two screening instruments. Conclusion: The additional use of MoCA, as a global assessment tool for the initial screening process, has allowed the identification of patients with cognitive deficit, despite their performance at MMSE had been the norm. Keywords: MoCA, MMSE, Cognitive Screening Test.
意大利版蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)在西西里岛中部社区老年人日常临床实践中的验证
摘要背景/目的:本研究的目的是在常规临床实践中,通过迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)检查整体认知正常受试者的蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)表现。方法:这是一项前瞻性临床验证研究,涉及302名连续受试者,他们在6个月的时间里向我们的痴呆症中心咨询疑似认知障碍。MMSE和MoCA分别在两小时内进行。结果:302名MMSE评分在26 ~ 30/30之间的受试者中,有184名(60.91%)存在病理性MoCA评分(<26)。MMSE评分在26 ~ 29/30之间的患者中,MoCA评分低于正常值的有112/184 (60.84%);72/184 (39.13%) MMSE为30/30的患者MoCA评分低于正常值。回忆(p<.0001)和注意力(p<.0001)是两种筛选工具上显著不同的领域。结论:额外使用MoCA作为初始筛查过程的全球评估工具,可以识别认知缺陷患者,尽管他们在MMSE中的表现是正常的。关键词:MoCA, MMSE,认知筛选测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信