Comparison of Complication of Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device With Interval Placed IUCD

Q4 Medicine
Hina Khalid, Sadaf Zahra Syed, Fatima Waheed, Fouzia Iqbal, Quraa Mehmud, Aysha Khalid
{"title":"Comparison of Complication of Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device With Interval Placed IUCD","authors":"Hina Khalid, Sadaf Zahra Syed, Fatima Waheed, Fouzia Iqbal, Quraa Mehmud, Aysha Khalid","doi":"10.54393/pjhs.v4i10.1018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For prevention of unintended and closed interval pregnancies through the first year following childbirth, postpartum family the planning is required. A wide range of reliable and cost-effective contraceptive methods are available for postpartum women. Objective: To compare the frequency of complications of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) versus interval placed intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD). Methods: It was a randomized control clinical trial which was conducted in Unit 3, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Lady Willingdon Hospital, Lahore. The time period of this study was 6 months extending from January 2018 to June 2018. After fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 160 patients were enrolled in the study. These patients were followed up for time period of 6 months in both groups. The complications named perforation, pelvic infection and expulsion were noted. All the gathered information regarding variables was analyzed on SPSS version 20.0. Results: The mean age and gestational age of females of the PPIUCD group was 26.50±5.05 years and 38.94±1.42 weeks and interval IUCD group was 28.25±4.40 years and 39.08±1.29 weeks respectively. In this study the pelvic infection was noted in 8 females in which 2 were from PPIUCD group and 6 were from interval IUCD group. Statistically insignificant difference was found between the study groups with pelvic infection i.e. p-value=0.147. Expulsion was noted in 1 female from PPIUCD group and 3 females from interval IUCD group. The difference was insignificant (p>0.05). Conclusions: There was no statistical difference found in frequency of complications with PPIUCD versus interval placed IUCD.","PeriodicalId":45690,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i10.1018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For prevention of unintended and closed interval pregnancies through the first year following childbirth, postpartum family the planning is required. A wide range of reliable and cost-effective contraceptive methods are available for postpartum women. Objective: To compare the frequency of complications of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) versus interval placed intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD). Methods: It was a randomized control clinical trial which was conducted in Unit 3, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Lady Willingdon Hospital, Lahore. The time period of this study was 6 months extending from January 2018 to June 2018. After fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 160 patients were enrolled in the study. These patients were followed up for time period of 6 months in both groups. The complications named perforation, pelvic infection and expulsion were noted. All the gathered information regarding variables was analyzed on SPSS version 20.0. Results: The mean age and gestational age of females of the PPIUCD group was 26.50±5.05 years and 38.94±1.42 weeks and interval IUCD group was 28.25±4.40 years and 39.08±1.29 weeks respectively. In this study the pelvic infection was noted in 8 females in which 2 were from PPIUCD group and 6 were from interval IUCD group. Statistically insignificant difference was found between the study groups with pelvic infection i.e. p-value=0.147. Expulsion was noted in 1 female from PPIUCD group and 3 females from interval IUCD group. The difference was insignificant (p>0.05). Conclusions: There was no statistical difference found in frequency of complications with PPIUCD versus interval placed IUCD.
产后宫内节育器与间隔放置IUCD并发症的比较
为了预防分娩后第一年的意外怀孕和闭合期怀孕,产后家庭计划是必要的。产后妇女可以使用各种可靠和具有成本效益的避孕方法。目的:比较产后宫内节育器(PPIUCD)与间隔放置宫内节育器(IUCD)的并发症发生率。方法:随机对照临床试验,在妇产科第三单元进行;妇科,威灵顿夫人医院,拉合尔。本研究时间为6个月,从2018年1月至2018年6月。在满足纳入标准后,160名患者入组研究。两组患者随访时间均为6个月。并发症包括穿孔、盆腔感染和盆腔排出。所有收集到的变量信息在SPSS 20.0版本中进行分析。结果:PPIUCD组女性平均年龄为26.50±5.05岁,平均胎龄为38.94±1.42周,间歇IUCD组女性平均年龄为28.25±4.40岁,平均胎龄为39.08±1.29周。本研究8例女性发生盆腔感染,其中PPIUCD组2例,间隔IUCD组6例。盆腔感染组间差异无统计学意义,p值=0.147。PPIUCD组1例,间歇IUCD组3例。差异不显著(p>0.05)。结论:PPIUCD与间隔放置IUCD的并发症发生率无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences is an international biomedical journal from Pakistan. We publish materials of interest to the practitioners and scientists in the broad field of medicine. Articles describing original qualitative, quantitative, human/animal clinical or laboratory studies are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信