Hemodynamic changes after atrial fibrillation initiation in patients eligible for catheter ablation: A randomized controlled study

Henrik Almroth, Lars O Karlsson, Carl-Johan Carlhäll, Emmanouil Charitakis
{"title":"Hemodynamic changes after atrial fibrillation initiation in patients eligible for catheter ablation: A randomized controlled study","authors":"Henrik Almroth, Lars O Karlsson, Carl-Johan Carlhäll, Emmanouil Charitakis","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oead112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) hemodynamics is less well studied due to challenges explained by the nature of AF. Until now, no randomized data have been available. This study evaluated hemodynamic variables after AF induction in a randomized setting. Methods and Results Forty-two patients with AF who had been referred for ablation to the University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden, and had no arrhythmias during the four-day screening period were randomized to AF induction versus control (2:1). AF was induced by burst pacing after baseline intracardiac pressure measurements. Pressure changes in the right and left atrium (RA and LA), right ventricle (RV), and systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were evaluated 30 minutes after AF induction compared to the control group. Eleven women and 31 men (median age 60) with similar baseline characteristics were included (intervention n=27, control group n=15). After 30 minutes in AF, the RV end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP) and RV systolic pressure (RVSP) were significantly reduced compared with baseline and between randomization groups (RVEDP: P=0.016; RVSP: P=0.001). AF induction increased DBP in the intervention group compared to the control group (P=0.02), unlike reactions in SBP (P=0.178). RA and LA mean pressure (RAm and LAm) responses did not differ significantly between groups (RAm: P=0.307 LAm: P=0.784). Conclusions Induced AF increased DBP, decreased RVEDP, and RVSP. Our results allow us to understand some paroxysmal AF hemodynamics, which provides a hemodynamical rationale to support rhythm regulatory strategies to improve symptoms and outcomes. Trial registration number (clinicaltrials.gov): No NCT01553045 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01553045?term=NCT01553045&rank=1","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) hemodynamics is less well studied due to challenges explained by the nature of AF. Until now, no randomized data have been available. This study evaluated hemodynamic variables after AF induction in a randomized setting. Methods and Results Forty-two patients with AF who had been referred for ablation to the University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden, and had no arrhythmias during the four-day screening period were randomized to AF induction versus control (2:1). AF was induced by burst pacing after baseline intracardiac pressure measurements. Pressure changes in the right and left atrium (RA and LA), right ventricle (RV), and systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were evaluated 30 minutes after AF induction compared to the control group. Eleven women and 31 men (median age 60) with similar baseline characteristics were included (intervention n=27, control group n=15). After 30 minutes in AF, the RV end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP) and RV systolic pressure (RVSP) were significantly reduced compared with baseline and between randomization groups (RVEDP: P=0.016; RVSP: P=0.001). AF induction increased DBP in the intervention group compared to the control group (P=0.02), unlike reactions in SBP (P=0.178). RA and LA mean pressure (RAm and LAm) responses did not differ significantly between groups (RAm: P=0.307 LAm: P=0.784). Conclusions Induced AF increased DBP, decreased RVEDP, and RVSP. Our results allow us to understand some paroxysmal AF hemodynamics, which provides a hemodynamical rationale to support rhythm regulatory strategies to improve symptoms and outcomes. Trial registration number (clinicaltrials.gov): No NCT01553045 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01553045?term=NCT01553045&rank=1
符合导管消融条件的心房颤动起始后的血流动力学改变:一项随机对照研究
心房颤动(AF)的血流动力学研究较少,这是由于房颤的性质所带来的挑战。到目前为止,还没有随机数据。本研究在随机设置中评估房颤诱导后的血流动力学变量。方法和结果42例转诊至瑞典Linköping大学医院接受消融术治疗的房颤患者,在4天的筛查期间无心律失常,随机分为房颤诱导组和对照组(2:1)。房颤是在基线心内压测量后由爆发性起搏引起的。在房颤诱导30分钟后,与对照组比较,评估左、右心房(RA和LA)、右心室(RV)、收缩压和舒张压(SBP和DBP)的压力变化。纳入基线特征相似的11名女性和31名男性(中位年龄60岁)(干预组n=27,对照组n=15)。房颤30分钟后,左室舒张末压(RVEDP)和右室收缩压(RVSP)较基线和随机分组间显著降低(RVEDP: P=0.016;RVSP: P = 0.001)。与对照组相比,AF诱导干预组舒张压升高(P=0.02),与收缩压升高(P=0.178)不同。RA和LA的平均压力(RAm和LAm)反应在组间无显著差异(RAm: P=0.307 LAm: P=0.784)。结论AF诱发DBP升高,RVEDP和RVSP降低。我们的研究结果使我们能够理解一些阵发性房颤的血流动力学,这为支持心律调节策略以改善症状和结果提供了血流动力学基础。试验注册号(clinicaltrials.gov): No NCT01553045 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01553045?term=NCT01553045&rank=1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信